If your ChatGPT 5 is so skilled with language, give it this and report back it's translation:
My IQ is just 142, but I know exactly how this reads, as does the scribe who originally wrote it over 3,000 years ago.
You can even give it the transliteration:
anet' hra - k suten suteniu neb nebu heq hequ thet taui
Is AI capable of designing, manufacturing, maintaining and calibrating its product manufacturing machine and to perform all that for the measurement tools it is going to need to also use in its manufacturing process?
Don't bother trying to bullshit an answer, because I already know the failure of all that performance by AI, and all that is going to be required of it to manufacture in a world-class environment to completely replace all humans.
How does a device recognize pattern when it has not yet conceived design to stet the process? Has AI ever created completely new knowledge? Nope, not yet. I've not yet seen that AI can think outside the box and it is going to have to know how to do that with initial programming in order to approach or be a human.
The issue of US flag-burning is settled Supreme Court precedent from two cases; Texas v. Johnson [1989] and U.S. v. Eichman [1990], both ending in 5-4 decisions that U.S. flag burning is protected freedom of expression as a 1A principle. Both cases were in the Rehnquist Court with the same Justices finding for and against in each case. An interesting side note: no case has ever been tried wherein someone, either the flag burner, or another person, was injured due to flag-burning. That would be an interesting case in view of free speech being curtailed in the case of yelling "fire" in a crowded place due to potential injury of a person.
Yes, it is for me.
Nope. "System" implies codified standards. Show me a single, current, legal statute ,or Giov't sept policy, that currently expresses racism. That there are racist individuals within government, yes, I agree, but that is not systemic unless you can demonstrate it by current codified law or policy. That there are historic examples, I already knew there are. I am talking about today. 9/15/2025, since you allege we have a systemic issue today..
Go.
All may be true relative to his knowledge, but that does not modify the assessment that John was not referring to an entire set of books, or scrolls, but only his own. He did not say "books," did he? No, the object of his sentence is "book," a first-person singular noun, elven in both Hebrew and Greek, not to be construed with Mathew, Mark, and Luke, nor the O.T. separate writings.
Because God created everything that exists, then atheists too were created by God.
"Because" must be absolutely true, and your "because" is only partially so. My parents had direct cause in my creation, while God's involvement specifically in each of us is secondly, at best. That's the way he designed the system. But, sconce the brain, even at birth, is not yet in full, developmental function, and will not be for the ensuing 25 years, Atheists, in effect, create themselves, just as believers do.
typical if/then logic is shit, itself.
Misuse of "if," which automatically implied that the "if" statement is currently not true, which it never is. That's how to begin a logical statement? Nope.
The proper constructions is "because/then". Get it?
If, as you say, your so called "moral advisor" guides you to elect and support an immoral, lawless leader, then your moral advisor is shit.
Which is why typical if/then logic is shit, itself.
Misuse of "if," which automatically implied that the "if" statement is currently not true, which it never is. That's how to begin a logical statement? Nope.
The proper constructions is "because/then". Get it?
My moral advisor is Jesus Christ. He does not advise election of anybody because that is entirely my choice, and he respects my agency of free will.
bullshit
“Race is a social construct, scientists argue. Racial categories are weak proxies for genetic diversity and need to be phased out. ‘[Racial constructs] is a concept we think is too crude to provide useful information… that has social meaning that interferes in the scientific understanding of human genetic diversity…’ says Michael Yudell, a professor of public health at Drexel University… What the study of complete genomes from different parts of the world has shown is that even between Africa and Europe, for example, there is not a single absolute genetic difference, meaning no single variant where all Africans have one variant and all Europeans another one, even when recent migration is disregarded.”
From Scientific American, 2/5/2016
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/
Is there more for God to reveal to us not yet revealed to us in any holy writ we currently possess? Of just the Holy Bible, there is statement in Revelation:
“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of prophecy of this book: if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.” [Holy Bible [KJV] Revelation 22: 18, 19
To what “book” did John refer? Was he aware, when writing his “book,” Revelation, that it would, one day, not stand alone, but would be added to 65 other books to comprise a book whose title, Holy Bible, was equally unknown to John? Yes, he did not know it. His reference forbidding addition to the book was to his book, only; Revelation, and not the entire canonized volume, the Holy Bible.
We cannot take it upon ourselves to limit what God will reveal to us in the past, at present, or to come. We do not yet possess all that God will reveal to us, and he will do so on his schedule, whatever that is, and not ours.
Last week, all week, the edit function in Forum, trying to edit a post I made, failed, as well, by the same means SergeantLynch mentioned, but today, having just posted a comment on a new post by a member, I tested, and the edit failure notice popped up on a change, but the edit was successful, anyway. Something is definitely up with that edit function.
Who is "we," who "know free will cannot exist?" You and your windsock puppet?
Because lack of free will is "logical," according to the two of you, pls. demonstrate the logic. Your claim; your BoP.
To be a sniper you need special guns only used by the military.
Since the guy is still at large, and even though a rifle has been found, who knows of it was the shooter's weapon, or not, and not notice that I've seen identifying the make/model of the weapon. Is an "assault weapon?" And who has ever defined what that is?
Well, he did get God to show that prayer doesn't work.
Prayer works. Some answers take more time to be heard.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/330/1/
Today, the “separation of church and state” is interpreted as forbidding mention of God in pubic schools, or conducting prayer, even by one's self in silence, when the Everson case [1947’s Everson v. Board of Education] found"
“…that although the United States government cannot promote religion, it also cannot be religion’s adversary.”
I'm just glad the 49ers started the season on point.
"We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"
So, how do justice, tranquility, common defense, general welfare, and the blessings of liberty achieve "a more perfect union?"
Do you have a more reasoned response to a present, for an utterly lacking crime response other than a %#$#^ ban?
What's it gong to be, Democrats? Do you have a more reasoned response to a present, for an utterly lacking crime response other than a %#$#^ ban?
How about something original? There's nothing about woke that is.
Effectively, just about anything we eat of an originally solid nature [not soup broth, for example] that actually requires chewing, ends up being a paste before swallowing.
It never ceases to amaze me that, at least 11 years ago, Trump was bestowed the moniker of "Bone Spurs" by a jealous media that an ordinary person of wealth was given a draft deferment in the period of 1964 - 1973, when more than half of people eligible for military draft were given draft deferment. So, why Trump? Because he was wealthy? Because he dared enter politics at a presidential level without a background in politics? As if that pursuit is the Holy Grail. Because his ideas didn't conform to the media's idea of proper governance? As if the media deserves to have that kind of oversight. Because he was not a moral man? And who is of presidential pursuit? Thanks, but I already have a moral advisor, and he's been around a lot longer that any other moral advisor around, and so do y'all, whether y'all realize it and appreciate it, or not. We don't needs one in the presidency.
Trump is not responsible for the speech of anyone else, so lose that criticism now. As for results of his 2nd term, we are in a better economy now than Biden ever had. If you're not participating in that yourself, that's your issue to resolve. Can't help you, there; a matter of personal investment.
How? "Potential" is defined by the OED as something that exists only in future possibility; a statistical matter of future, not present. Very seldom does something of potential having 100% probability, whereas reality is a 100% known present condition and is, therefore, but by ignorance, limited to potential.
How? "Potential" is defined by the OED as something that exists only in future possibility; a statistical matter of future, not present. Very seldom does something of potential having 100% probability, whereas reality is a 100% known present condition and is, therefore, but by ignorance, limited to potential.
What if Hilbert and Poincaré, sincere in their beliefs, brut misguided, like folks who thought, or still think, that the universe is geocentric? EWe had "proof" of it a few centuries ago, and people still believe it today. But, again, that's the distinction of belief and faith, and faith is how things, like eternal life, can be known to be true, because true faith only leads to truth. Now, faith is a bit like humility; as soon as you declare it for yourself, you're not. It is not a matter of personal pride.
What makes you think he's not here frequently, and is either disguised or not visible, but still able to work with people in the effort of building his kingdom? Perhaps if more people felt his near presence because they want him to be near, and not loose their heads like Democrats who thought Trump was dead for not seeing him for 3 days, we'd be much better off as individuals and society.
infinite cannot exist in reality?
life is infinite.
debts and debtors is commerce.
trespass is activity to be forgiven.
not baloney; it's called righteous civilization.
