SergeantLynch wrote:
Misogyny is rife indeed.
You boys and your sexual angst and desire to control women.
Next you will be telling them that abortion should be illegal.
I wonder why females tend not to hang around here.
Debate is a disagreeable activity intrinsically, and women are less disagreeable than men. Men vocalize opinions more too, so I am not surprised by most users being men.
SergeantLynch wrote:
I sometimes jet over and make guest appearances...Though these shows are usually sold out months in advance.
Check with the box office for details.
If you can throw it back and ground pound like you really are a gay stripper, I will tip you. Anonymously. Because I would be impressed. With your skills
TONIGHT'S SHOW: SOLD OUT!! SPECIAL GUEST APPEARANCE HAS FILLED THE ROOM. A SERGEANT WITH ATTITUDE AND SIDEBURNS FOR DAYS!! WELCOME HIM, PEOPLE!!
I want to give you an idea of who I am. I was an evolutionist, but Christ changed me into a Christian.
What made you change your mind?
That's a neat background story. I'll have to make a note to add my own sometime soon to the thread.
Btw, did you add a star to your pfp?
My younger brother is very attractive and has had many girls crush on him. He is kind of like a beautiful man. He is on the same level as an 18 year old Leonardo DiCaprio. I used to look more like him, but long story short, his life has been easier and he has maintained practices that naturally ensure his attractiveness while I have had worse life that negatively affected my appearance. My older brother has had an even worse life and looks even worse as such.
I have to put more effort into looking better, but hopefully developing the good habits I am working on will increase attraction from women.
SatanLucy wrote:
If you are reading this with an interest of finding a girlfriend, there is already a high chance you are poor or having bad looks or both.
I'm gonna pretend I didn't hear that.
I am none of those things! But look at how ticked off I am walking away.
But fear not, Allah has considered that situation too. It doesnt matter how poor and ugly you are. Its basically guaranteed there is a girl out there who is both poorer and uglier than you. So to her, you are an upgrade.
this article was reviewed by experts and approved by Allah and Ra.
Allah is such a providential Leader
SergeantLynch wrote:
And never mention the word "LOVE"...Which is simply an overreaction in moments of intense releases of energy.
So LOVE is Love Oil Vigorously Emitting/Exploding.
SatanLucy wrote:
Orgasms can add years to your life
I am a chain smoker. I would need 500,000 orgasms just to break even in life expectancy.
You've got to be joking. 😂
A cry for help comes in different ways I guess
What does equal status look like in practice? Does anyone know? Women don't act the same way as men, but they'd hold the same positions and be viewed the same way? Women in politics lead with emotion as is known by their psychology which is not the best form of decision-making.
Equal status for women looks like fair pay for equal work, balanced sharing of home care, comparable numbers of women and men in leadership roles, the same choice of body, etc. etc.
We already have fair pay for equal work, so what is the elevated state of equality that the Feminists are fighting for that has not yet been reached? Balanced sharing of home care happens in successful marriages which do exist and is not something hypothetical, so again there is already equality there. Comparable numbers of men and women in leadership roles is not pragmatic to pursue. Men will always tend to be more effective leaders, and encouraging a type of people that tend to be less effective leaders to take even more leadership roles is nonsensible. The ones who perform better will take more prominence, and those will tend to be men so equality in leadership positions as you described isn't sustainable.
Not for nothing, our current president (a man) leads with emotion. There is a very short list of people (man or woman) who would not be more emotionally stable than him. He is a weak individual.
Even if that were true, an example of one man does not negate my stance that men as an average have the differentiators, capabilities, and enhanced qualities over women I described.
Now we have more depressed single women who regret not getting married because they're fed this lie that they need to focus on business and "male pursuits" to be viewed as equal.
You poor thing.
I don't know how you inferred that you were supposed to feel pity for me based on my statement. I am not a depressed single woman, in case you needed clarification. Shame on you for not asking me my pronouns first.
Wars are largely fought by men. There are female warriors, but men make up the majority. Men are also physically more dominating, are more assertive, are more commanding, more adventurous. All things that add to being a dominant human more than a female would be. Just because there are examples of female domination does not mean that they tend to be the dominant group. The men are usually the ones in control and hold sway over decision making.
You are pointing to norms of one culture to dismiss norms of others. It doesnt work like that my friend. The roles you present as immutable are nothing of the sort.
If we look at a list of all the wars that have been documented, how many have been fought by men and how many have been fought by women? If a war included both men and women present as fighters, was the majority of men or women? If there was a war fought with armies containing women majorly, how many of those occurred as compared to the other two examples of possible army types in a war? The answers would agree with my claims. Documents of all wars would include all different cultures, and from what we have, wars are largely fought by men. You would have to come up with an alternative source that says otherwise.
I really don't know what support you are appealing to that negates what I've said. It is basic biology and psychology to know that men are usually stronger and more assertive and aggressive, and women tend to be more submissive and weaker.
Your logic is basically that because a group or person exists or possibly exists, that counters what I'm saying; but exceptions are not the rule. You keep on imposing that reasoning, and it doesn't work.
America is stronger with independent people who have control over their own lives.
This is such a vague statement in context of either supporting your side or negating mine.
There was a test done on horses and zebras. Male zebra has sex with female horse but does not impregnate the female. Later the female horse has sex with a male horse, and guess what, the offspring had stripes.
This is an old wives tales that has been disproven.
https://libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk/towardsdolly/2013/01/18/star-of-the-stripes/
I will look more into this and get back with you later.
SergeantLynch wrote:
Hey Skip.
You're already fantasising about me and I haven't even transitioned yet.
Which model would you prefer, double or triple inlet ports.
"My oh my," said Little Skip Riding Hood, "how many holes you have."
RoboLynch smiled and replied, "The better to f*** you with."
For all we know, BK is Asian. His skin tone is prized by other Asians
Well, most of science is witchcraft anyway. Its actually often amazing how many stupid things scientists believe in. I know they say science improves the world, but I really dont see that happening. the world is pretty much on a straight line of getting worse and worse.
Nature has already provided us what we need to reach the epitome of health. Big Pharma lies and claims their products are what you need and that these claims are backed by science.
SergeantLynch wrote:
Yeah but GODDO made fake fossils and all science is a load of bollocks and it deffo was a magic bloke what did it all 6000 years ago.
And custard monsters on the planet Foo Foo have fifty kilometre penises that ejaculate magic sperm into the FooFooian stratosphere, which GODDO harvested and used to create our solar system and planet Earth ...Yes GODDO is a mega-trifle that absorbs black holes and FooFooian semen, and shits solar systems and all life.
Yes the Big Bang was a colossal GOD fart.
Have faith FLRW.
don't let this guy start cults on the internet. I might sign up
FLRW wrote:
Well, I guess Kermos won't be showing up at our Big Bang Club!
You are always out at the club, aren't you? 🤔
The Big Bang Theory does not necessarily contrast Christianity. God could have started Creation from a single point of light--in reference to the first words of the Bible--and let the universe expand from that. The BBT can still reconcile with a Young-Earth worldview. God starts the universe from a singularity and adds to it in order with the six days of Creation.
Creating is like exporting and consuming is like importing.
Random thought: Dang, @SergeantLynch is coming in hot with the replies tonight! The man is everywhere on the site 🙌
SergeantLynch wrote:
It's okay, I don't need one
What...A sex robot or a fussy woman.
Ah 😅 I'll take one Woman™ please 2-day shipping, gift wrapped
SergeantLynch wrote:
It's a guy and if he produces sperm the he is gender bloke...He is simply "transcending" an old stereotype with a new one.
And yes BK, better to be an amoeba.
You should transfer your consciousness to a sex robot and find out if indeed he produces sperm.
Savant wrote:
It's all about the sixes: make six figures, be six feet, have six inches, and a six-pack
I mean, in more traditional relationships, only height and money really matter off the bat, since they're not gonna see your abs or know the size of your privates until you've been together for a while. And while those things do matter, I think you can still do okay without them if you play the numbers game (cast a wide net) and optimize stuff you can control like outfit/photo quality. I think most women would prefer a well-framed photo of a guy in a suit than a mirror shirtless pic.
I'll have to pay my local second rate suit store a visit, owned by hard working immigrant Indian. Hopefully I can haggle for a lower price, but Indians love to squeeze every cent out of you.
And then I'll make a nice photo of me. Backgrounds are important to me, so I have to think about the location.
SkepticalOne wrote:
Are you saying that the ideals are human constructs and/or they are silly contrived customs?
Ideals and customs are human constructs. Some are silly.
I disagree because some are instituted by God
The current feminist views have enabled women to feel a sense of superiority and entitlement over men.
Feminism has allowed women to glimpse equal status. Potato/potatho 😉
What does equal status look like in practice? Does anyone know? Women don't act the same way as men, but they'd hold the same positions and be viewed the same way? Women in politics lead with emotion as is known by their psychology which is not the best form of decision-making.
Majority of women didn't even support feminism when it started. In inception, prominent figures declared that feminism will succeed when the nuclear family is obliterated because feminism is meant to move women into the work force and away from a focus on family which is stupid to do because women are happiest when in marriage and having children. Elites largely funded the feminist movement without thinking about the repercussions it would have on society.
Now we have more depressed single women who regret not getting married because they're fed this lie that they need to focus on business and "male pursuits" to be viewed as equal. Now the average person has to make more money because the amount of workers has gone up by pushing more women into the workforce. Now more women do business in sexually exploiting themselves for money pursuits which is enabled by feminism. That's not good for society.
Women in America have more freedoms than ever, yet they claim to be severely oppressed. Victim identity has enabled entitlement and has hidden under virtue signaling behind this banner of ambiguous "equality" that is supposedly the goal.
Feminism has done so much good for society, so I see why you're a possible supporter of it.
When I said biologically with children in mind, there is a theory-
This is an unwarranted belief ...unless youre a fly. It has never been confirmed or observed in humans or mammals of any kind.
There was a test done on horses and zebras. Male zebra has sex with female horse but does not impregnate the female. Later the female horse has sex with a male horse, and guess what, the offspring had stripes.
It'd be hard to conduct scientific experiments on humans in this matter because of the ethics of it. Command the female test subject to have sex with Man A and then Man B and then become pregnant with Man C, wait to see what the genetics of the child constitute. It'd be frowned upon to have a study like this.
What do you mean by "domineering"? Men are by nature the dominant counterpart
I think you might be confusing culture with nature. Anthropology reveals matrilineal and female-led societies, female warriors, and women with primary authority.
Domineering describes someone who is bossy, arrogant, overbearing. Someone who tries to control other people with no consideration of their feelings. Being this type of person/partner would make marriage seem like slavery.
Wars are largely fought by men. There are female warriors, but men make up the majority. Men are also physically more dominating, are more assertive, are more commanding, more adventurous. All things that add to being a dominant human more than a female would be. Just because there are examples of female domination does not mean that they tend to be the dominant group. The men are usually the ones in control and hold sway over decision making.
When I said destroy, I meant ruin and degrade the statutes and ideals of the community.
The feminist movement has brought about terrible outcomes, and we can talk about that if you're interested
What community is that? Is it made up entirely of men? If not, then perhaps the ideals and statutes are incomplete.
The US society for example. What feminism has accomplished is anti-American, and American ideals and statutes are imperative to uphold.
SatanLucy wrote:
I think you can still do okay without them if you play the numbers game (cast a wide net)
Yeah, most people dont get that about relationships. there are actually women out there retarded enough to be with just about anyone. It doesnt matter how much you suck financially or in looks. there is always a woman out there who sucks way more than you. If nothing, you can always date a blind girl. She doesnt care for looks cuz she cant see. Just tell her you look like that terminator guy.
SatanLucy wrote:
I cant tell if thats a guy or girl in that gif.
I think it's a guy, but his cheerful cuteness transcends genders
SatanLucy wrote:
Women sometimes complain men are useless, so doing useful things would negate that idea in their eyes hopefully.
In life and in relationships with women, you can only be useful or useless. there is no 3rd option. I would say being useful is much better. Women have wants, and of course they gonna prefer a partner who achieves their wants, whatever those wants are, whether its good at conversation, good in bed, or having some money in the pocket to buy gifts, or all of these.
In order to be most wanted, you pretty much have to achieve most wants of others, or greatest wants. this means you first have to know what their wants are, and not confuse them with your wants.
Relationships are mutual fulfillment of wants, and one of greatest mistakes people make in relationships is only focusing on their own wants. Its sort of like walking into a shop and wanting to buy something but not wanting to pay for it. trade means both sides get something they want, not just one side. Same in relationships.
Different women want different things, but the principle remains the same. You still must be provider of things women want, to be wanted.
I will have to learn which wants of a woman I can appeal to best, and of those, which wants to prioritize
SatanLucy wrote:
Would work as a sex robot be liberation for the humanoid you think?
They should hurry up with making sex robots. Humanity needs them. We can no longer put up with having to chase fussy women.
It's okay, I don't need one
I really want to see the movie. I have seen so many clips on X. I am a fan of horror movies
Create more than you consume.
Avoid Nihilism.
Pieces of advice I have ascertained recently
It's not about the goals. It's about the peanut butter sandwiches we made along the way.
