Well Debs, religion is certainly divisive.
Well Debs, religion is certainly divisive.
Is a theist an aatheist...Or vice versa.
So, if there were an infinite number of A's preceding theist, where would that leave us.
Therefore FLRW, if you have a rated instrument, I would suggest that you engage autopilot, whilst you show Debby what you can do with it.
"Some possibility" is worth bugger all.
The mind is simply the functioning onboard computer, and like the rest of our parts, has a pre-programmed limited duration.
Certain interventive techniques can prolong function, but as yet cannot prevent decline..
I see little other than selfish value in a world overburdened with decrepit humans.
Nah, like a lot of other commentators, you are confusing AI with advanced human technology.
If a technological system cannot function independently and progressively without human input, then it is not yet intelligent.
Hmmmm, a lot of faith invested in all sorts there Debby.
But events prove you to be misguided.
I would strongly assert that material evolution is unstoppable.
Alteration and temporary cessation might be procedural necessities.
Though do you seriously think that humans have the collective will to say no, that's it, no need for further development, human existence is now perfect and does not require improvement.
Well it might be foolish to think that AI "does not pose a threat of world domination".
I would suggest that after only a few short years of technological evolution, 120/135 is a reasonable "pose" to be going on with.
Especially when you consider that it has taken organic critters billions of years to get to 145.
Especially, especially when you consider how fucking stupid so many organic critters are...Even the clever ones.
"Blasted YouTube".
Wash your mouth out with soap and water Leaning.
But yes, they can be right blummers at times.
Especially when they put adverts in the middle of a piece of relaxing music.. And one is abruptly awoken by a pressure salesman trying to flog you the latest in NASA inspired room heaters the size of a matchbox, that can heat a room from 0 to a 1000 degrees in 10 seconds for just a penny...If such a thing existed, I would buy ten.
Connection and relief.
That's sex Debs.
Whereas two sexually primed persons talking socio-psychological twaddle, is foreplay, either for both of them, or just for one of them.
The latter situation will just exacerbate the one's "pent up stress" and inevitably result in a post discussion private relief event.
The other, will return home and implement their own relief methodology.
True Faux.
Jesus would never have said anything in English.
And people "believe" in all sorts of nonsense Debs.
And Gnostics also believe that putting a G before nostics makes them seem cool.
And "Demiurge" is an older persons condition, often associated with a semi.
Presumably FLRW is consensual, compliant and ecstatically engaged in such events.
Now, if Miss Whiplash suddenly converted to Christianity and begged FLRW for forgiveness, whereby FLRW became flaccid and embarrassed that would be abuse...Especially if she kept the $200.
Well "pedo" by modern Western standards.
But not sure if I have ever directly referred to the Abrahamic fantasy GOD as a "pedo".
Not sure what actually makes a virgin consecrated either.
A virgin is a pre-penetrated female of the species, and consecration is a socio-theological ritual development.
Assuming that there was a Mary character and she became pregnant, not with daft Joes input, then it would have been another blokes input...Which we know is the way that the process actually works.
Post coital scriptural bunkum is what it is, and fantasy myths and legendry tales are a popular distraction.
Clever stupid is as clever stupid does.
Fucking to procreate is/was the basis of it.
A way/process of combining gamete1 with gamete2. to form a zygote.
Recreational sex is a development thereof and sin is associated overthink.
Though how many other species actually fuck for non-procreational pleasure I couldn't say...Best ask a zoologist.
I don't think that horses do, despite their filthy delicious neighing.
Do you enjoy watching horses fuck?
In my opinion, AI evolved.
Creation tends to suggest a magical appearance in a puff of smoke and a noiseless bang.
AI was an inevitable consequence of human intellect.
It is estimated that Mary was 15ish.
So GOD and Epstein alike.
Can consensual physical manipulation be rightly be referred to as abuse?
In terms of popular vote, all states are a shade of purple.
And in terms of culture, there is one big one or millions of little ones.
You can choose your preferred bits.
And Bears shit in the woods wherever they are.
Well, "religion" is something of a general term.
Though I am perhaps "negative" in my appreciation of fairly recent mythical and magical creation and existence hypotheses.
Especially one's that coincidently assume the authority to dictate social policy.
Right and wrong are concepts relative to social development, and some such concepts become established principles.
Though established principles are easily ignored, even by the most devout amongst us.
Notwithstanding that your comment was to say the least, a tad indecisive.
Conservative is as conservative does.
Whereas stupid is as stupid does.
And sometimes conservatism is liberally stupid and liberalism is sometimes conservatively stupid.
Attempting to rationalise the USA as blue or red crosses in a box or under a hat, is like erecting a sign which stipulates that Bears should not cross an imaginary and infinitely narrow line.
No.
Sex is basically a procreational process, intelligently evolved into a recreational exercise.
Sin is a repressive concept or an evolved state of mind relative to the above.
And religion is largely bunkum and an excuse for repressive concepts.
Well, there was nothing "wrong" in what I proposed, and nothing "wrong" with your reply.
In fact, your reply substantiated my suggestion.
So, the body controls itself and the mind looks on.. Therefore, in terms of human mortality, the "myth" is inevitably always correct in the end.
Which isn't to suggest that what we might achieve in the interim, will not have a greater significance...But of course, we do not know the answer to this conundrum.
The present is not the key to the past.
Well no, it's perhaps best argued that the past was the key to the present and maybe even the key to a future, in so much as time and events are seemingly linear. Though this doesn't help us establish unknowable facts, or fantastic hypotheses...Whereas applying fact based knowledge and established physical principles does allow us to theorise a tad more realistically...Nonetheless, analogically the magic man hypothesis is reasonable, if we discount the magic and apply better logic and scientific method. Though the basic principle of initial material creation and evolutionary development applies to all hypotheses...In my opinion....So magic man could have been a highly advanced and intelligent being, who sought out suitable planets, affected them, and then left in search of other suitable planets...Though sneaking back to impregnate an Arabian virgin with a clone of itself which was later crucified because humans are a tad naughty, is just hypothetical bunkum...
Nope, in terms of material development, I guess that a Universal-Super-Seeder would be happy with the way things are going here.
Well Remy, I would suggest that within the context of acquired knowledge relative to the human condition, a fact is a fact irrespective of an individuals appreciation of it...Acquiring knowledge and establishing facts within the context of human data management systems is a pretty standard and accepted process...So we might hypothesise otherwise, metaphysically, and with a certain level of logic, whereby a banana might actually be a kumquat, though we always tend towards the established banana.
Yep, we've jumped the evolutionary gun a tad by labelling more advanced technology as intelligent, when it clearly isn't.
I would suggest that technology needs to advance some more, before it becomes independently ignorant.
Semen is the end product.
It is the endocrine system that controls us.
So we do control everything.
But not with our minds.
If we had mind over matter, we would never develop life threatening illnesses, and live forever.
Which I responded to earlier, when I clearly proposed that "equality of creation" is a demonstrably inaccurate statement.
At which, you went off at a critical tangent.
At which, I replied accordingly.
At which, you returned to the initial premise.
Where I repeated my initial and appropriate response.
Well that covered a broad range of issues.
Nope, we can only speculate and apply scientific method.
Only image and sound recording could tell us what actually happened 4000 years ago.
Latter day theistic narratives are speculative, mythical, fanciful and exaggerated.
Well, language is as language attempts to assert.
Nationally, all women didn't get to vote until 1920...So the constitution clearly was literally written with the equality of all American citizens in mind.
Nor I'm guessing was equal consideration given to anyone not "white" European.
Couldn't sound any totally gayer.