SergeantLynch

Multiplied the basket cases too then.

Hmmmm.

So in your book, who is GOD and who is Christ.

For as I see it, Christ was a nickname given to a bloke born approximately 2025 years ago, who lived for about 33 years. I think that it was this blokes dad who supposedly made Adam...Though by your hermeneutical and mathematical reckoning that would make his dad about 4000 years old.

All very outlandish, these hermeneutics and dodgy maths.

Maybe it was headlice.

Yep, less of a rush and more of a stroll.

Cheaper to leave it to the Chinese.

Russians too busy at the mo.

Indians still don't know where to put the tandoori oven.

British can't get the blue touch paper lit.

Whacky hairdos and talking gibberish.

Demonstrates the power of exaggerated folk tales.

So not only did he multiply the fish sandwiches, he also multiplied the baskets.

I don't think that Hitler did a great deal of hiking in his latter years.

Or goose stepping.

A lot of ranting maybe.

And the odd one off suicide...Seated or otherwise, I don't know.

Design icons such as Faux's chair area sound investments.

Though unless you have a $1000 spare, I would suggest that you keep scrolling.

Parthenogenesis is not unusual in reptiles and other species...But not Middle Eastern Virgins.

So reasonably astonishing, but not miraculous.

Eve did.

Mary's experience was somewhat more rough and ready, in the stable...Joe was sent off on the donkey on an errand when Mary saw Godfrey coming down the road on his Camel.

Hey Debby, so two dudes are parked up outside your gaff vying for your attention, are you going to pick the one in the Kia Picanto or the one in the Ferarri 599 GTO.

Hey! And Adam came before Abraham...Dirty old perverts...LOL

And how many thousands of years of age does that make Adam?

Hmmmm. Where have you been the past few thousand years.

When did thinking humans regard animal sexuality in the same way they regard their own sexuality...Such is the big contradiction.

So, the knowledge of the juicy fruit and the serpent...Come on Poly doesn't take a genius to recognise the metaphor.

Hmmm.

I think that unusual interstellar Comet is still regarded as the best bet by most astronomers, and that Alien tech is a fanciful hypothesis put forwards by a controversial figure, who has proposed the same on previous occasions...And of course, for most laymen the former is a tad boring and the latter way more exciting.

So let's wait and see.

Though it would undoubtedly be a profound moment if it was identified as first Alien contact.

I also guessed that this would be you.

I like furniture that is well made and is aesthetically pleasing.

Art Nouveau, Art Deco and Arts and Crafts styles all fit the bill...Bauhaus too.

I suppose that Bauhaus is sort of the German take on Deco and Arts and Crafts.

Upon skimming through the Forums page, one notices certain titles and it's plainly obvious who is the author.

Democrat critical or green energy conspiracy has to be Faux.

And I am grateful that you do so, because it makes for interesting discussion and compositional exercise.

Undoubtedly.

I expect that Putin cheats at judo too...Who would dare to try and beat him...They would soon be flying out of a 15th floor window.

Yep I know the gobbledegook.

But as I said, the fruit was a metaphor representing sexuality, therefore not specifically a fruit.

The story was made up by sexually repressed semidesert folk with body issues.

Yep, knew it.

Fauxlaws obsession.

I think that Putin is a Judo man, whereas Trump is a golfer.

Trump has the advantage of a good swing with a heavy wedge.

There are always a couple of juicy plums available.

Well, I think that box or not, human remains are never deep enough to be converted into oil...Rather, they are broken down by soil organisms and are eventually incorporated into the sub soil.

And people, or more correctly first hominids, emerged approximately 4 million years ago whereas oil deposits were formed between 70 and 250 million years ago...Just to put time periods into perspective.

Nonetheless, the current issue concerns human society in the 21st century, and the impact that more extreme climatic events will have on modern infrastructure and burgeoning human populations with their associated expectancies.

And for sure, simply in terms of species, our ability to adapt and survive is unlikely to be in question.

And if you are an ageing human, secure in a mountain hideaway, then you can probably afford to be somewhat blase about extreme weather and environmental events that might affect others in less secure places.

And let's be clear, the current issue is not relative to long term variations in the Earths climate. It concerns an increase in average global temperatures over a very short period of time, that can be attributed directly to the rate of extraction and burning of fossil fuels by humans.

So we keep on as we are and say what the heck, or we attempt to address the issue. You run with the first option, and others think the second option is somewhat more prudent...Which I suppose is typical human behaviour.

I'm assuming that a majority grew.

If something decreased, it would likely become a minority.

Sort of, if bananas were preferable and kumquats not, then relative to equal levels of repletion, there would be a majority of kumquats and minority of bananas in the fruit bowl.

Sack those in charge of fruit acquisition and fruit bowl maintenance, is my advice.

Hmmmm, I'm betting that Melania runs his bubble bath and vigorously agitates all his nooks and crannies, every evening before bed.

I bet you wish that she would do the same for you too.

For sure language evolved, and will continue to do so.

Neologisms are frequent.

Hmmmm. I'm well aware of the processes that brought about the formation of Fossil fuels, and that, as the name suggests they have an organic base...And certainly there will still be undiscovered resources...But to suggest that it was/is a continuous and sustainable process relative to human demand in the short term, is not a theory that is substantiated by scientific study.

Though the current climate change issue is not about geological processes and the availability of fossil fuels, but rather about the rapid process of extraction and burning over the past few hundred years, and the consequent effects of rises in atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse substances.

So as I see it, the evolution of Earth processes, also includes the evolution of intellectual application and manipulation, therefore everything is natural...Billions of years of fossil fuel formation, a few hundred years of large scale fossil fuel burning and now addressing the affects of our actions...And some people will say, what the heck, which is all a part of the process.

Not sure how much human post mortem rituals were/are a contributory factor to either fossil fuel formation or greenhouse gas emissions. Though crematoria and other cremation rituals undoubtedly produce CO2...Whereas in a box or not, burial returns carbon to the Earth.

Numbers don't vibrate, though they might be used to mathematically represent particle vibrations.

Numbers are simply representative symbols.

So 42 won't kill you, though 42 volts might do if you let them vibrate for long enough.

Dubya was the best President ever, for he filled us with joy and laughter.

Border relations between Canada and Mexico have never been better. LOL

True, the English language is a comparatively recent thing.

Rene Descartes was French, though cogito ergo sum is Latin.

And I'm guessing that some ancient hominid, thought the thought and uttered a relevant sound, long ago.

And for sure, someone probably did the same approximately 3300 years ago.

Nothing has really changed, other than a certain modern modus is somewhat less stinky and violent. Which is perhaps a tad nicer.

Though I don't think that this is a general phenomenon.

There are still plenty of stinky aggressive men about, and plenty of fecund women.

I'm guessing that you get a lot of your info from agenda driven social media sources.

Well by far the the best source of energy is the Sun, though we waste it's abundant supplies.

And oil reserves are the result of climate change, long ago.

And I clearly didn't state than man was/is the primary cause of climate change.

But I certainly don't run with the idea that mans contribution to the recent rise in average global temperature is a conspiracy theory...I accept that it is based upon sound scientific research and monitoring.

When ignorance is bliss, it is sometimes foolish to be wise.

I like that.