GreatfulGoy's avatar

GreatfulGoy

Member since

GreatfulGoy

If correct, you need an original. And that original needs to have let us know its identity at some point unless it is a deceptive deity.

GreatfulGoy

Ofc it won't. It would be the only of its own kind, barely anything common about it with us unless it(or he) was born of a womb as a human and later resurrected and showed himself transfigurated even, to 3 men at least.

GreatfulGoy

Speaking from pragmatic viewpoint I do not remotely see how monogamy can counterbalance war losses in any way that makes men more dispensable than women to thed egree you.implied based on repopulation potential.


Only bigamy would begin to make your point make sense.


In my honest opinion idk what Yeshua meant when he set it as a hard absolute rule. It does seem to guarantee Christian depopulation post war that for instance Islamic approach never experiences post war otber than due to starvation or further in-fighting.

GreatfulGoy

I have some Puritan overlap but I definitely see 0 room for a Catholic to joke about males being raped.


Puritans in modern times are actually more likely to make such vile jokes as I notice their morals are not nearly as rigid as they pretend they are.

GreatfulGoy
You just need one man for each woman of childbearing age. They're produced at a much higher rate than that.

This works only in non Christian societies.


For Christian societies it will be Hellboundedness for any engaging in this... I dont know why but God ruled it so. 1 man for 1 woman or we go to Hell. No option 3. Clearly stated by none other than Lord Yeshua himself.

GreatfulGoy

The left wing solution to this is to control many things to soften the blow/impact of it on the poor and stablise inflation by forced price-caps or subsidising things so it's cheaper for low in come people etc.


The right wing solution is at its extreme (pure free market) to assume things 'even out over time' and motivte people to work hard to earn stuff.


Left wing are smarter at first, genuinely, and you will find that more developed nations lean left on how they handle inflation usually. Right wing approach doesn't work short-term but longer term it ends up needed, hence why socialism and communism tend to fail when properly done each and every time.

GreatfulGoy

Idk the specifics of the court mechanics and all that.


I know that blind birthright citizenship is a bit stupid, personally. You need at least 1 additional condition to have the baby be a citizen. For instance, having at least 1 parent who's a long-term resident of the US and has paid taxes would make sense. Alternatively, having blood of a US citizen even if they currently don't reside long-term in US could be a justification.


Either way, to unconditionally give birthright citizenship doesn't make much sense to me. It basically allows enemies to pop over to US, have a baby and then their offspring are full citizens from birth based on no other factor than that. From that point, you've basically only screened the parents enough that you know they aren't a known enemy of US. However, here's where it gets really problematic.


So, let's say you had a known foreign criminal woman and her forgeign husband even more so, they're in US. They are under arrest or detained and have a baby. That baby is now a full citizen of US despite the parents being known criminals, having no loyalty to US at all nor residing there anything close to long-term.


Birthright Citizenship as a flat concept is flawed. It needs to be conditional. What's really interesting is nearly the whole world outside of the Americas (meaning outside North and South America both) don't have birthright citizenship how they do.


Online sources seem ignorant of a few exceptions in Africa as well as Pakistan which uniquely, for Asia, offers unconditional Birthright Citizenship (but it has 1 condition, the father can't be a known enemy of Pakistan, that's the only real condition it has).


The approach of 'born here, okay, you are a citizen' is overall specific to the Americas. Part of why it may be a trait inherent to the Americas is they're founded on invaders feeling indigenous to the land. However, this doesn't explain why Australasia doesn't have this policy.

GreatfulGoy

They are from East India Company.

Psychopathic colonist mentality.


And yes, there is different types of colonist mentality. The EIC was among the worst ever colonialism to.come out of Britain.

GreatfulGoy
like bringing world peace, rebuilding the Temple, gathering Jews to Israel

The Christian nations have helped approach world peace more than any prior civilisation, religion or appriach ever did.


Israel as a nation state does exist and has Jews now and this was done thanks to Christian nations fighting for it. However, it is naive and simple-minded to think Israel meant what that is.


Israel originally meant the grandson of Abraham named Jacob. The new Israeli figure is Yesbua, Jesus. It is in Christ we all join the Biblical Israel.


Since Israel exists as a nationstate and Jews are moving to it, you are wrong that even superficially there are 0 clues that Yeshua is succeeding. On 2nd coming all will be achieved.

GreatfulGoy

The 1 true God has the name.


Lord YHWH.


He is of 3 persons; Father, Son and Holy Spirit.


These are to be worshipped as follows:


You worship the Son mainly in your mind. He is the way, the truth and the life.


Through him, via his ways and methods you then frame the Fathers Old Testament ways. And both together (Orthodox disagree) released the Holy Spirit as their combined will and guidance mechanism in us.


HS is his own person but is also a quieter one, he interacts within you not 'back at you' as much


You do it. You repent. You grow.


Or...


You perish and do so in horrifyingly agonising fire, brimstone and such. These are the facts the Lord revealed to us.

GreatfulGoy

The fact a guy like you was licensed and continually gave therapy to mentally fragile children is INSANElY bad screening.


I didnt say Im better at it. I said no way you are good for it.