GajarMooli

When you debate, either you get a stupid opponent

Nobody Votes

There's someone who is actually voting

Some stupid moderator from Israeli , or whatever takes away your vote because.... because... I AM THE MODE I CAN DO THAT lololool

Seriously 3 of my votes were removed, and you know how many votes I casted ? 3 !!

Idiots I am not some belly dancer on a stage who is supposed to please your taste in votes !! I am not asking you to decide which vote is a worthy one and which isn't.

How much stupid is that, you ask for a vote and then decide if a vote is worthy or not ?

Stupid mods, your site is better off dead

First of all I am back, seems like the mods have changed the UI. It's worthy to give it a 2nd try

Now coming to the topic

Demons have a fundamental right to eat humans

I will prove that by relating it to already established points

Pain is wrong

We all know that pain is wrong

But pain is wrong for us, personally, only us, a small fraction of the universe and what's on earth.

Yet there are sadists, masochists even among humans.

And other animals do even more filthy things.

So that raises a question, is pain actually wrong or everyone who doesn't fit in our definition of pain and related terms is wrong ?

What is pain ?

The answer science gave, an evolutionary thing, which tells a certain spectrum of living organisms to feel fear, and run.

Snake causes pain, fear it, next time you see it, RUN !

You fell from 2 stairs, ouch ! You fell from 5 !! Aaaahhhh ! Don't ever go above ground level again !

Everything that revolves around life, dopamine(anime, social media, sex), sadness, happiness, nervousness. Every single feeling. Is developed. Developed as in a lab, a big lab, the universe.

And these developments order us, PROTECT LIFE !! You will die ? Have sex, here, made it interested for you.

Afterall science is done with everything, we get a very vague and unsatisfactory answer to why is life. You live, just because you live and you are ordered to live. Even if some of you are sucidal, the majority will continue to live, or atleast want to live.

We don't know, who told us this. Why are we like that. We just live like an obedient dog to the king.

If we can't know, why to live. Why to eat. Why is pain truly wrong.

Then it's the logical conclusion from human perspective that we can't know why are demons killing and eating humans. It's not wrong.

For the stationary universe, humans will to cling to life and demons' desire to end it are the same things. Both can't be explained.

If living is a fundamental right of a human, who doesn't know why to live

Killing is the fundamental right of a demon who doesn't know why to kill

My college life is tough, and it keeps on getting tougher

To maintain my sanity I use Social Media and entertainment

Youtube, Anime, Chess, Debate Craft.

Each of these platforms requires some energy from me, to be used.

Debate Craft particularly takes quite a lot of time, to check it again and again.

And then there's no activity. No votes, nobody's accepting my debates.

I did one debate, and my opponent was very stupid.

It isn't just worth the effort for me.

It's an apology statement, you can say. For Ghosting my current going on debates.

I hope this site gains more members in the future and becomes a better place

Why is nobody voting on my debate with that trans Dragon ?

How will this site remain functional if nobody's going to vote ?

I should be made necessary for people to make atleast one vote a week.

There's something very obvious which creates a major difference between a jubilee or oxford debate and a debate craft debate, and that is, time boundation. Here on debate craft one can take a lot of time, can collect more data and arguments, or even use AI. There's no burden of a real discussion. We can have these fast paced debates, where intellect and communication are the real factors very easily. We can have Voice Mode debates(with or without camera for privacy reasons) , people can fix a particular time for a debate. The Audio Recording may remain there for voting for 24 or 48 hours. Definitely Audio Recordings are quite Big in size, to manage storage issues, we may only allow a few people to use this feature. There can be a proposal for debate, which if gets enough votes(let's say 5) then it can get a fixed time window on a day to be discussed. There can be a hard limit of 2 debates in a day.

This is highly realistic, it's feasible, very efficient and very original above all. Only Discord has a feature like a voice room, which can be used as a debate room. No other online platform, or any other platform has a voice room specifically for debates.

I recently created a debate on the topic "Hinduism has many problems and its removal is beneficial for society" I got an opponent who doesn't seem to make any sense at all. Because, 1. He isn't Indian, that's fine. 2. He isn't a Hindu, still fine, he could have collected some information through the internet. 3. He didn't do that too.

My problem is, why did a Guy who has no knowledge about a topic engage in a discussion regarding that topic. He wasn't aware of anything(baba culture, Misogynistic texts, even the texts). It puts the burden of proving a concept exists before proving the problem with the concept. I had to explain several times that The Godmen are Powered by the religious scriptures and the Scriptures can only be interpret by the Godmen. But he refused to believe his feelings over facts. Now you can't really expect me to explain something that fundamental by merely writing. I was seriously pissed off when he said that Atheists will hate humanity, People just need a reason to hate others and stuff. He was literally justifying burning of women. He justified forcing women to cover. I wanted to forfeit the debate but that would have been bad for my id. I know that there's a feature to pick a particular opponent and set a minimum opponent rating, but I don't think picking an opponent forcefully is a Good Choice, or even setting a minimum opponent rating there will be people who lack knowledge of the topic.

I think that there should be a system where every member has their area of expertise in a particular section. Like, in my case it can be. Theism(I am best at it), South Asian Geopolitics(I have read a book on this topic alone), Indian Law(I have knowledge of most Indian Laws), Morality(No Degree on Philosophy but ig basic maths works), and other areas I know a lot about, Chess(1500 elo), Science(Bio Upto Senior level, PCM upto senior secondary level), Knowledge of Technology(currently in a CSE program), knowledge of cryptography and cybersecurity. Anime(watched more than 40, started watching at age 11 anime wasn't even popular here in India back then.) Ag

See, if any person has to start a debate, there can be some feature which can feature my id to him, if my areas of expertise has anything matching