He even provided a beat on youtube. Poems dont have a beat. Rap song has a beat, but poems are literally words on paper, not meant to be sung. When you provide beat, it becomes a song, or in this case, a rap song.
He is also dissing moderators, dissing bunch of other people in his rap. People who are even irrelevant to topic even if it was a rap battle topic, but again, ask anyone, all people will say what he wrote is rap. It might seem that rap is poem, but its not. Poems have much more strict rules regarding lines in them, and different language in poems which is what creates the difference. Rap is basically sung and you cant read what he wrote without singing it, it sounds retarded as a poem, but only works as rap.
"It's still not a rap battle"
the title is "poem battle". If you use rap, it becomes rap battle, and rap battle is banned by description. Poems have short lines and proper symmetry of lines. No one would label what he wrote as some poems. He is literally dissing the God he is supposed to write poems about.
Do these people not know what poem is? Like, seriously, who thinks thats poem? Its obvious to any sane people that thats just rap about God, after I specifically said this is not a rap battle. Do these guys not read description before accepting debate?
So I write 5 words, and you write 100 sentences in response. Comments dont count in debate, so better save those for debate.
What the hell
the mere existence of this debate as debate disproves Pro position, Pro tries to make a decision while claiming not to make a decision.
Pro lost in round 1.
Easy win for Mall
Great first round by Mall.
I cant believe I lost this debate
Mall wins this easily
It would make sure that there is at least 1 good vote on my debates.
they should enable us to vote on our own debates on this site.
Seriously, these voters have degraded severely. Its not worthy to invest much in debating in debate section with these voters. there is no point in making arguments here if voters just ignore them. I will stick to forum debating, and here I will just post troll debates because apparently voters are trolls as well.
"Pro then says things existed before evidence of them, but this seems to ignore why we believe in them"
I suggest you to avoid circular logic in your vote.
topic is that we dont need a reason to believe in God. Saying that "this seems to ignore reason for belief" is circular reasoning and biased vote.
this isnt "Fail or succeed" topic. tell your chatgPt to stop failing in understanding what topic is.
Its not worthy to dedicate much to debate section right now. Obviously debaters and voters just ignore your arguments, and even use blatant lies in votes. It is better to wait until they fix these issues.
"Then report it"
I never report votes, which could be a reason people take it as a hint that they can cast obviously bad votes.
You get it, but these other people dont.
Whats up with these revenge votes lol
My opponent argues that maximally great being doesnt exist. I argue against that statement.
Logically impossible statement.
God, winning is worse than losing.
"Also you are losing track of all your debates"
Yes, I forgot which argument I wanted to make in that one.
"Women thought he was hot"
Unproved claim.
Do you think he is hot?
This is why I hate winning.
If Mall has accepted this, then I trust it will be interesting.
there goes my vote
