Someone joking about genociding one race is more crazy to stupid people than someone joking about genociding them all.
Someone joking about genociding one race is more crazy to stupid people than someone joking about genociding them all.
-> If other people have wrong beliefs or unproductive habits, and you mirror your beliefs or habits in response, you're not punishing them, you're punishing yourself.
I mirror them to an extent. I would say the Jews need to do better, but I would ALWAYS choose the strange Jew in the woods over the polar bear. THAT is the ethical difference between me and women.
->The idea that Jews are 'from' Poland is an insidious abtisemitic trope. Jews are from the Levant, and enjoy a much more balmy climate.
I actually thought many of the Jews were from Poland. I wasn't trying to say, "Gas the Jews". They got to be from somewhere. But plenty of jews live in cold climates; many live in NYC.
Women can say, "Men should do better" and nobody cares. How dare I make a similar comment on a religious group. Female privilege (from the people who claim that women are oppressed). That's the left's way of RageBaiting; once I realized that (and they will double RageBait while denying that it's Rage Bait), I've learned that RageBait is ethically acceptable if it's accurate. But how do you determine what's accurate? Honestly, in this society, might makes right (and it sucks). But that's life.
I appreciate you.
How do I vote?
This is what someone said. 100% of humans should die. Zero backlash.
Imagine someone said this about only a certain race (lets say this race makes up 25% of the population). She is a hypocrite because she is a human.
Wanting 25% of the population dead is not as bad as wanting 100% of the population dead. But society treats it worse.
That is a problem.
-> For the non rage bait posts.
Do those even exist anymore if they're political? Last one I saw besides me was made 23 days ago.
->Or they don't want to waste time debating someone they think holds an extreme racist opinion.
My profile says I'm moderate. An extreme opinion is, "Kill all Jews!". Telling someone to do better isn't advocating for their execution.
->The trial will likely reinforce free speech more than anything.
You're probably right, but I've noticed that because solidarity is dead in America, the people who hate me have more energy than those who want me to have free speech.
->I support the trial cause it's better to be transparent about what mods are discussing.
I could see that. But I really want to win.
->when you are around normal people
Normal people are stupid; I prefer just to mask when I'm around them.
A creepy man is any straight man who's not rich enough by the standards of the woman he wants. Because I don't want to date, I can't be a creep.
->if you want to find a woman that would rather be with you than a bear
I don't want the impossible; their brains are to run by emotion and there are billions of them. Emotional thinking = stupid thinking.
->completely detached from reality
That's the new feminist insult, "detached from reality".
->try "acting" normal, see if you can "fit in"
Acting normal means wasting my money on women. I refuse to act normal; as normal=average, and your average person is an idiot.
Logic is creepy. It's better to be creepy than emotional/stupid.
->People tend to assume bad faith online and your post will just reinforce that for them.
Then why do they come here?
->Can't really rely on other people to have all the patience and do the work to figure out what you really mean.
Are people really that sensitive?
If millions of people want to earn their voting rights, then it forces streamlining, after which immigration tests become easier for future immigrants.
And I would expect Jews to ask the same questions that you were willing too. I mean, when your community is impacted, you would want to improve it the most to get along with people?
->And people who would be sucked into rage bait may spend their time elsewhere doing something productive instead.
People come on here during their free time; you don't do productive things during your break.
->As I said, my only concern is corruption. Someone will need to decide on the questions
The same immigration questions that every immigrant has to take to become a US citizen with votting rights.
The thing is, when I would make this, I would expect Jewish people to be angry initially, but then they read it and they think, "Oh; he has a point." There are women who say that, "boys are always horny". That's RageBait. I heard that, and rather than get them reported, I tried to not be horny (and if I thought horniness was good, then I would either defend it or admit addiction). There was a woman I heard that was cooking and she said, "And THIS is why you can't trust men to do the shopping". I've shopped a lot before as a dude, and she's right. Her takes on Man vs Bear are INSANE, but on the, "Men can't shop well", she's right.
My boring title will probably attract small amounts of conversation compared to my clickbait titles. There is a reason why people became more political after Trump (and why once Trump is gone, people will stop caring). Shock statements get people interested. Nobody cared about immigration in 2010.
I'd make the exam required to vote, but passing the exam isn't required as not passing the exam just means you can't vote; you won't get put in prison. This means people who genuinely are apolitical don't take the exam and they don't vote once every 1160 days. They can watch TV for all I care.
People who are political on one issue are often political on dozens. How do you pick the favorite issue?
Apparently, somebody wants to get me banned.
Out of his evidence, the prosecutor presents:
Where the prosecution and I have some common ground is I'm identitarian to a large extent (as we all are). I'll make my case without mentioning Women, Blacks, Jews, or any group like that.
In the US, it is illegal to drink alcohol if you're under 21. That's ageism; that's identitarian. The law discriminates against those who have being under 21 as part of their identity. Everyone agrees. I'm identitarian; so is everybody. Some are more identitarian than others. Race is largely based on geogorphy. The same is true for types of states (blue state, battleground state, red state). If you say, "Winning CA as a democrat is easy; winning TX as a democrat is hard", then that's an identitarian statement; the state is the identity. There was a time when I rejected identitarian mentality, then I watched these videos and it changed things:
These are very frequently viewed videos. I didn't agree with everything in the videos, but the parts I disagreed with I just ignored and continued to watch. Virtually zero comments were mocking the creator or any of the people involved with the video. And although I'm own my bias, I don't think this trial should have ever existed and I'm surprised it ever occurred to begin with.
I mean this in a genuine way, if my opinions are banworthy, then I fail to see how one can be genuinely socially conservative and be permitted to be on this site.
DebateCraft says I'm pretty moderately on the right. Creative; original; but moderate nonetheless.
->Why not just say "anyone who chooses the bear shouldn't be allowed to vote"?
Too specific of a case. Choosing the bear over a leopard is fine. Choosing a tree over a strange man is fine. But preferring suicide to talking to a strange man is absolute lunacy and ppl with those views shouldn't be voting. Let them have their free speech; children have free speech; that doesn't mean you trust children with voting for the most powerful person in the world.
->You might see it as fraternizing with the enemy, figures, but normal people just call it "being married".
Except it's obvious that your wife controls your brain more than you control your brain.
->but love and physical intimacy with a woman is wonderful
So you're addicted to sex then.
->I really appreciate that women would rather be alone with me than a bear.
Only a very small % of women in the world would choose you over the bear. Your wife obviously would. Maybe a few hundred other women. But billions of women who don't know who you are choose the bear over YOU (the feminist dude). Left wing men are still strange men. Do you think outside the people you know?
->Should women who don't choose the bear be allowed to vote?
If they're genuine, then fine. I've just learned that women's verbal opinions are way too often to protect her image. So if a woman chooses the man, then I try and figure out if she's being honest and if she chooses the bear, then I try and keep my distance from the person. I wish no physically bad things to occur to her, but I don't want her in my presence. I don't need a woman's consent to be by myself.
You should be legally required to pass the citizenship test to vote that immigrants have to go through to get to vote. Don't let people vote who don't care enough to pass the test on their own as an adult.
->People are commonly poor estimators of the deadliness of certain animals.
The women that prefer the black bear over a strange man because they think black bears are harmless; they still know the polar bear would kill you.
They choose the polar bear over the strange man. Think about that.
-> If you're going by intelligence why not just measure IQ or give a test?
I'd be fine with requiring the citizenship test to vote. But I know the democrats won't and I know white women who choose the bear won't study for that. I think my next post will be, "require the citizenship test to vote". But boring titles like that don't get eyeballs on them, so people would generally shrug it off. If shrugging off is agreeing, then that would be decent. I've looked at the questions, I'd know I'd be able to pass. Hopefully, if the GOP wins in the midterms, then THAT becomes the standard; you can't vote without passing the test.
->For the purpose of being inflammatory or because you think it's an effective way of communicating your ideas?
I think it's an effective way of communicating my ideas. If I wanted to be inflammatory, then I'd be wanting the Jews murdered. But clickbait is effective.
-> If you'd made a post with stats about Jewish influence in media, noted
I could bring up the stats if needed.
Out of the following companies:
Anyone who says, "Not meaningfully classifiable" I interpret as Jewish due to the stereotype. I knew Fox was managed by a Christian.
Saying, "Jews do a majority of raping kids" is inflammatory, I wouldn't say that. In reality, the vast majority of every ethnicity and gender doesn't rape kids. But saying, "All of these media companies are run by Jews except for Fox News" when I think the unknowns are closet Jews because of the stereotype seems to be factual.
-> rather than just saying "Jews need to do better,"
Women can say, "Men need to do better" for stuff that's not criminal (like not showering). Blacks can say, "Whites need to do better". Saying a group needs to do better is NOT what made Hitler horrible.
What made Hitler bad was NOT saying mean words about Jews, it was getting Jews (and other people) murdered. Mean words lead to murder virtually none of the time. Think of all of the times when you said mean words about people. How many of them did you murder? None.
I reject political, religious, and ethnic violence, but I 100% endorse political, religious, and ethnic criticism. I'll criticize my own party, religion, and ethnicity if I can think of an example.
->Right now there's a trial going on and you're in danger of being banned because a lot of people are taking your inflammatory posts at face value.
I actually was unaware. Profile says I'm pretty moderate and answered a lot of questions. But I've noticed on this site, exclude my forum posts, nobody's created one for over 23 days. I might jinx it, but it seems that the politics forum might be dead without the jinx I did. If so, then the main things on here are Mafia and religion.
Taking the voting rights is based on the hypothetical where men learned just how stupid women actually are. Hypotheticals are supposed to reflect reality.
America is racially mixed up enough to where a Holocaust won't realistically occur.
That's expected, but it's a nothing burger really. Just 2 buildings.
And I'm fine with that as the ppl most racist to dark brown people are dark brown ppl of other ethnicities. It's why Europe has the EU and Africa has wars.
India wasn't mentioned.
They get put on the map if/when they rejoin.
A terrorist is what the government calls you so they can kill you. No BoP required.
I'm unsurprised, but I'm not a rapist, so I don't really care. When they can't arrest 97% of the guilty rapists, I know I'm fine (I'm a virgin).