Sidewalker


SkepticalOne wrote:
In the real world, Rubio is a better candidate than Vance. In Maga world, I think Vance would be favored.


No doubt, but MAGA can't win on their own, Rubio has appeal to the voters outside of MAGA that they need to win.


I don't think it really matters, I suspect the Dems could run a trained monkey in 2028 and still win the election.


Assuming we are talking elections in 2028, I think Trump's base is more into insurrection and authoritarianism than democracy, there's a lot that could happen, I don't see a peaceful exchange of power in 28, I'm sure there will be violence.

Sidewalker


Savant wrote:
I agree but I doubt Trump would allow him to distance himself
Rubio's biggest chance is if Trump dies. Which is why it's surprising to me that anyone on the left would want Trump's death. I think it's a minority of Dems, but even if you hate the guy, I think it's pretty clear he's a massive liability to Republicans.


That's all true, but most Democrats think it's pretty clear he's a massive liability to the entire country, and that he represents a huge danger to the American people. We're not just talking soldiers, 15 million Americans lost health insurance or public health coverage, rural area are losing Medicaid Hospitals and are left with no hospital care for hundreds of miles, six million lost nutritional assistance through SNAP. There are real world consequences that will cost us tens of thousands of American Lives. We live under the threat of war and terrorism; and our democracy is under attack.


This goes far beyond the partisan politics and there is a lot of outrage about the real-world consequences of his actions. This elevated level of polarization combined with the impact Trump has had on public rhetoric and political discourse, with combative, dehumanizing and violent language, it's completely understandable that some people wish him dead, that's just a natural result of the effect Trump has had on American politics.









Sidewalker


Savant wrote:
it will be little Marco Rubio, he will lose by a smaller margin than JD will lose by
I could see a path to victory for Rubio, but it depends on a lot of things. If Republicans get stomped in the midterms, they may be less able to shoot themselves in the foot, and when bad stuff does happen, the Democrats can be blamed. If Rubio can distance himself from Trump and the challenger is someone like AOC who is more polarizing, he might have the upper hand.


I agree but I doubt Trump would allow him to distance himself, Trump is convinced that he is wildly popular and he loves the campaign trail, no Republican can win without the MAGA vote, maybe Trump can't make a candidate win, but he can definitely make a candidate lose.


The Democrats are pretty stupid, but I don't think they are stupid enough to run AOC.


But you never know, i have completely lost any ability to predict, or even comprehend American politics for quite a while now. It just doesn't make sense anymore, I wouldn't be surprised if Vermin Supreme won in 2028.


If Keisha Lance Bottoms wins (I'll be surprised), then I will be pushing for Jon Ossoff in 28, if she doesn't win then Jackson would replace him with a Republican senator, either way, Jon Ossoff is young, he can wait till 32.,


Whatever happens, I'm sure it will still feel like a Fellini movie.


Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
I am a trans person. Well, I am trans age actually. I identify as a 13 year old Japanese anime schoolgirl living in Tokyo and studying to become a rocket engineer while having a secret career as an anti-smoker activist and fighter plane pilot, but when night comes I dress up as a catgirl and fight crime.


The guy who lives in New Jersey, identifies as from Korea, then Bosnia, and now Tokyo.


Wonder where he'll be from tomorrow?


I do understand though, nobody wants to admit they are from New Jersey, but he needs to make up his mind, he should pick one and stay with it.



Sidewalker

I'm always frustrated by how little and how late Obama comes out to help. I understand it is because MAGA is so much about hating on Obama that he tends to motivate the MAGA voters to come out, but I still think he could have done more this election.


Obama is coming to Atlanta tomorrow, just three hours after it was announced my wife and I signed up to go and there were already 1.5 million people signed up. It's first come first served and I figure people are already standing in line to get in and I'm too old for that shit, so we won't get to see him. Jon Ossof is a done deal (and I helped), but Keisha Lance Bottoms needs help, hopefully Obama gets the vote out for her and Ossoff pulls votes through for her. Trump is out a lot as always, he just wants the attention, but I think he helps the Democrats more than the Republicans. He is going to the deepest red locations and still there are a lot of empty seats in the venues, he can't even fill a venue in deep red states, and in a purple state Obama had 1.5 million attendees sign up in three hours, I really hope Trump knows about that. Trump says imagine I'm on the ballot, Democrats say imagine Trump is on the ballot, I really think Trump's economy and war are going to have a lot of Republicans staying home.


I think there's going to be a blue wave this cycle, but I'm extremely anxious about it, losing sleep and all that. Of course, I pretty much always do that, but this feels like the most important election of my lifetime (and I only think that about half the time lol).


Anyway, my thinking is even though the polls are showing Republicans getting their ass kicked, I believe they are showing Republican's higher than they will actually perform. It's one thing to tell a pollster you favor the Republicans; it's another to actually go out and vote and I think they stay home. I live deep in Trump country, Trump signs were everywhere six months ago, now it's difficult to find one LOL, Trump hasn't just embarrassed our country, he's embarrassed his base, and they were shameless people.


I've been a campaign rep for Jon Ossoff for a long time, he's gonna win this race, and I will I'll be campaigning for him again, next time it will be for President.









Sidewalker


FLRW wrote:
Yes, climate change is real and unequivocally driven by human activity. Scientific consensus, supported by NASA, the Royal Society, and the IPCC, confirms that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate, with the last decade being the warmest on record. 


Fauxlaw said Trump debunked that in 2018, weren't you paying attention?


Trump would never lie, obviously climate change is a democrat conspiracy.




.



Sidewalker


Shoresy wrote:


I actually have ten Zimbabwe hundred trillion-dollar bills, I use them for bookmarks.


Let me explain what that means, you see, for people who read books, a bookmark is something we use to keep the place in the book.



Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
I don't play a victim.


That's all you do.


I am a victim. Anyone who is born in Bosnia is technically a victim.


That's this year, last year you were born in Korea.


Everybody knows you are really from Alabama.


Not to mention all the hits, slaps, punches, insults, humiliation and brain damage I had to endure.


The reason you say this, is all 5 of the reasons why toxic people play the victim.

1. To control you.

2. To get sympathy

3. To avoid taking responsibility

4. To win an argument

5. To get attention


Poor baby, can you give me a wah, wah, wah, and a boo hoo hoo.


That way, you can avoid responsibility, and get attention and sympathy, you live for attention and sympathy.



Sidewalker


RemyBrown wrote:
@SideWalker
The top 1% owns 32.5% of the nations wealth.
That's doctors, lawyers, engineers, actuaries, etc; people that earned their wealth. Look, in a whole foods store with 500 people in it, 5 of them are in the top 1%.


I suppose you think that makes a point of some kind, but nevertheless, it’s a non-sequitur. I know what the top 1% is, what I don’t know is why you think making up numbers regarding Whole Foods has to do with anything.


The billionaires didn't need that trillion dollars, the people who lost their health Insurance and SNAP benefits needed it.
If you take issue with it, then have your state expand Medicaid funding on it's own. Butt none of them picked up the slack; they just want to blame Trump for stuff.


Or we can reject the authoritarian rule of the billionaire class and fight against it because it exploits the needy. I’m out there protesting, raising money, campaigning for Jon Ossof, and doing what I can to make a difference for this country, while you sit in your Mom’s basement eating Cheetos and typing racist nonsense all day. As long as you refuse to put down the Cheetos and leave your mom’s basement you just don’t matter Pumpkin.


What truly amazes me, is that it’s the neediest that are Trump’s most loyal base, and that’s who Trump shits on the most. How is it that the underbelly of US society sees this privileged prick who inherited all his money as one of them? Fact is Pumpkin, you need to pull yourself up and out of the trailer park, Trump isn’t going to do it for you, he’s just going to make it harder for you. Sure, you can still feel satisfied that he makes it even harder for black and brown people, but being a satisfied underbelly of society is nothing to be proud of.


I do get it though, the only people Trumps craps on worse than his base are of course black and brown people, and so it’s those on the bottom rungs of the social ladder that Trump’s overt racism appeals to most.  So maybe you think it’s worth it to sit on the bottom rung of society in terms of education, income, and social standing and watch as he works against the minorities who have achieved so much more than you, but I think it’s kinda like cutting off your nose to spite your face.


Of course, it’s that mentality that made you the underbelly of society in the first place, you just want to blame black people for your lack of success.


The bottom 50% (roughly 66 million families) hold only about 2.3% to 2.5% of the nation's wealth. 900 U.S. billionaires own significantly more wealth than half of the country combined. The top 1% (1.3 mm Households) owns fourteen times as much as the bottom 50% 66 million households)
This is irrelevant because GINI coefficients don't imply economic success; Norway's GINI coefficient is on par with Pakistan's. Pakistan is a shithole.


No shit Sherlock, I know what the Gini Index is, and I know it’s not about the country’s economy; it’s about income or wealth distribution within the country’s economy.  The fact that you Googled the Gini Coefficient and then either didn’t read it, or didn’t comprehend it, doesn’t make the huge and growing wealth disparity in this country irrelevant, it just makes you irrelevant.

Sidewalker


RemyBrown wrote:
The left claims billionaires "run out with all of the money".

Just 3% of the nation's wealth is owned by billionaires.


U.S. billionaires (numbering roughly 900 to 924 individuals, hold a combined wealth of approximately $7.8 trillion, which is roughly 3.5% to 4% of total U.S. household wealth. The top 1% owns 32.5% of the nations wealth.


The bottom 50% (roughly 66 million families) hold only about 2.3% to 2.5% of the nation's wealth. 900 U.S. billionaires own significantly more wealth than half of the country combined. The top 1% (1.3 mm Households) owns fourteen times as much as the bottom 50% 66 million households),


Trump took health insurance away from over 15 million people, and eliminated SNAP benefits from 6 million, this was in order to give the top 1% a TRILLION-dollar tax cut.


The billionaires didn't need that trillion dollars, the people who lost their health Insurance and SNAP benefits needed it.



Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
You're singing your song, "Wah wah wah, poor poor pitiful me".

As long as I am the victim, everyone else is a bully, all my mistakes are their fault, and even if my position becomes worse and people start insulting me, it just means I am even more of a victim, so I have more room to complain and more reason for people to feel compassion towards me.


By making me into a bully, you are victimizing me, that makes you the bully and me the victim.


Wah wah wah, poor poor pitiful me.


Poor Poor Pitiful Me (2008 Remaster) - YouTube


Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
Incoherent babbling....can you give me a wah wah wah?

Jews invented the circumcision, so they are the reason I have useless bent soft unattractive ugly incompetent penis. My penis is literally a Jewish invention.


You're singing your song, "Wah wah wah, poor poor pitiful me".



Sidewalker


SatanLucy wrote:
Everything is antisemitic these days. Sometimes even truth is antisemitic. Bobby Fisher, world chess champion and one of highest IQ in history, was also "anti semitic".

Apparently, any critique which is directed at any Jew or Israel or Israel government and its torture chambers they call prisons, is anti semitism.

So if you dont want to be anti semite, you better support Trump because Israel commands you to.


Incoherent babbling....can you give me a wah wah wah?

Sidewalker


FLRW wrote:
Kermos, you have extremely poor reasoning ability. Well, you do think the Universe is 6000 years old.


He thinks

1) The Universe is 6000 years old, and

2) The Christian God is a liar.


One minute he's attacking science, the next minute he's attacking Christianity,


I think he inflicts the most damage on Christianity though.

Sidewalker


FLRW wrote:
Most criminals in the United States identify as religious, with Christian denominations (particularly Protestants and Catholics) comprising the vast majority of the prison population, while atheists are significantly underrepresented, often comprising less than 1% of inmates despite being a larger share of the general population.


There are no atheists in foxholes, or in front of parole review boards.

Sidewalker


Savant wrote:
After considering this, I really can't come up why a reason that racial/gender/anything profiling for the sake of personal safety would be morally wrong in and of itself if it doesn't involve harming the other person.


I think it comes down to what kind of actions the profiling results in. If it results in unequal treatment, it is morally wrong, if it doesn't result in unequal treatment, then what's the point?


If by racial profiling I decide a black man is more dangerous than a white man, then there must be some action I would take if a man is black that I wouldn't take if he was white. "If it doesn't involve harming the other person" is pretty nebulous, I suppose no harm is done if you reach over and lock the car door when you see a black man walking down the sidewalk and don't when it's a white man, but in general, prejudicial treatment of another is harmful.


If you are afraid of someone because they are black, I assume you will react differently to a situation involving a black man that could cause harm. Fear causes some people to act violently, socially stigmatize, exclude, and in general, relate in an unfair way.


In general, prejudice is morally wrong because it results in unequal treatment.