SergeantLynch

Squirrels have no road sense.


They always live on the opposite side of the road to where they want to be and when a car comes along they cannot decide upon which side of the road they want to be on.


I doubt that squirrels have an IQ of 145, and therefore do not pose a threat of world domination.


Nor dolphins, for they are aquatically limited.


Viruses maybe.


SergeantLynch

All men are created equal.


This is a demonstrably inaccurate statement.


Men are not created, they develop...As do women actually.


And none are equal



Clones educated and nurtured under laboratory conditions, might end up as very very similar men or women.


Monozygotic twins perhaps also, in a controlled environment.

SergeantLynch

I imagine him to be a sort of laid back neo-hippy.


Though neo-hippies would perhaps prefer the designer shabby chic look, rather than the upcycled look.


I certainly don't see him doing the socks and sandals thing.

SergeantLynch

My thoughts are.


LancelotDuLac...Hmmmmmmm?


Thinking is an internal electro-chemical process, whereby we assess data and sometimes apply as external actions if we deem appropriate.


Which isn't to say that appropriately deeming external actions will always be appropriate in the long run...Because events are such that, once deemed and appropriated there is no going back...It's a time thing.


Economically, is making the best of what is available.


For sure, war and fighting are still sometimes deemed appropriate...So one might argue that such events are either appropriate or uneconomical...Though such arguments usually occur after the event, and are therefore a tad futile.

SergeantLynch

It will somehow need to be switched on.


Nonetheless, our current nanoseconds of facile AI denunciation, are merely current nanoseconds of facile AI denunciation.


Whereas, I'm guessing that things will be a tad different a thousand years from now.

SergeantLynch

Selfish is the human organisms default setting.



And:


Belief in nihilism is a contradiction.


Hedonism is genetically encoded, though we have learned to degrees to suppress such messaging.


Materialism is a developed survival strategy...Best cave, best berries, best pile of stones, best fitted kitchen etc.


Atheism is theism with an A, and both are seemingly inevitable intellectual developments....Clever dinosaurs would have worshipped an omni-godosaur and clever/er dinosaurs would have thought that the omni-godosaur hypothesis was a tad silly.


Though when Marysaur laid he clutch of eggs, how would she have chosen which one was Jesusaur.


First to hatch might have been female.


If the 42nd had been a male, that would have proven everything....Life existence and asteroids.



SergeantLynch

Man versus Bear is social media inspired twaddle.


And there are a willing and growing bunch of numpties who will addictively respond to social media inspired twaddle.

SergeantLynch

"LOVE".


Covers a multitude of internal electro-chemical and endocrinal management issues.


As does fondness.


I am fond of my dog, ice cream and a plethora of other sweet desserts.


In terms of psychological attachment, and in descending order of fondness, I am fond of my wife and daughters, my dog and sweet desserts.


There are certainly other appreciations that might also figure in my list of fondness's



The word "LOVE" never really works for me...I'm too rational.

SergeantLynch

Or, more likely than not, you will either be buried and slowly decay, or be incinerated in a fiery furnace.


I would imagine that a Universal Super-Intelligence, would find the human concepts of heaven and hell a tad silly, but amusing and typical.



SergeantLynch

Great as in great, or great as in great?


And how maximal is maximal?


It's reckoned that Dreadnoughtus was about 65 metres in length and weighed about 60 tonnes...So more maximal than that?

SergeantLynch

We were talking alpha-male at the time and I was thinking the human equivalent of a big hairy silver backed gorilla or a ten point rutting stag.


Not thinking about socio-conceptualities like the Law or taking her out for a meal and waiting to get married before broaching the subject of penetration.


Within the constraints of human conceptual law, I would propose that it is always best to abide by the rules.


Nonetheless, I still contend that "legalizing rape" is something of a contradiction in terms.


Legalizing rape would render the act as permissible non-consensual sexual molestation and/or penetration.


Though I think that the grey area would be in the level of force required, rather than in the sex act/s itself/themselves.