Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 3 days ago

They place higher priority on the freedom of speech,

Like shooting people in the neck. That kind of priority.

the right of private ownership

Like government-owned stores and confiscatory taxes and fines on landlords for the purpose of asset seizure.

and the freedom of choice in social life

Like the choice to be canceled for saying the wrong things. For not choosing the correct culture. Harsh punishments for not complying with the culture of the party.


All of this is Soviet Style.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 4 days ago

You guys enjoyed Trump Socialism almost as much as Democrat Socialism.


Almost.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 4 days ago

There is no doubt that MAGA brought a Bill Clinton-type president to solidify socialism as part of the American GOP. What the USA has now, and going forward, are two socialist parties: one on the right that is headed toward nationalist socialism and one on the left that caters to globalist socialism.


Because globalist socialism is failing very hard in the EU and other places like Canada due to cultural tribalism, it's very easy to predict where the USA will be in 10 years.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 4 days ago

It's all about feelings.


And living without a "proper" king in charge is harder mental work, with much more anxiety than mindlessly toiling in the royal corporate fields.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 5 days ago

Yes.


Serfs often felt better with the proper king in charge.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 5 days ago

Socialism is really modern feudalism with the nobility in government.

The modern serf makes the easy choice to surrender control to managers who promise to act on their behalf, and then becomes dependent on those managers despite the endless rug-pulls and hypocrisy.

Shoresy

MAGA run!

Shoresy · 6 days ago

Blue Wave hasn't even started the socialism they are promising, and the USA stock market is already showing signs of zero confidence.


Like I have been saying for months to the Americans on this site: Enjoy the Socialism/Communism.

Shoresy
Islam is one of the most conservative religions of all time. It's hilarious that anyone thinks conservative Christians have a real party in USA, they have capitalist pig vs capitalist cow.


I wouldn't be surprised to see an El-Sayeed type on the GOP ticket soon. Democrats are already ditching the Islamic candidates over LGBTBBQ issues.

American White Men have no choice but to align with Islam at this point.

Shoresy
Or more accurately, were sort of told by their European theo-political masters that only they understood Jesus and could get the masses into heaven for a price...10% of your annual goods and chattels should cover it, bless you my son, now f**k off and pray and leave that good looking young lad of yours because I've got a job for him later...Piety indeed.

And the victors of WW2 get to write history in their own image, like Gods.

Shoresy

There was never a time in the USA when this wasn't so. Tories routinely called George Washington an egotistical tyrant. It's hardly current.


Even if there were "decent" ones, there will always be the midwit voter who refuses to see it simply because they were not on the winning side.

Shoresy
Thats borrowing, 

Inflation is created with federal t bills when the Federal Reserve buys Treasury securities.


Government is inefficient spender, due to lack of cost consideration policy.


And voters are worse borrowers than politicians,

Politicians damage their party's reputation with every t bill issued to the Fed Reserve.

Voters have no reputation to lose.

Shoresy
My system is simply that newly created money gets equally distributed to all citizens, or in a more effective way, to those who are poor.


It's why blue states that let the voters create money with bond measures don't care about the State's deficit. They will get all the benefits immediately and will likely die before worrying about repayment. Tragedy of the commons.

Shoresy

Redistributing the authority to create money does not create additional houses, food, labor, or productive resources.


If everybody can print money, everybody has an incentive to print before everybody else does.

And if citizens must vote on how much to print, you've simply recreated a political monetary authority with no localized incentive constraints.


Imagine a community representing 1% of the population can authorize $10 billion in new currency for its members.

Its members receive the immediate benefits, while the inflationary consequences are distributed across the entire country.

Why wouldn't they vote yes?


Now, if every community does the same thing, the collective result would be disastrous, even though each community acted rationally in its own interest.

That's a classic tragedy of the commons. It's a thoroughly debunked idea. Modern game theory also explains why it's a terrible idea. If each community receives the immediate benefits of its own currency issuance while spreading inflation costs across everyone, because both have an equal incentive to print.


The tragedy of the commons should be required reading, even for Midwits.

Imagine this: The dollar's purchasing power is a shared common community resource.

Each individual community has an incentive to create additional purchasing power through currency creation.

But when everyone does it, the value of that shared resource deteriorates.

Think of this as similar to overfishing. What makes sense for one participant will become exponentially destructive when everyone follows the same strategy.


It's why blue states that let the voters create money with bond measures don't care about the State's deficit. They will get all the benefits immediately and will likely die before worrying about repayment. Tragedy of the commons.