Yoy can get genuinely dependent on alcohol.
Yoy can get genuinely dependent on alcohol.
No. This is far beyind that. Almostnall other languages use equivalents of happy and joyful with 0 alcoholism and degeneracy encouraged.
An exception isostScnadinavian languages. They use something more akin to merry/festive than happy. It is a word in between joyful and festive and implies partying hard and drinking.
Minecraft is not inherently pay-to-play; you buy the game once to own it
That is literally a form of pay-to-play, it's just the most unconditional form of it as opposed to the recurring subscription style.
btw if you're not too paranoid about Google, Google Docs is the best solution. You can even stick to 1 doc for multiple debates, delete and replace the text and all.
It autosaves every 2 seconds or so.
The issue is this site doesn't paste well from the Docs, it messed up some formatting, will blank out images and quotes have to be entirely manually done.
It's still the best free option if you don't have Word or something.
'Happy Christmas' is better.
Merry Christmas indeed implies filthy animals, drunk, fornicating, all of it. It's a toxic term that gained momentum in the anglosphere wrongly.
I will not spend time on this on a holy day like Christmas Eve nor on Christmas Day.
I will say you are not correct due to the false dichotomy you created, however there is truth behind the lion-chaser concept you explained.
I will explain more later but leave you with one hierarchy I found is true for most women (again, you make the error of generalising all women):
I won't justify it. I won't put more effort in until after Christmas day is fully over for the European timezones. Thanks.
For some women 4 can surpass 3.
Let's agree that I upset you by what I said. I can be sorry for that outcome, not the other stuff and what I did was fine from Thoth's perspective I am presuming.
You got agitated, believed you had to right a wrong. You white-knighted and I have actually been like you there in other scenarios both online and irl where both people tell me to shut up and back off so I understand why you did it.
Therefore, the 'wrong' is that my behaviour upset others. However, at this point I must consider if it would even have been possible to deliver the same message in a less distressing way for those others. I don't know.
Happy Christmas.
2 Timothy 2:23-26: Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels... the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful.
1 Corinthians 4:13: When we are slandered, we answer gently. We have become the scum of the earth, the garbage of the world—right up to this moment.
Titus 3:9: But avoid foolish debates, genealogies, quarrels, and disputes about the law, because they are unprofitable and worthless.
Sikhs do their own thing, I am not going to badmouth their little ethnoreligion. In many ways they're Noahides to Judaism without realising they are (search what a Noahide has to adhere to).
I really don't care about challenging Sikhism. They do their thing and keep it chill. Obviously, it's less chill if you're their family member and an apostate but nowhere near what Muslims do and in terms of disowning apostates (Islam may even 'honour kill' them or some sick stuff), religions like Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism more likely to do it than Sikhs, by far.
The main thing I don't get their full logic on the no hair cutting (even women are commanded to be hairy, they cover it up in clothing consistently so most non Sikhs don't notice unless the woman has moustache hair.
It isn't the same as saying 'don't clean shave', they basically mandate alack of grooming yet blatantly regularly groom their beards (just not shave it off) It even looks like they often trim it as it grows to maintain slick shaping.
Sikhism is a Punjabi ethnoreligion (Jews oftentimes wrongly state they're the only one, there are multiple ethnoreligions on Earth) what makes Jews unique is they use the same word for the ethnic member and religious adherent.
If you're not Punjabi and want to be Sikh, be sure you suit never shaving or barely any trimming ever. Yes, even pubic hair of any kind.
Yes. even back there.
I have highest IQ in the world
No, you do not.
It is literally a rule, I thought.
Does it break mafia rules to past mafia chats into threads here while a game is still active? Rex did so.
you are on the list for your nazi imagery at the very least
I think you confused Rex with RemyBrown but I thumbs-upped your post anyway.
I made the right call, even told him where to find topics and already had provided a link for it earlier in the thread. He quit, realising I was correct and doubled down on it when you tried to white-knight him. You lost on every front here. You have not changed to any significant degree from the guy who did the things I said you did in my eyes but I am not the judge, God is.
I see you largely similar to how I saw you before. It's me who changed.
So you are a minority even in the autistic community?
I wish he was but I have come to learn that I actually am an 'autist' that sides with those that generally avoid the autistic themselves.
Enough autistic people I have grown knowing irl proved to me that we actually are rarely the 'good guy/girl victim' we are portrayed to be (and I can tell they're autistic as I'm one of them, I pick up on it quite fast some explicitly I knew had the diagnosis, others I could just tell). Often, we are self-centred, insensitive and justify our tantrums by a disorder we actually can gradually lessen the symptoms of but actively choose not to.
We can never be non-autistic or non-prone to the additional stress, insensitive remarks we make etc but we can actively tone it down that is a choice. It takes learning coping mechanisms, avoiding triggers, learning to breathe deep when triggered and to definitely aim to at worst harm objects rather than humans with our frustration.
I have seen enough 'autists' in my life as an autist to realise that I do not recommend these 'autistic communities' that most do. To be stuck exclusively with other autistic people in a community (rather than just a family) would gradually drive one to become worse and worse socially and emotionally and feel one is entitled to stay that way.
I actively push myself to interact with non-autists both online and offline as they help regulate my understanding of what is currently politically correct, socially acceptable, how to act or not act etc.
So says a boy of around 30 who sponges of his parents for a living.
That isn't the key thing, in my eyes.
It's that he's proud of it and brags about his willingness to keep it that way!
There is a difference between being ashamed about that situation and taking steps gradually to get employed and out of it, changing your life bit by bit vs wilfully staying that way.
I think any priest who touches a boy in any way should no longer be a priest.
Honestly, this is correct. Them not defrocking the Priests was a major managerial error but the main reason it's hard to replace Catholic Clergy is that it takes multiple years of studying, is only open to males and requires vow of lifelong celibacy (you are meant to stay celibate even if defrocked because your vow is to God regardless of if the Pope and Bishops demote you).
This dissuades quite a few men to become Catholic Clergy.
Another significant issue is that Priests have a lot of dirt on their parishioners. The confessional booth is considered more sacred and secure than even a lawyer's confidentiality agreement. If the Priest gets instantly defrocked, they could tear people's lives apart, blackmail them and ruin the entire sanctity of the Confessional booth. By keeping them 'frocked' you keep them having something secular (reputation and position of power) to lose, so as not to permanently tarnish the sacred sanctity of the Sacrament of Reconciliation (AKA Confession).
That all said, the right move morally is to defrock them, you are right. Even if that leaves people with no Priest near them... it's an unfortunate sacrifice and fast-tracking a Deacon who isn't married to promotion or pulling back the celibacy rule (if married prior to becoming a Priest) may need to come into play. The earliest Popes were not celibate, this rule got introduced several Popes in.
If stupid person knew why he is stupid, he wouldnt be stupid.
It actually takes high intelligence to be able to recognize stupidity.
Stupid people think that stupid is smart. they are stupid because they fail to recognize what stupid even is.
With age of consent somewhat, yes.
You pasted some mafia comment by someone else btw.
You really are incapable of addressing arguments logically. You lash out, insult, degrade, abuse and all the while throwing that tantrum claim the other person is throwing it.
If you want a logical, mature discussion about MAGA and American white ethnonationalism, I am willing to have it. If not, at least do not pretend you are capable of it and seeking it.
The intellectual mind is much more from and encouraged by God. Instinct is from God but warped by Satan Satan (not entirely at all, you need them and emotions help lead to God).
Satan has corrupted us. We are in a very bad state.
The urge to beat someone up that has wronged you or someone you know is natural and innate also, for males especially.
Natural =/= Good.
It is better for someone's wellbeing to quit this stuff when going through hard times.
You are one of the least aprotsmanlike competitors of all.fime.both in voting, using alt accounts, semantic abuseand direct abuse verbally of opponents.
You are the LAST person who gets to lecture me on that.
I notice you.ignored my other post.
In UK, you are allowed to criticise the King legally but cannot deeply ridicule him as much. Denmark actually has much harsher laws about criticising royalty.
The law I am referring to earlier. isn't specific to UK it is worldwide law regarding age of consent discussions, at least for Europe.
This site will get sued big time later or.banned in all non US nations and US states worth their salt in morality, at leasst formthose under 18.
Time will tell.
If I was law enforcement this would already be under investigation but I am not and its why I can even dare debate on it. Yoy are entertaining illegal chats.
He shoukd not be allowed to post it, idc if I see it. It should be banned to post. Anyone can ses it by visiting this website and tapping a button.
Underreporting definitely is a factor among prots and orthos
How much do you know about the Christ Messiah prophecies of Book of Isaiah (this is Judaism not Christianity originally)?