Finished
vs
This House believes that geoengineering is an unacceptable risk.
This debate requires a mutual acceptance that climate change is a thing that is happening, with the debate itself stemming from whether geoengineering is an appropriate way to tackle it given the risks. Geoengineering includes a set of technologies that have much wider reaching effects, for better or worse, and functions more as an intervention rather than a preventative measure as other methods do. Is the risk of investing time and resources into it, as well as the broader impacts of testing it, worth it for the potential benefits?
