Skipper

her husband had a micro-penis.

I hate micro penises. I cant even understand what is their purpose in the world other than to be laughed at.

Sorry to out you but don't u have one?

It's not the hoodie; it's the beady eyes that make you look shady.

and the waddle bc my pants are down at my knees--out of luck with no belt

Your black is blacker than most blacks.

My black is actually black compared to someone like Barack Obama who has a skin tone lighter than chocolate which people would say is brown which leaves me confused about what is actually black vs brown

Now you are using your opinion to support your opinion, which is just circular logic.

doesn't mean im wrong, anime demon

Though like I stated, their mask of deceit has slipped a few times....Something which they have not denied.

What has been revealed to you?

Yep, but a super-human who has lived forever somewhere in the void of nothingness, is as illogical as any other hypothesis.

You're right--that doesn't make sense. And yet it can still be true. What separates the hypotheses from others is its source of credibility and knowledge. We have a whole "book of books" dedicated to this stance on the universe. Why would the Bible not make sense as a revelation of truth?

ISI though is a different issue. Whereby the seeds of life were planted on a suitable planet or suitable planets by an evolved Intergalactic Super-Intelligence...Which may or may not have once been humanesque in organic form, but was most probably a programmed intergalactic seeding device/machine that visited Earth...Though it's unlikely that rudimentary lifeforms were left with a book of divine instruction.

What is the support for this? What makes this more likely than Jesus Christ being the King?

And survival and proliferation has always necessitated that which you might refer to as iniquity.

Yes, because what is necessary to survive eventually in an imperfect world? You have to suffer, you have to hurt, you have to deceive for self-preservation. I think it's tragic the beauty of the world is stained with these ruthless but practical methods.

With that in mind, it comes as a big shock that Jesus Christ flipped that upside down. Sacrifice and propitiation are what God supplied for us, and we don't have to repay Him for that. That story of the Bible, it's like what is self-sustaining about that? Dying on the cross for supposed miraculous victory. It doesn't agree with your outlook.

I have to figure out how is it important and truthful beyond what you are saying?

There'd have to be an end goal beyond survival in the physical world.

I guess my question from me to you is "why do you believe survival in the physical world is the end goal?" "Why is there nothing beyond that?"

It's easy to get along with sensible people.

Yeah, and I sometimes I wonder where they are. Is common sense so common?

Sometimes I realize I'm the nonsensible one which hits like a speeding bus these days. But I grow ever better from recognizing my faults 💪

In my mind, a phenomenon. His reach is beyond human. He represents ideas and concepts. He is an embodiment of creative bullshit and sharp wit and, periodically, cold truth.

He is a force to be reckoned with but still innocent and child-like enough to live a mundane life, save for his online media which showcases a deep introspective life.

I think God is a reasonable explanation for the important inquiries we have about life and existential uncertainties.

But, unpack what is God through what we are revealed in life. In linguistic terms, asking "why is the grass green" and someone answering with "God" is not indicative of a pursuing mind--a mind that wants to find the answers through science. It'd be blunt and not substantial. Use critical thinking for questions.

One could still answer with "God" for the color of grass, but there are natural laws to discover and theories to make about the world bc they categorize reality into something we can understand and use to model the universe.

Add reasonable explanation for why grass is green bc of God. It can still be logical in the right context

You're saying one would be naive to use God as the "fill in the blank" answer for what is unknown.

I think God is a reasonable explanation for the important inquiries we have about life and existential uncertainties.

One does not talk to electrical devices...Unless they stop working and do not respond to a change of fuse, then one needs to be temporarily profane.

I am profane with Rocket League teammates sometimes. Then I decide to ragebait and score for the other team bc if u can't beat em, join em.

Plus, I am neither shy nor afraid to talk with people of the other gender...(There being only two proper genders) Mix and match folk are what they are and I will also happily chat with them about the weather, but I am not interested in either their mental health issues nor their sexual angst.

I am pleased that I have always remained in good standing with females. I have close friendships with women my age at my institution. My earliest memories contain my best friends who happened to be females for some reason. I always got along well with them.

If your hair is going to fall out and stop growing it will, despite how good you think you might be..

I don't plan on balding. I've been equipped with the right information and how to care for myself. I've only noticed improvement since applying my updated understanding

For sure...Evolution is such...And righteousness evolved out of hormones and procreation.

No, it didn't. Righteousness is a divine concept.

*it's hard not to think of him as what I believe he is

I don't always think of him as a daft kid with messy Popeye arms, sitting for hours in front of a screen masturbating regularly and doing daft kid things.

But demigod they are not.

It's hard to think of him as what I believe he is, but in realistic terms he could be something else entirely. Like how I believe "balls to the wall" is a sexual euphemism, even though the phrase has a completely different meaning and origin

I bet that cat in your pfp will keep a body full of hair until the day it passes away. Balding occurs in unnatural circumstances like the western society where we are spoonfed all sorts of "healthy" crap that is negating our health. Meanwhile native Africans have perfect white teeth and head full of hair just living off the land.

Which seems to causing you some angst, despite what you say to the contrary.

Well, after changing my hair care system I have noticed healthier hair and vellus hairs popping up, so I must be doing something right in the opposite direction of balding.

And GOD is a creation and existence hypothesis by the way, and therefore is not concerned with the appearance of coincidental organisms.

what is your God hypothesis?

Pacifism as an ideology isn't opportunistic, it's the belief that war is wrong no matter what. So if you argue that successfully, then it won't matter to pacifists in the US or China or anywhere whether their enemies have become pacifists, they still won't fight.

i see that now.

The thought experiment was that you are a philosopher listened to by a global audience and don't know exactly which countries will be evil in the future.

Okay, I should’ve looked at it that way. I don’t think global pacifism could be achieved. Some groups would listen and would see no justification for war. But other groups are too greedy. They want too much and will be pragmatists instead of pacifists and can justify war as a means to an end

Damn it, I should’ve said “Nigga.” Now Debby will know I’m

not black

With your black and white. It must be hard for you to blend in with either groups.

You have never heard of Mixed Privilege. I can say the N-word without being black. I can commit crimes in broad daylight on video and people will still defend me saying “well, we don’t know what happened before the video started.”

With my whiteness, I can stuff AA batteries in my pocket without nearly all employees keeping one eye on me cause I’m “wearing a hoodie that makes me look shady”

No comment

😱

Mahatma Gandhi was a pacifist and was successful at getting the British to withdraw from India that ended the colonization of India.

Yeah, that counters what I was saying because the British were willing to kill or beat them I think. They might’ve beat some of them if I remember.

I was meaning more with the world powers that have militaries and are currently violent in some capacities. Ghandi didn’t have world military powers at his disposal. Would the U.S. army become pacifist if they knew North Korea superpower was still in active domination mode? That’s my point, and I don’t think U.S. army would concede being a superpower in warfare

He murmurs to me in my dreams. Tells me to serve Kim John UNO and drink more apple juice

God wants me to be my best. I don’t think aggressive thinning at 20 is my peak. I’m using the tools of the natural world to heal. Dirty blond locks are imminent, trust me.

It’s annoying rn that hair grows so slow. I can see all along my hairline the new baby hairs that are coming back, but it’s gonna take some months for them to mature so my hairline kind of looks the same rn. Once the hairs are terminal, then I can further revitalize my hairline. I will have luscious locks!!

That's your opinion.

That’s a cop out, u filthy succubus

My roommate would say I’m just a fruity friend, but he doesn’t have any idea what he’s talking about. Like, he would know if I’m g@y

I find it hard to believe that while he was living with his parents, Joseph did not teach him carpentry. It was common for a child to form an apprenticeship with a parent to learn the craft. That’s basic sense in giving children valuable skills to make a living

I'm saying that whatever message you have will be filtered through propaganda. If you say "x, y, z justifies war" then the Nazis will tell people that the Polish did x, y, z and so they need to go to war. But if you tell everyone to be die-hard pacifists, then it will be hard to convince them to fight for anything.

Are you saying for all world leaders to tell their people to be pacifists? I’m wondering which group the message should be told to first. Should it start in the terrorist groups or in a place like the U.S. or in China? I think people would be unwilling to be pro-pacifist if they see their enemy hasn’t agreed to be pro-pacifist yet

It’s obvious you like your feathers ruffled or even stained.

From time to time

I also have over 2098 mentions unlike your 182 mentions. Indication nobody reads your posts.

I did the math and in comparison to comments and mentions, only 50% of your comments have produced a mention while over 70% of my comments have produced a mention, meaning people consistently reply back to me more than you.