So is Remy completely off the hook or does he get slapped with a temp ban?
*as Pro points out
*is not a violation of another person's rights as long as they
I might vote on this sometime in the next couple of days. Either way, looking over Pro's Round 1 I'm impressed by the level of analysis employed here. Flow charts, statistical breakdowns of RemyBrown's post history, the whole nine yards. This is how you make your case.
(Edit: Having reached the bottom I now see the AI disclaimer, but even so the information was presented well.)
I have shown incredible restraint in the face of relentless stupidity.
-Someone very wise
Oops, I forgot to link to my sources.
Federalist 68:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed68.asp
Federalist 69:
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed69.asp
(Also, in hindsight that probably should've read "paragon and prophet".)
To maybe clear up the confusion, how do you define “support”? Do you mean not criticizing the president? Siding with him on policy matters?
Because it seems self-evident to me that you can vocally disapprove of the president while still being a law-abiding citizen. Are you saying that a critic of the president is, at heart, a disloyal citizen?