->So, are you saying that if a woman chooses a bear over RemyBrown because he is a creepy incel, that means he is a creepy incel?
It means the woman is an idiot who is anti male sexist. You have a party to stick too and don't have the balls to admit to it.
I got a party to stick too, but I'll OWN that shit. You can't say the same thing because you're a coward.
->You have to excuse him. He does not have any books on his bookshelf on pictures of himself.
Meaningless and inaccurate woman insult right here to feel good in her eyes.
You deserve to feel horrible.
-> In fact, I dont think I could have been a greater disappointment than I am now.
This is because you're a pedophile; not because you were hit as a kid.
If a restaurant says, "We don't serve Buddhists", then Buddhists say that's religious discrimination.
2 days later, they argue Buddhism isn't even a real religion.
Is Buddhism a religion or is it not?
Children should be hit really young if they mess up. It prevents them from fucking up in the future.
It's:
We need to progress more towards corporal punishment.
Right wing = Progressive.
Left wing = Regressive.
If I'm wrong, then prove it.
Every bullet point will cause the democrats to hop from one issue to the next. They can't concede because then they have to throw away their pride! They are too proud to admit they were wrong on all of their politics.
All you know is low IQ RageBait.
->Well, work is terrible on its own, but for women, its more difficult because they face sexual abuse at work as well as regular abuse, pressure, censorship, fear of job loss...ect.
Women have to pick their struggle too.
->Don’t throw your vote away again.
I'm going to throw my vote away again just to piss you off!
Get us rank choice voting or deal with spoilers!
-> Sure but a majority of physical strength isn't the same as a majority of political strength or influence.
But for men vs women, they are both correct statements because men have been trained by society to think more logically. If a woman gets emotional and violent, then nothing occurs. If a man replicates, then the woman attends the hospital. Men need a way to get women to stop being childish and emotional (turning off Wifi is a better way to discipline women than to punch them). Women can't replicate because she can punch and the man can't.
->but with regard to women's rights in general, even if people "accept reality" that doesn't mean they won't be resentful of it. Even repealing Roe is going to lead to some push back.
That pushback is long gone.
->A lot of households now rely on dual incomes, and stay at home parents could easily be at the mercy of an abusive spouse if they can't earn their own money.
The abused spouse can report.
->An 8th grader doesn't necessarily have the maturity to anticipate all that.
Would an 8th grader rather deal with the abuse of a spouse or the abuse of a boss? The choice is theirs. Life is abuse. Pick your poison.
->I said the strongest people, not the strongest person.
Well, we are always at the mercy of the strongest people if they have the majority of the global power.
-> If you try to screw over half of society it's gonna come back to bite the country as a whole.
It's a short term screwing. Roe got repealed, people complained short term but accepted that it's reality. It's how people are.
->There are diminishing returns to the expense on each student. It's not like spending twice as much would double everyone's salary, and to a large extent it's more cost effective to teach more people since resources can be communally shared or reused.
This is true, but $1 of education spent on a man is more useful than $1 spent on a woman because women (often) hate the stress of the workplace more often than men and men get bored from being in the home all the time (cabin fever), so the man is more likely to go outside to work if there exists no pressure to conform to a society where gender is irrelevant.
Maybe scrap the concept of gender roles, but teach every kid until 5th or 8th grade and then give them the option to pursue the, "stay at home/kid raising" path or the, "career/breadwinner" path where they learn education based on their 8th grade option.
->I mean I'm arguing with him right now? Not sure what else you're expecting.
See? Debby can't fathom the concept of your speech as an argument.
She's dumb and she happens to be a woman; I think there is a correlation or -1<r<0.
->Well you can say the same for any large majority. If everyone else in the world wanted to enslave you and me, they could.
So then we are not at the mercy of the strongest person then?
->Yeah and that made society significantly worse imo
In general, sure. The male part of society? No. I'm against legalizing marital rape, but it's only banned because society has decided that women have rights (which I'm not against). But any rights women have is maintained and enforced by men (and can be taken away at any time with no significant female pushback). I feel bad for women who get raped generally, but if they have no moral issues with Muhammod raping a 9 annum girl (and plenty do), then I don't feel bad if they get raped by someone other than me (I wouldn't rape due to my morality). The identical is applicable for men.
->I'm saying they should rather other people (women) are productive rather than treated as property and thus less motivated.
It should be up to the woman; although if the education budget is $1 billion and that can go to either 2x students of both genders combined or x male students, then each male is getting twice as much education money (and that might lead to better men even to the point where they outperform integrating women). It's an idea to have in the Overton window I would contest.
->That's part of the reason that we're not all at the mercy of the physically strongest people—there are a lot more ways to gain influence than brute force.
The strongest person in the world would lose in a fight against every other person combined in the world. That's not true for all the men vs all the women.
->I mean, making rape illegal seems like part of the bare minimum for a functioning society, no?
Marital rape was legal all the way until 1993. Men chose to make it illegal and if we made it legal again, then women can't effectively rebel. Women's rights are solely because of male generosity.
->Even if you're being totally selfish, treating a huge percentage of the population as property is going to backfire, because most people are more productive when they can choose their occupation and have basic rights.
Men prefer being powerful (Jeff Bezos) to being productive (Amazon worker).
->Women’s rights to their own bodies is as important as ever. Rape is a violation of that right.
All rights women have to their bodies are:
If men decided to legalize rape, then there is nothing a woman can practically do to stop or reverse that. You can withhold sex, but that's irrelevant if raping you is legal to begin with.
In other words, men decided that raping women would be illegal out of the goodness of our hearts because we wanted women to have some sense of power. Women are always at the legal mercy of men.
->But at some point, people will stop caring about rape
The left already does that with Muhammod (and perfect men get judged by our times).
->I'm guessing you watch porn and that
I don't. I quit porn a few months ago. I view it as addictive.
-> If that's the one thing they have to go on, then if they can afford to be picky, then the result is that they'll be picky about men's looks on dating apps.
I don't use dating apps.
->Women have libidos too, of course, but for the majority it's more contextually triggered, something that a woman wants to do with a man who she feels a certain connection with.
13% of the left wing female population is unwilling to sleep with the 13% of the male right wing population. Therefore, these women should expect to get raped in the same way how Florida sometimes can expect to get a hurricane (hurricanes and rape are both horrible, but they are predictable and uncontrollable, so prepare and adjust).
->Most women skew progressive but are not like the neurotic feminists who make for viral TikTok clips. Political compatibility is one factor they consider in a mate but as long as the differences aren't too extreme or in their face every day it's something they're willing to overlook
->Even with this having been said, conservative or politically moderate women exist and aren't some rare unicorn either (your own source identified more than a third of unmarried women as Republicans, in the age of frigging Trump).
And they are (with few exceptions) taken already (and they know that, so they make lives a living hell for their husbands because they are more desirable than even leftist women).
Massive gap (and women who voted for Harris will not date MAGA men by the standards of 2024).
I voted against Trump and don't want pussy (I'm a virgin, so I don't know what sex feels like). But I predict (negatively) that once these MAGA voting men realize they will be celibate, then they will resort to rape (and it will be so common that the cops just won't arrest them for it, and if cops know why it's occurring, which party do cops vote for?). Men can wear goggles to be immune to mace.
Rape and rapists would be normalized (and probably made a misdemeanor out of pragmatism once it's so frequent).
I'm not endorsing, but I'm predicting. Sometimes, I'm not an optimist, and while rape is immoral, not being an optimist sometimes isn't.
Critical Issues Poll December 17 2025.pdf
Pg 11:
51% of the US population is Islamophobic. Muhammod raped a 9 year old girl, it only makes sense.
When you tell this to Muslims, they can't argue against it, so they block out of pride and mental comfort.
But the truth is the truth.
->Start ignoring women. It does wonders, really.
The thing is, I don't want to be chased.
I want free speech more than I want sex. Dating means I might get sex, I lose all free speech because women will want empathy from men that they don't reciprocate.
->Shit talking is very much a two way thing.
Let women talk shit about me. IDGAF.
->I'm guessing that you are not actually a "college professor", seeing as you do not know how to spell bachelor.
I didn't say I have a PhD.
->I don't think that you have yet crossed the line between childishness and adult maturity.
Define, "maturity". Because I just think it means, "being a slave to a woman and enjoying it because she will be fine with you squirting in her vagina."
In our society, men have to empathize with women; women don't have to empathize with men.
College professors can have a sense of humor.
Talk shit about her. The first amendment protects the right to talk shit about women without her consent.
And free speech is more important than a woman's feelings (or a man's feelings, even if they're black, but a white man's feelings are also less valuable than a blabby and blubbery black woman's free speech powered by her EBT cards (that also go to benefit trailer trash white women with stinky legs with unwashed jeans)).
Although I got a rule (applies to Trump too). If you are blabby and blubbery, then your blab is walrus noise.
The right's person X is Donald Trump supporters.
The left's person X is Muhammod supporters (called Muslims).
Don't believe me? Ask your left wing friends.
Cultural IQ is what I refer too.
But it's different. You could see Hitler not wanting to murder rednecks if he was in charge of America. That's not true for FAAs.
You could see Julius Malema wanting to murder Rednecks but not FAAs if they are both in Africa.
Blacks are way more likely to support Hitler than whites are to support Julius Malema.
THAT is why white rednecks have higher IQs than FAAs on average.
And many blacks still love Hitler.
Why do you defend Epstein?
No white person agrees with “Kill the Boer”. But many blacks agree with, “Heil Hitler”.
Fine, but they are both better than the bear.
