thank you!!!
Thank you!! I hope this is a great debate.
I’m quite busy over the next two days so it may be a bit before I can put my opening arguments up.
I’ll accept the debate. We can discuss this in the debate or in private. Truthfully the answer is no because I believe Christianity to be diametrically opposed to Torah.
I’m interested but would like note than 2 days to argue
<p>>Reported Vote: NordMan009 // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: too-vague</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Voter does not sufficiently explain his vote. Voter needs to analyze pro’s arguments and explain **how and why** con failed to rebut them. </p>
<p>--- NordMan009's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>Ultracrepidarian gave step by step arguments in defense but Leaning failed to properly address them.</p>
thanks for the vote
That's a debate in and of itself. Jewish tradition does not believe that God's emotions, like anger or hatred, are to be taken literally. God does not experience emotions like humans do. There is a principle that the Torah speaks the language of man.
This is similar to how we understand verses like G-d walked, went. down, stretched his arm, etc. God obviously does not have literal body parts as He is not corporeal.
<p>>Reported Vote: fauxlaw // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Both debaters argued in round 1 and both forfeited round 2. Because both sides forfeited equal amounts of rounds and argued in equal amounts of rounds one is not able to award a point because the other side forfeited without analyzing arguments presented. </p>
<p>---fauxlaw's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>Pro wins debate by opponent forfeit of 2/3 of the debate rounds.</p>
Go to your profile, click on badges, and then go to the voting badge. Read through our standards and take the quiz. This will tell you everything we are looking for when we moderate votes.
Go to your profile, click on badges, and then go to the voting badge. Read through our standards and take the quiz. This will tell you everything we are looking for when we moderate votes.
<p>>Reported Vote: pedro7ag // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: con</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p></p>
<p>---pedro7ag's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: con</p>
<p>I think contender is the obviously winner not just for his words but also for just simple moral as he said GUNS ARE ADICTIVE AS ALCHOOL guns have brough destruction through years and it is not a RIGHT to give it to anyone who wants to have duels...</p>
Please do!
Thank you for the vote
reminder. 2 days left.
I’d be down
Thanks for the vote. I definitely regret not choosing Cartman, the literal GOAT of TV characters
Thank you for the vote!
thanks for the report. vote removed
<p>>Reported Vote: Panda // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: too-vague</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>the voter failed to properly analyze the debate</p>
<p>---Panda's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>Umm, kind of obvious here</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: Panda // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>the voter failed to properly analyze the debate</p>
<p>---Panda's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: pro</p>
<p>Con assumed a lot and also pro used better sources.</p>
<p>>Reported Vote: Rohith // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: fails-to-analyze</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Tied votes need to be explained. This vote fails to properly analyze the arguments made in this debate. </p>
<p>---Rohith's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p> I like this debate.</p>
I removed your vote
<p>>Reported Vote: Death23 // Mod action: Removed</p>
<p>>Voting Policy: info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy</p>
<p>>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>>Reason for Decision: other</p>
<p>>Reason for Mod Action:</p>
<p>Removed per request of voter </p>
<p>---Death23's former vote---</p>
<p>Voted for: tie</p>
<p>eligibility test vote so that i dont risk wasting my time writing up a vote only to have it not work</p>
