That's how Clinton destroyed Bush also. He really did a better job at appealing to the average Joe while Bush was clearly out of touch.
That's how Clinton destroyed Bush also. He really did a better job at appealing to the average Joe while Bush was clearly out of touch.
Mamdani shouldn't be mayor because Muslims are not loyal to America or American interests and their ideology is also antithetical to the American way of life and political philosophy.
With that out of the way. He has directly opposed a long term New York policy of rounding up the homeless when extreme temperature could cause them to die. Past mayors have forced them inside by any means necessary to preserve their lives.
However in America we should be prioritizing freedom even over the preservation of life. Homeless people have a right to sleep outside, even in dangerous situations. Yes it's okay to apply gentle pressure to get them safe but forcing them to sleep inside goes against this national values of freedom.
Mamdani actually gets it right in this one situation. I'm also going to say it. There is nothing wrong with government funded grocery stores in food deserts. The problem is if they give themselves different rules than private grocery stores allowing them shelves any unfair market advantages.
Us regular folks can literally see our tax refunds soon and literally see they are bigger than before. Meaning taxes were cut so we overpaid by more than normal. I think my wife got 3k under Biden and now she is getting 7k under trump. I don't know why Democrats think they can lie about reality when they know we can see how much taxes we pay and it's more clear during refund time. They know they are lying because they are seeing bigger returns as well. The refunds will still get higher as well because the plan is to replace the income tax with tarrifs.
Since you are against picking and choosing values based on feels I will assume you are catholic or Orthodox and not some heathen protestant
or he is a legitimate madman in which case there is no way you can rationally justify supporting him.
The alternative was supporting the time using lawfare against political opponents which is something that should never ever be done.nthere is a reason why the neocons never prosecuted Clinton for rape or why Obama never went after bush for war crimes. The opposition was a left who literally tried to end free speech is on the streets rioting right now because they want an open border policy and turning the entire nation into what LA is with skid row and all because copy pasting policies will always get you the same results the last policies got you
What they’re more likely to do is to stop trusting the US and start taking measures to reign in on their dependency on us, which China or Russia will likely benefit from.
Why? Why not just make the move that benefits them the most instead?
Keep in mind I have been divorced so I know who wins when it's the reasonable person vs some unreasonable cold hearted narcissistic succubus in a negotiation
So is Norway more likely to budge if they think it's somebody who actually cares about the novel prize that much or are they more likely to budge against a reasonable negotiater?
The cause of high prices is that the patient doesn't see the prices. It's between the hospital and the insurance company. Now it was FDRs wage controls that caused employers to start offering medical. Prices jumped dramatically after that.
So my theory is that market interventionism caused this to happen. Why would we do market interventionism again by offering free healthcare and expect no negative consequences for that? Besides it's proven that despite healthcare being more expensive, Americans get better medical treatment. We might be trading that for a single payer system
The arguments against us having better healthcare are all misleading. I just want to preempt them. We have worse health outcomes because Americans just generally eat a more shitty diet which RFK is working to fix, and Americans tend to sit on their ass more often.
When you look at how fast you get taken care of in emergency visits or how likely you are to survive a heart attack in an American hospital or even cancer, Americans have better outcomes due to our superior healthcare . So why even mess with the current system?
Here is an article exploring much of my thoughts process here but does not go as far as I do
https://fee.org/articles/if-american-healthcare-kills-european-healthcare-kills-more/
New name suggestions
Orange land
Gold land
Red white and blue land
Restricting the right to vote based on race, gender, or IQ is contrary to the principles of democratic equality and fundamental human rights, as recognized by international law and modern democracy
So essentially globo-homo doesn't like it. Noted
That word is spelled wilted.
Reported
Too long didn't read but only white males with an IQ above 140 should be able to vote
When I was younger I started a rap band. My rap names were king tutt and at one time just the word "fuck". Also food stamp when I got more into gangsta rap. Anyway I started a recorded company wylted records. The symbol was a wylted flower. I was partially influenced by horrorcore so wylted is means dead flower. So now my name reminds me of that part of my childhood
My mom, I tricked her into taking an IQ test recently. She got a 75. I certainly hope my intelligence comes from my dad
At the end of the day, thoughts and prayers are worth fu*k all.
Numerous studies have shown quite the opposite, but correct they should be followed up with relocations of Muslims and Jews away from white areas. We 100% agree
Your examples account for a few million dollars out of a $7T budget. That’s not even enough to qualify as a rounding error.
It would be rather tedious for me to create a one million page PDF for you.
Yes, it turns out that leading the free world is a complex job that requires an interest and capacity in nuance. Welcome to the real world.
Not really just ideological purity. Several decades of philosophical argumentation and reasoning to acquire the best philosophy and then apply it consistently.
You don’t have any content there, all you have are right wing labels depicting these programs as caricatures of what they actually are and what they were actually for. But you wouldn’t know that because you wouldn’t even bother to look into them.
How were those things in the list mischaracterized?
I am not a sand ni663r. I think I will pass. Thoughts and prayers are with them
No, that's silly. First of all native Americans have every right to be here as do an African American descended from slaves
God is just. This means that sin cannot go without punishment. Only the most innocent being ever would be a worthy sacrifice for the sheer amount of sin that ever was or will be. That Being is God
RemyBrown is back and immediately pushes misogyny and lowering the age of consent to 0. This is extremely legally and morally problematic to be enabling. Just permanently ban him or something.
I think there is a button to not see posts from people who are controversial. I listed myself as being in that category so people could opt out of my posts so if he doesn't share that category with me than maybe force him into it somehow and then block it
Race is a deeply relevant and frequently central factor in politics, influencing governance, policy-making, and voter behavior across different contexts
I stopped reading here because it doesn't take long to recognize post as AI generated. I won't judge you for broken English or if you have an issue clarifying your thoughts, but I just will only respond to posts from you going forward. The reason being is that I already have chat GPT premium so I can just interact with him off the site. I saw an earlier post that wasn't AI generated and I can tell you are quite bright, so there is no reason to hide that
Why should race be relevant?
It shouldn't be but let's deal with reality
You got what you asked for. These are essentially late 90s democrats who believed in color blindness and you called them racist for so long that you made your bed. Deal with it
He could just say nothing or point to where he can come to agreement with them instead of doing some sort of purity test. I understand he wants to expand the party but he is sitting out potential allies and he doesn't realize the left is beyond help. The Monty Hall python is now trending on Twitter because leftists are literally too dumb to grasp abstract reasoning and insist the problem is wrong
Vivek Ramaswamy just posted this 
What he doesn't understand is that conservatism and capitalism dies without a white majority and cultural dominance and this requires some amount of abandoning the silly belief that all humans are merely interchangeable economic units and that we can just swap random Americans for random Indians and get the same results.
Culture matters, race matters and we are not merely interchangeable economic units and the libertarians within the movement need to understand that to live in a free and prosperous country that they must get comfortable being around mostly white people and either dropping their racism towards whites or dropping their midguided beliefs that we are merely interchangeable economic units. Liberals dropped the silly belief already and it's time for conservatives to follow suit
And thanks to mathematical sets, Roger is now real.
Show the mathematical sets you used. Unless this is satire. Which if it is satire meant to criticize math. Please explain why you don't believe in math
You don't need to look at why those things are instituted. You have all the context you need there. It would be tedious to look at everything and in a direct democracy none of those things would have passed the sniff test.
As for eliciting an emotional reaction. It should. We are literally doomed if we do not get spending under control. It is fraud in the sense that the wasteful spending is intentional. Just so a cost benefit analysis. We know it harms society as a hole to do anything on that list I posted, and yet it's done for some apparent reason. That's evil
Math doesn't support the characteristics of just any God. It would have to be the tri Omni God. You can't show math proving a trip on I God and then randomly say Zeus is real. The Christian God is potentially real as is the Buddhist interpretation of what God is and a few other cultures but the proven existence of God only relates to a few
Is the one on the left a before picture and the one on the right after?