okay you're pro life but you justify Israel bombing children, makes totally sense. Socialists and Communists aren't even religious, Israel is not their homeland unless their grandparents were from Palestine, and you continue justify its existence and denying what is happening in Gaza and West Bank. You're not a pro life, you're pro birth
what the fuck
re reading now, I wrote accidentally given me the antisemitism in my argument, mistake of mine
buddy what's the matter now with abortions. killing a fucking 5 years old makes you a baby killer, removing a fetus makes you a person who gave abortion, don't start with useless argument about abortions and the infanticide
no problem, I don't debate with baby killers, for me case closed. study what is antisemitism and antizionism
* I'd like to add also that in my whole lifetime here in Italy I don't even know the appearance of a soldier, at Haifa I had children telling me what was their appearance
In every Nation is protected a minority chosen by government. In Israel are protected the same minorities as the Us as long as I know, but for example Haredim in Israel are shouted in streets by people and in Jerusalem I saw an attack on a group of Haredim made by the army itself, and yet Israel is the safest nations for jewish people. In Turkey I saw Haredim walking in the streets without any problem living as normal people. I guess that Israel is safe only for lgbtqia+ people but not for Arabs and Haredims
you could at least tried to change ai words. opinion rejected
yes I was referring to the express your vote, but the previous comment didn't take your at. could you vote?
it didn't take the pin...
sounds bad but, could you express your vote when you can?
thank you for the advice, fixed it
meant as state organization for its inhabitants
understood, but how does it seem for you?
just asking, if ultracrepidarian's voting comment isn't sufficient enough, it won't be valid anymore?
of course, my bad
ok ai detected opinion rejected, report at least all of the quotes lol
share the one for Einstein. the Links you provided said the things that you wrote, except you entered only the parts you wanted lmfao
"Heliocentrism is preferred because it works better for the atheistic agenda." at least be honest that you didn't even contextualize the thing
answer sincerely, have you ever even opened a Hubble's book? try at least mimicking the lecture without bringing up things that doesn't exist.
are you fucking serious? it's ridiculous, you want convince someone that studies and dives in science every single day to believe in a something that wants to prove the wrong about something observed for hundred of years. cells have the potential. about morality, I brought up Hume theories for a reason, you want kant's demonstration? fine, I'll try but it's simply ridiculous that you don't accept the answers
from my heart I'm amazed I haven't had an answer yet, let me know if you need some clarification about something in the argument, feel free to ask
oh okay I understand ty
what do you mean by "all powerful being" and "maximum power and maximally great"? I'm genuinely confused
would it be okay to just do the argument I missed?
!!!only SomeDebatePerson can accept this draft!!!
my bad I was making the argument, couldn't make it in time I was rushing, is it okay to write it down here?
why this could be useful for us in your opinion? I'm just asking 'cause I'm just very confused...
it must exists because it does lol, what's even the purpose of the question
there is no such thing as thinking "why the universes must exist?", it exists. stop it. why ask us these questions which themselves don't make sense at all? it is metaphysics shit, it's useless to even ask. Universe exists, that's all we know and what we NEED to know.
