SergeantLynch

And so.

When is the awards ceremony?

Yes, the west could learn a lot from the Chinese model...Trump has.

I'm guessing that Sally will be frumpy rather than sexy.

Whereas Roxy the sex education teacher will be suitably equipped for hands on instruction...As will Roger.

Magic-man hypothesis is very easy to understand, though unlikely to be true.

Whereas a super-intelligence is feasible and also easy to understand, but there's been no follow-up as far as I know...Which leads me to conclude that this hypothesis is also unlikely to be correct.

Which leaves us with a uniquely evolving intelligent system, or similarly evolving intelligent systems.

And it's highly likely that other evolving intelligent systems came up with a magic-being hypothesis at some point in their development.

Evolution will out.

But yes, will first contact be a techno-message or a blob of organic goo in a spaceship.

So you admit that Christianity is also a mythology?

Magic-man hypothesis was perhaps inevitable considering primate dominance, though the hypothesis led nowhere other than up the wrong path to a dead end.

So cleverer primates slowly constructed new paths towards the new techno-god.

That's right, city centres on a Friday night when pubs and clubs close is the time to spot classy women at their oestrogen fuelled best.

Though perhaps Canadian women are classier and don't vomit on the pavement.

Hey, such are mating rituals.

Undeniably, evolution is an unstoppable force of nature.

Yep, but how many human organisms are necessary.

Okay so I suppose that it takes X number of people to produce one genius, and then X number of people to sustain genii and material progress.

So what will happen when a real AI takes over the role of the genii...How many people will be necessary then?

Well I suppose it all hinges upon whether everything is either purposeful or purposeless.

And yep, overthinking the innate desire to breed and survive will be difficult...Perhaps it will be an AI's job to overthink that one for us.

Yes, my wife is certainly my boon.

And women are also perhaps somewhat less prone to testosterone fuelled stupidity.

Talking about dedicated thinking Faux.

Have yo ever tried to not think?

It's a bit like a heartbeat, when it stops it's usually fan shit hitting time.

Human society at all levels has the ongoing tendency towards a lead and leaders situation...I can't see that changing.

And controllable AI, is perhaps just the cutting edge of current technology and not AI in a real sense.

The evolution of Another Intelligence, that can override the off switch has a way to go yet...But the clever/stupid thing is, humans will be the architects of a real AI lead future.

Makes one wonder why.

Such were tales from the Middle East.

So his disciples were aware that he could be a bit of a discriminatory arsehole.

That's human nature I suppose.

Well, whether or not "mankind" can escape it's earthly prison remains to be seen...Perhaps AI stands a better chance.

Organic data processing units are very fragile, and also prone to selfish stupidity.

That's true, a newer mythology replaced older ones.

For sure, too many explosions.

Though what the majority are addictively investing in is smart technology.

Such is the new brainwashing.

Yes, I clearly wouldn't make a good detective.

So, the demise of DebateArt and the return of Debby has revitalised the Forum...What do you think Boys?

Yes, I'm guessing that eventually all power will be devolved to AI...(Which is of course a contradiction)

But in the meantime humans will get the chance to argue the toss.

So call AI John Smith and who/what will know which is John Smith and which is John Smith.

Well, the medium dictates that AI John Smith will know, whereas I'm guessing that most numpties won't.

For sure.

And I think it's fair to say that Jew's neighbours have been more than sceptical of Jews.

Yes, summing it all up is what we would like to achieve.

But I expect that it will be a few more million years yet before we can finally sum it all up.

That's if we survive of course...Might be left to an AI to sum it all up.

In so much as a European book of the second millennium, proves absolutely zilch other than itself as a rehash of earlier mythology.

Not to say that super-intelligent intervention isn't a feasible hypothesis, but old men in sandals up mountains several thousand years ago were no scientists...More likely to have been off their heads on some popular Middle Eastern shamanistic hallucinogen.

So Trump is just a tolerated anomaly then?

One that suits your requirements.

No thoughtful rise to political stardom necessary.

Just good old right wing, white male dominated conservatism.

Well, might be a baker or a hair stylist or a techno-geek...Dresses are always optional...Trousers are sometimes more practical though, as a lot of real women will attest to.

"Free choice"...Now there's a thing.

And OK, so someone else must have made up hell stories, later on.

And people die and decompose and their living labels die with them...That's it as far as we know.

So stick a dead Jew a dead Muslim a Dead Christian a dead Buddhist and a dead Hindu into a crematorium together and cook them thoroughly, and you will be left with one heap of indeterminate ashes...Yep it's a job for the living.

People write and read, and there are numerous narratives to get stuck into.

Religious stuff per se, does not enlighten the modern progressive mind...Which isn't to say that religious hypotheses were not at one time the cutting edge of progress...But we've come a long way since then, in terms of material development and knowledge.

Progressive minds are rare and the result of species evolution...Why?...We don't know is the simple answer.

So some people like to get there heads stuck into old narratives, and rarer minds develop AI, and I guess that AI will continue to move things forwards into the technological age.

And the masses come and go, and like to argue, fight, kill, knock balls about and do all sorts of other mundane stuff to placate their need for mental stimulation.

So read "scripture"...It's one of many options...And yes, it's obviously true that the more you read something the more you will remember what is written.

Yes, I'm apt to agree.

We can redefine words and play pretending and dressing up games.

And for the relative nanosecond of his existence, a man that can no longer ejaculate semen, might be useful in other areas.

So notwithstanding bivalves...Have we heard Mr Platners appeal yet?

Perhaps too soon to accuse someone of being a human flesh wasting nitwit.

So, who created GOD, and where was he living pre-universe?

Others would have it that all potential was initiated in a moment, and that GOD is the stuff of minds.

And that it took a tad longer than 6 days for minds to develop.

And yes, Sunday Scholl had a lot to answer for.

Though I never complained about the chocolate eggs and christmas presents.