Sad your opponent forfeited. If you want to do a debate on this topic I'd be happy to do so.
@Fauxlaw thought you’d enjoy this debate especially the discussion on modal logic
Round 1 sources
Sources
1. https://www.humanrightscareers.com/issues/definitions-what-is-human-dignity/
2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260493897_The_challenges_of_fighting_sex_trafficking_in_the_legalized_prostitution_market_of_the_Netherlands
3 https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/if-nevadans-are-serious-about-ending-sex-trafficking-they-must-abolish-legal-prostitution?utm_source=chatgpt.com
4. https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/if-nevadans-are-serious-about-ending-sex-trafficking-they-must-abolish-legal-prostitution?utm_source=chatgpt.com
5. https://iusw.org/10-causes-of-prostitution/
6. https://www.awakenjustice.org/is-prostitution-a-choice
7. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/jessa-dillow-crisp-i-remember-the-smells-the-sight/
8. https://legislature.maine.gov/testimony/resources/JUD20230411Demos133256328644114591.pdf
Yeah 30,000 is way too many.
<p>>Reported Vote: RationalTheist // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: other</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Test</p>
<p>---RationalTheist's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>test</p>
Oh baby
OMG I am dying at your arguments. Leg up on the economy. OMG I am literally laughing out loud.
LOL
No. I am actually very pro choice.
ROFL!!
<p>>Reported Vote: RationalTheist // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: other</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Mod power test </p>
<p>---RationalTheist's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>Test vote </p>
<p>>Reported Vote: FLRW // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Needs more analysis. </p>
<p>---FLRW's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>RemyBrown provides an adequate argument that a fetus is not a child.</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: FLRW // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Needs more analysis. </p>
<p>---FLRW's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>RemyBrown provides an adequate argument that a fetus is not a child.</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: FLRW // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p></p>
<p>---FLRW's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>RemyBrown provides an adequate argument that a fetus is not a child.</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: FLRW // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p></p>
<p>---FLRW's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>RemyBrown provides an adequate argument that a fetus is not a child.</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: RationalTheist // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: other</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Test</p>
<p>---RationalTheist's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>Testing something</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: BozoTheClown // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: other</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Test </p>
<p>---BozoTheClown's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>test</p>
That's the spirit! To be honest I really enjoy playing devil's advocate. Part of the fun of LD debates is getting assigned a random side and forced to argue that side even if you disagree with it.
Also you are arguing for the resolution (that prostitution should be legalized). I am negating. I waive the first round and the first round is your opening statements.
I'm looking forward to this debate! I'm actually surprised you'd be Pro on this subject. Warning: There is no way to preview arguments. As soon as you hit submit they will be submitted. This is something we are working on.
