TheAnalyticalAdvocate's avatar

TheAnalyticalAdvocate

Member since

TheAnalyticalAdvocate
Yea. I honestly am not trying to do anything shady. In my new debate I have set up I put it in the description. I just honestly didn’t think much of it, because they honestly let it be used for academic use now. There were stricter rules in the past due to it possibly being used to cheat. But they found AI checkers aren’t that accurate and have lead to a lot of false claims for students cheating so they allow it now in universities in the manner I used it. That’s honestly why I didn’t think much about it. Professors are starting to be ok with it, as long as it meets a certain criteria. You can tell mainly though because if you use AI alone to write stuff it will be wildly inaccurate in a lot of cases. But I will put it in the description whether it will be used or not from now on.
TheAnalyticalAdvocate
I actually can’t wait to read this debate. I use to be a heavy Christian, but now I kind of am unsure. With my degree path being hard research and the fact I publish papers, it makes it difficult to believe. I guess because I go on what can be measured and tangible. I do have interest in both sides though because I remain unsure about myself and my religious beliefs lol!
TheAnalyticalAdvocate
You can do what you feel is right, but AI is actually starting to be generally acceptable in most settings. For example universities have actually started to allow the use of AI in the manner I used it in. What they do is allow you to use it if it’s your original thoughts and it is just used as an editing tool. It’s generally permissible in research writing as well. I’m a peer review researcher in areas similar to this debate topic and I speak at research conferences. I can prove it as well, but they allow AI in the way I used it. I really had just been viewing this debate in a similar way to academic writing. Granted I am green to debate, so if it is frowned upon in the community then I am happy to just use AI research tools. And no hard feelings lol! If the community is a certain way on it then it is what it is.
TheAnalyticalAdvocate
It was a good debate. I won’t argue in the comments, but I was accused of using AI. I use AI as an editing tool. Using AI for plagiarism wouldn’t have gotten the framework I did. I don’t want people to walk away thinking that the comments, research, and framework I did throughout this debate wasn’t my own. I put too much work in for that lol! Anyway I hope that you have a good day.
TheAnalyticalAdvocate
I will have my reply ready soon. I’m a grad school student, which is why replies have been longer, yet inconsistent. I also have a four month old lol! Anyway hand shake across the isle before we both end this lol! Thanks for being my first debate back after a long break lol!