GreatfulGoy

Antinatalism is a mental poison.

Best Muslim post 2025

I do hate Nazism.

Thanks. I knew that.

My username has layers to what it means.

I am not gonna lay it all out.

There are more layers than you first assume. Some are taboo.

I just notice, accept and move on.

They see us as they see us. Be Goy. Be unaplogetically proud of it. Let them and their Talmud say what they say.

Explain yours

Given how genuinely toxic and volatile Ive seen you be esp on DART I am shocked you kept such a job. Nazi images on the regular too.

Insane.

barring Luke and Yeshua himself

Meant the 72 and Yeshua himself, barring Luke

Jewishness is actually ethnic 1st religious only 2nd.

You cannot be Jewish and defend Christianity.

You literally can. All the apostles, extended 72 barring Luke and Yeshua himself were Jews. 🤣

Cringe AI.

I get it now.

The 12-27 is fake.

You were born in the year 1227 and are a legitimate vampire.

Was he an atheist pretending to be a Catholic or an open atheist? I am confused.

Thanks for your ditzy AI response

Thanks for proving me right.

Latinos are usually Catholic btw.

DM me if youre open to deconvert from LDS to Catholicism.

I will evangelise privately to you.

Secularisation is (and obviously also was) the biggest singular catalyst for the depopulation of whites other than the wars they fought.

Yet, there is no legal way for Europeans to push against secularisation, nor most of other nations like America etc as it's deeply ingraind in the national constitution and/or core values to be secularised (freedom of religion coming above morality of the Christian faith).

This will perpetually continue until the nations firmly unite Church and State.

if you made rich manors share their land and resources, we are so far from overpopulation it's insane.

left wing pushes the lie, right wing greedy pigs enjoy the lie. neither wing is helping properly.

yeah whites are severely depopulating and they pretend it's overpopulation.

However, it's actually left wing policies eventually needed to stop greedy pigs taking up all the massive land and building space the others can fill and resources they can use.

Left wing deal with helping the population but push to depopulate the natives. Right wing deal with defending the natives but don't help allocate space and resources to the poor that have populated.

I have observed supernatural forces influencing my life/surroundings.

The Nazis were heavily inspried by him.

Machiavelli, like Nietzche, was a self-identfied loser in life that felt he knew why he'd lost and forned entire theories about it.

You will notice that neither Nietzche's stuff not Machavelli's tend to work as well as they sound at first glance.

Jesus says it is a sin to love money at all.

You are slowly realising it...

Everyone is a sinner but not all sins are equal.

Christianity is the true religion.

Inheriting can mean you were a good son/grandson etc.

If you were humble and generous youd give too much away to stay wealthy.

It means more 2 than 1.

Many twist it to mean 1. It means 2.

Humility Isn't About Poverty, It's About Character Being humble doesn't mean you should be poor. You can be humble and wealthy

I actually am growing to believe this is impossible. I am that extreme that I think there is actually virtue in staying relatively poor (but not properly poor, just on the poorer side of whatever 'middle' is in your relative town/city).

This is so extreme an idea that I hold that I think if someone gets too much inheritance they definitely should sacrifice it even if it makes their children have to live poorer (but again poor not as in starving or totally rags for clothes, poor as in poorer side of medium as the goal but less is acceptable as long as it isn't poverty).

If you think hard about what it is to be wealthy, no matter how 'humble' you believe you are and try to think like you can't possibly be humble if you think you deserve more net wealth by far, than most. It's fundamentally impossible to be wealthy to a definite 'he/she is rich' degree and believe you don't deserve it at the same time and act on that belief.

I am aware my idea isn't practical, in this day and age what exactly can a son or daughter of someone as right and known as Bill Gates do? If he/she lives poor, then he/she likely gets taken for ransom soon by criminals in the area. Furthermore, he/she will be ridiculed for it and stick out like a sore thumb even in church if recognised, unless in church at their affluent area.

I think it's very, very difficult to be a good Christian if you're born into wealth and/or fame. It's just so incredibly difficult because the entirety of your life circumstances gravitate you towards arrogance and the capacity to regulary sin even as severe as mortal sin and in a secular sense get away with them.

The aim is also ridiculous-seeming. How would you operate so you end up working class or slightly above it, if born affluent? It's very difficult. You also need to justify to your spouse and children why you ditched all that wealth to charity etc rather than kept it when getting inheritance or chances at higher wealth assisted by your parents/guardians.

All of this leads to that you must first avoid any form of golddigger partner. A man can be a gold-digger even that he himself is greed-driven would mean he's a variant of self-run gold digger (he bases life decisions on wealth, he's the breadwinning side of gold digger relationship).

It's all toxic. You need to make very sure you chose the right partner.

Ok, so if my eye takes me to hell, should I cut it out or not?

Almost always not.

the context was clearly talking about living people, and mainly people who try to judge others by bringing up their faults and punishing them for their faults. these words clearly dont refer to any dead people.

that is pretty much impossible to be true. For instance, even though he was God it's very obvious Jesus was playing the role of solely being human, while here. He referred to God as a superior and not himself at times. This also means when he harshly judged people calling them vipers etc, that's what he was fine with Christians doing to be Christlike. When he furthermore supported the death penalty and never once faulted the Romans for being ruthless with criminals (and btw the 'don't throw the first stone' passage was added in long after he died) he merely suggested Christians hesitate more before being harsh, not that they never be it. If you believe he genuinely wanted nobody to judge evil happening around the and those doing it at all, then good poeple could never be judge either. Very ridiculous suggestion, he didn't mean it that literally. By this logic, you couldn't say 'good boy' to a son of yours even as that's judging him.

Do not judge

This meant don't judge who is 100% in Hell or not (maybe barring extremely airtight cases like Stalin and Hitler but whatever). You are meant to assume you don't know who ends up in Heaven or Hell while they're still alive. That's the actual context and what he was commanding. He probably also meant for the dead but definitely meant it more towards the still-alive. I don't think he included extremely obviously evil people though but I honestly don't want to be too heretical here so I'll leave it at that.

I will just say that it's strange that we have Saints who we say are definitely in Heaven yet we're also not meant to judge as if we know that... Blatant contradiction but that's life.