GajarMooli

I had a reason for writing "stupid"

>> my votes were removed for not pleasing the mod, and it's ironical because the same mods are allowing people like Remmy Brown to do whatever he wants on this site. To call out the double Standards isn't ad-hominem. And that person clearly called me 'stupid', for calling out mods, and not something I actually did wrong.

I had a reason to write 'Israel'

>> everyone removing my comment happened to be from Israel or pro Israel, nothing 'racist' here, I didn't mean it in the 'antisemitic' way, I simply stated that if my opinion doesn't 'please' some 'certain type' of people, it gets removed.

No Votes are better than Noise,

>> Buddy I fully agree, why didn't you tell this to me earlier. I just got my wording different,

the site is better off dead = the site is better off without any activity = the site is better off without any votes = the site is better off without any noise

See, we are talking about the same things. And again, what exactly is 'noise', who decided that my analysis of a topic accounts as "trash or Noise" and another guy you personally live, casts a vote, and his analysis is "Beautiful thesis, capable of making headlines' ?

They can just say in the comments who won

>> translation:- the good guys can use the voting feature which will determine the outcome of a debate, the lesser humans can comment and be happy that they were involved.

I have read

1. God Delusion, and Sapiens

2. Bible(selective verses)

3. Quran(Selective verses)

4. Gita, RamcharitManas (Complete)

5. Vedas(selective)

6. Torah, starting chapters and some other selective verses

7. Lesser and Higher key of solomons(selecrive)

8. Buddhism(complete book on it, by a monk)

I have watched

1. 15+ Alex O Connor Videos

2. Many Indian Atheists, Logical Aayam(PhD in Biomolecules), The Indian Atheist(Business Man), The Englishator(PhD holder, and teacher)

3. Long Biology Lectures on Reproduction, Life Processes, genetics and a lot more

4. Despite being of maths background, I have studied evolution till senior secondary grade through lectures.

5. I have attended the philosophy course from MIT, which was available for free online.

I casted my votes on Biological, and phil

Sir if I am missing something which I need to earn a PhD in Voting Certificate from you then please enlighten me !!

The mods are very biased, they would remove a vote if it doesn't please them, but they will keep a radical person on this site, if he pleases them enough

Ad-Hominem on a site meant for intellectual debating

👏👏👏

Not taking anything seriously

I don't take anything online seriously

Everything is just text, I am anonymous

You are anonymous

People are just a bunch of stupid lines online

That's why I am writing all this, If it were in offline setting I wouldn't give a f, and move on. But it's online so I am just calling it out, cause it needs to be called out.

Yeah dude, you got it right. 2 whole debates, 6 long paragraphs, and all of you getting pissed off underneath, all of you guys were absent at the time of voting. I was fully active for a week or 2, and I was fully active in that duration. On debate art, I had a different name and I won 3 out of 4 of my debates, with 1 debate being a draw, because apparently nobody voted !

When you debate, either you get a stupid opponent

Nobody Votes

There's someone who is actually voting

Some stupid moderator from Israeli , or whatever takes away your vote because.... because... I AM THE MODE I CAN DO THAT lololool

Seriously 3 of my votes were removed, and you know how many votes I casted ? 3 !!

Idiots I am not some belly dancer on a stage who is supposed to please your taste in votes !! I am not asking you to decide which vote is a worthy one and which isn't.

How much stupid is that, you ask for a vote and then decide if a vote is worthy or not ?

Stupid mods, your site is better off dead

Just recording your greatest questions about existence and uploading them online is a fun thing ig.

If Humans put a why to everything, then there shouldn't be any axioms na ?

That's the point. Why does things with consciousness want to live ? Why is the state of non existence defines everything that revolves around life

Why is misery wrong ? We assume it to be an axiom in modern debates. But on a universal scale, why do humans need to avoid misery ? Why doesn't a lifeless object like a rock doesn't care about existence and living beings like us care for it ?

Just like Humans have masochists,

You are the masochist of a demon !

First of all I am back, seems like the mods have changed the UI. It's worthy to give it a 2nd try

Now coming to the topic

Demons have a fundamental right to eat humans

I will prove that by relating it to already established points

Pain is wrong

We all know that pain is wrong

But pain is wrong for us, personally, only us, a small fraction of the universe and what's on earth.

Yet there are sadists, masochists even among humans.

And other animals do even more filthy things.

So that raises a question, is pain actually wrong or everyone who doesn't fit in our definition of pain and related terms is wrong ?

What is pain ?

The answer science gave, an evolutionary thing, which tells a certain spectrum of living organisms to feel fear, and run.

Snake causes pain, fear it, next time you see it, RUN !

You fell from 2 stairs, ouch ! You fell from 5 !! Aaaahhhh ! Don't ever go above ground level again !

Everything that revolves around life, dopamine(anime, social media, sex), sadness, happiness, nervousness. Every single feeling. Is developed. Developed as in a lab, a big lab, the universe.

And these developments order us, PROTECT LIFE !! You will die ? Have sex, here, made it interested for you.

Afterall science is done with everything, we get a very vague and unsatisfactory answer to why is life. You live, just because you live and you are ordered to live. Even if some of you are sucidal, the majority will continue to live, or atleast want to live.

We don't know, who told us this. Why are we like that. We just live like an obedient dog to the king.

If we can't know, why to live. Why to eat. Why is pain truly wrong.

Then it's the logical conclusion from human perspective that we can't know why are demons killing and eating humans. It's not wrong.

For the stationary universe, humans will to cling to life and demons' desire to end it are the same things. Both can't be explained.

If living is a fundamental right of a human, who doesn't know why to live

Killing is the fundamental right of a demon who doesn't know why to kill

My college life is tough, and it keeps on getting tougher

To maintain my sanity I use Social Media and entertainment

Youtube, Anime, Chess, Debate Craft.

Each of these platforms requires some energy from me, to be used.

Debate Craft particularly takes quite a lot of time, to check it again and again.

And then there's no activity. No votes, nobody's accepting my debates.

I did one debate, and my opponent was very stupid.

It isn't just worth the effort for me.

It's an apology statement, you can say. For Ghosting my current going on debates.

I hope this site gains more members in the future and becomes a better place

Why is nobody voting on my debate with that trans Dragon ?

How will this site remain functional if nobody's going to vote ?

I should be made necessary for people to make atleast one vote a week.

My reply followed mathematical constraints mostly, and reality constraints because just adding a few more days can get pas 1 trillion USD. Definitely I will live a happy life with one more day, 2 more days and my upcoming generations won't have to do any work. But life will get monotonous then.

I will wait for 10 days. Let's go for a gamble(a gamble with risk tending to 0) . I mean if there's a possibility that it will disappear after 1000 years or 10,000 years too. See, I am going ro limit it to Let's say 100 years, no Let's just go for 100 days. It's a Given that it can disappear at any day, on day 1 there's a 1% unlucky chance. On day 2 it's either it disappeared on day 1 already or it disappeared on the very day 2. So there's a 2% unlucky Chance. Similarly on day 8, there's a 8% unlucky factor. But wait, the constraints say that there's no time limit!!

So let's do a thought experiment, I will consider 100 years, and it disappears in any year, possibility is same.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .... 100th year(1% chance of failure)

1 2 3 4 5 6 6 8 ..... 1000th(0.1% chance of failure)

And the number tends to 0

I picked 10 days to not crash the world economy.

Satan Lucy's argument shows a lack of Knowledge of probabilities. It's a poor argument, which is mathematically inaccurate

I will wait for 10 days. Let's go for a gamble(a gamble with risk tending to 0) . I mean if there's a possibility that it will disappear after 1000 years or 10,000 years too. See, I am going ro limit it to Let's say 100 years, no Let's just go for 100 days. It's a Given that it can disappear at any day, on day 1 there's a 1% unlucky chance. On day 2 it's either it disappeared on day 1 already or it disappeared on the very day 2. So there's a 2% unlucky Chance. Similarly on day 8, there's a 8% unlucky factor. But wait, the constraints say that there's no time limit!!

So let's do a thought experiment, I will consider 100 years, and it disappears in any year, possibility is same.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .... 100th year(1% chance of failure)

1 2 3 4 5 6 6 8 ..... 1000th(0.1% chance of failure)

And the number tends to 0

I picked 10 days to not crash the world economy.

Satan Lucy's argument shows a lack of Knowledge of probabilities. It's a poor argument, which is mathematically inaccurate

There's something very obvious which creates a major difference between a jubilee or oxford debate and a debate craft debate, and that is, time boundation. Here on debate craft one can take a lot of time, can collect more data and arguments, or even use AI. There's no burden of a real discussion. We can have these fast paced debates, where intellect and communication are the real factors very easily. We can have Voice Mode debates(with or without camera for privacy reasons) , people can fix a particular time for a debate. The Audio Recording may remain there for voting for 24 or 48 hours. Definitely Audio Recordings are quite Big in size, to manage storage issues, we may only allow a few people to use this feature. There can be a proposal for debate, which if gets enough votes(let's say 5) then it can get a fixed time window on a day to be discussed. There can be a hard limit of 2 debates in a day.

This is highly realistic, it's feasible, very efficient and very original above all. Only Discord has a feature like a voice room, which can be used as a debate room. No other online platform, or any other platform has a voice room specifically for debates.

That's not actually true, the part where you said that Hinduism can't be removed. First let's start frome here, yes, Hinduism is indeed a way to live life. A principle of set one must follow, to be called a Hindu. The Roots of Hinduism are actually unknown, till date. But what we see in Hinduism today, it is highly logical to assume that it has been a power system all along. How will one marry, how will one have kids, who will be the ruler, who will be the merchant and who will be the slave. What will be the role of a man, what will be the role of a woman. Hinduism is largely about these things, and obviously there are many many rituals. Marriage is a ritual, one holding a ceremony for his new built house is a ritual. The naming of a new born is a ritual. The Death of a person is a ritual. Hinduism, is indeed a way to live one's life. And when I say that we need to remove Hinduism, you can definitely interpret complete REMOVAL, both of the faith and the rituals(way to live) along. Maybe I failed to get to the core of the problem, maybe I assumed foreigners to know a lot about Hinduism. I will correct my mistake.

Marriage:- It involves dowry, which I have stated enough about in my arguments. 7 Circles(saat phere, the couple takes oath upon fire) The Oaths are problamatic, they give sexist duties to men and women. Both are vicrims, but the system is by default more partial with women.

Child Birth:- The Child's mother is Supposed to Drink Cow Urine. Maybe that's enough for an argument itself.

Death:- Suppose the father has a son and a daughter, the son will always give fire to the body. The Ritual will be done by the son only, even if Daughter gave her entire life to the father. And a following children requires the son's wife and children.

Enough talking about Hinduism being harsh to women, Castism is perhaps the hottest debate till date. And it's a direct concept from Hinduism.

When I said that It's not impossible to remove Hinduism, I meant that Hinduism is already set on the verge of death. Apatheism is killing it. In India both males and females are going to jobs, when they promise about roles in a marriage, they are doing it for the sake of elders who believe in this and socital acceptance. If not as much comparable to Christianity, Hinduism has preety much taken a diluted form. But poison is poison. Complete removal is the best option for poison, always.

Nobody follows Manusmriti, dowry is being boycotted, mother's are refusing to drink cow pee😅, and a lot more. So Hinduism is already set on the path to end up like west, in a few decades.

and one of my biggest mistake in this debate, I am realizing now. I was conveying the sense of 'killing Hinduism' when I should have said that "Hinduism is dying and that's a good thing" the most dangerous argument, which I have struggle tackling are 'You can reform Hinduism', I am always preety bad with explaining to people that, when you talk about reforming a religion, you are just killing the religion ans putting the blanket of reform on it. Yes it's a way to live life, and yes it has faith involved in it, and yes that's a bad thing, both the blind faith and out dated rituals. If something is a way to live one's life, it doesn't make it necessarily good. And yes, I thought writing the last paragraph in Italic would be cool

I recently created a debate on the topic "Hinduism has many problems and its removal is beneficial for society" I got an opponent who doesn't seem to make any sense at all. Because, 1. He isn't Indian, that's fine. 2. He isn't a Hindu, still fine, he could have collected some information through the internet. 3. He didn't do that too.

My problem is, why did a Guy who has no knowledge about a topic engage in a discussion regarding that topic. He wasn't aware of anything(baba culture, Misogynistic texts, even the texts). It puts the burden of proving a concept exists before proving the problem with the concept. I had to explain several times that The Godmen are Powered by the religious scriptures and the Scriptures can only be interpret by the Godmen. But he refused to believe his feelings over facts. Now you can't really expect me to explain something that fundamental by merely writing. I was seriously pissed off when he said that Atheists will hate humanity, People just need a reason to hate others and stuff. He was literally justifying burning of women. He justified forcing women to cover. I wanted to forfeit the debate but that would have been bad for my id. I know that there's a feature to pick a particular opponent and set a minimum opponent rating, but I don't think picking an opponent forcefully is a Good Choice, or even setting a minimum opponent rating there will be people who lack knowledge of the topic.

I think that there should be a system where every member has their area of expertise in a particular section. Like, in my case it can be. Theism(I am best at it), South Asian Geopolitics(I have read a book on this topic alone), Indian Law(I have knowledge of most Indian Laws), Morality(No Degree on Philosophy but ig basic maths works), and other areas I know a lot about, Chess(1500 elo), Science(Bio Upto Senior level, PCM upto senior secondary level), Knowledge of Technology(currently in a CSE program), knowledge of cryptography and cybersecurity. Anime(watched more than 40, started watching at age 11 anime wasn't even popular here in India back then.) Ag

See, if any person has to start a debate, there can be some feature which can feature my id to him, if my areas of expertise has anything matching