My idea of being on top isn't by fucking women. It's politically. And procreation is done by AI too.
My idea of being on top isn't by fucking women. It's politically. And procreation is done by AI too.
->the opinion of popular majority matters only to those who seek to benefit from it.
So... politicians (the people who make laws)?
I'm not sure. I like the idea of winning and being on the top.
The following map is a rough estimation (most didn't comment on it) as to whether each state thinks that a woman can have a penis or not.
The kicker is that obviously red = no and blue = yes, but it's asked of the GOVORNERS of each state respectively.
Newsom (governor of a state that is D+20 in 2024 (CA) ) believes women cannot have penises. Healey (governor of a state that is D+25 in 2024 (MA) ) believes that a woman can indeed have a penis.
Because of these very vague points, the democrat candidate's position (because even red states have democrat candidates that just lose most of the time) is the one that is measured.
Red states are where the democrat candidates believe that woman can never, ever have a penis. Blue states are where elected democrat governors do believe that a woman can have a penis.
Yellow (Hawaii) I'm unsure about because it's a D+22 state and their governor is unsure.
But if by 2024 standards, it's more republican than CA, then I assumed it would be red because CA's governor believes only men can have penises and if it's more democrat than MA, then I assumed it's blue and the elected democrats there do believe that a woman can have a penis.
If you ask the majority of the population (even the red people in these blue states), then this map goes full red.
->So why would 100k Americans want to go live in a freezer?
Financial incentives, jobs. People that want to live on Mars and want a training ground. There will be people willing to move.
->Not sure if money will be as important in an AI dominated universe.
If AI does everything, then humans don't have to work. Money is useless as everything would be free because you don't need to work. Money is you paying for the work of the hundreds of strangers that directly or indirectly make your stuff. If robots are all of those strangers, then money is pointless and everything is free.
And here you are, commenting.
Only conservatives get to use the 2nd amendment to defend against tyranny. ICE is conservative.
->I'd rather be stuck in the forest with a bear than Pete or Vivek. The bear would give me a nice quick death, saving me from dying slowly, excruciatingly of boredom and cringe were I stuck with the alternative.
Don't vote.
->Women live longer are better insulated, and in terms of academic sciences generally out perform males...And the future will depend as much upon clever people as it will upon strong aggressively stupid people...And eggs are important of course.
We need 3 viable parties.
Human Rights Party (Zohran Mamdani, AOC, Ilhan Omar)
Libertarian Party (Pete Buttigieg, Vivek Ramaswamy, JD Vance)
America First Party (Nick Fuentes, Myron Gains)
I would vote Libertarian.
Let liberal women become lesbian. I don't give a fuck (literally and metaphorically). But make sure the future kids in the incubators are 100% men if all the men turn gay or ace. Men are better than women in every way if effort is equal except for giving birth (which is now obsolete). Men's bodies are just better.
-> Trump is good at finding excuses to invade a country. Seriously, what did Greenland do? Who the hell wakes up one day and thinks "we should invade Greenland"?
Same thing that made America expand to begin with. This is just a revival of territorial expansion.
-> So what happens when one NATO country invades another? When non-NATO country invades a NATO country, the country in NATO gets to activate NATO's defense, and gets defended by all NATO countries.
Not really; if the US decides to invade Northern Mexico, then we would say Mexico invaded the region that we want and the NATO comes to our defense. And you could probably just send 100k US settlers into Greenland and have them vote to join the US, so you even really need a war then. And if Denmark turns down the settlers, then troll them by saying, "No human being is illegal!"
Someone is desperate for attention (and it's the person who used this line first, aka you)!
You will never have anything useful to say and I think we are all aware on this site.
Your free speech is pointless speech, but we allow it.
Stick to your party. Call it the "human rights" party for all I care. Just understand that I'm not joining it.
He should do it. Send in 100k American settlers to Greenland and have them vote to join the US. Any left winger that is against this believes that "no human being is illegal" only applies to 3rd world humans; not 1st world American humans.
Any left winger that is against this is inheritely America last and Greenland first and nothing will change my mind on that. I don't support human rights, I support American rights. They are 100% mutually exclusive.
Waltz was a Zionist.
If you're a single woman, then you're almost certainly left wing.
If you're a single man, then you're almost certainly right wing.
1 year ago, right wing men were open to dating left wing women. Left wing women lost interest. Men got acclimated to it. We went to the gym. We studied for exams. All without women's help.
Women were searching for that sole left wing dude that didn't exist because they were already taken.
Now, women went from saying, "If you voted for Trump in 2024, then you're ghosted permanently." to having itchy vaginas saying, "We won't want you if you're conservative, but change your views and THEN we will accept you!"
What conservative men have learned is:
Men learned that women are stupid. Because of that, it's irrelevant if the woman is liberal or conservative, men flat out do not want a woman who is both stupid (unchangeable) and dominant (changable).
Men do not like women having any power because they chose the bear (shows what they would do if they had power).
Men have lost interest in women. They have learned to embrace solitude and to be scared of naggy women. Notice how incel culture died off? Notice how Charlie Kirk's successor is Myron Gains?
Who's more to the right?
Young men who voted in 2024 are very conservative and Gen Alpha men (who can't vote) in 2023 are showing even stronger signs of conservatism. These people (many of them) have never even had sex. They are not hooked by a woman's vagina and the allure of "dating", they view it as expensive, the woman as bratty, and they've lost interest (because they aren't addicted to sex).
Women say, "Don't date us unless you change your conservative ways!" Men say, "So be it."
I saw this left wing woman who was trying to hit on Ben Shapiro. THAT is desperation.
Women want men more than men want women in 2026; and in order for men to desire to date women more, the following has to occur:
Until this occurs, I can see lonely women staying that way for the rest of their vitality. Men have accepted solitude as their default.
Where did you locate that information?
It sounds like Waltz is using coded language. "Criminals taking our welfare" sounds similar to, "inner city thugs". Not everyone in the inner city is black, but you can read between the lines.
Tim Waltz is going the way of MAGA.
->It's the thinking of a feminized society.
Not really. Women submit to men (it's their evolution instinct; they're worried about getting beat up if they don't whether the man is violent or not). Blame the Irish; this is the result of an Irishized society.
Anytime a white liberal tells you to "check your privilege" ask them, "What's your last name?" There is a pretty strong chance that it's Irish.
People with Irish last names need to be pressured to Anglicize them. The Germans were pressured to do it when Hitler can to power.
To be Irish is to support cancel culture (from either party). Cancel culture on them is merely to preserve the American identity of freedom of speech (so it's self defense really). And I'm not saying get them fired for their last name; I'm saying they should Anglicize their last names to indicate that they side with America and not Ireland, and if they don't, then they are assumed to love cancel culture and to hate America (and they shouldn't be deported for these beliefs, but they should be made fun of for it).
And stereotypes exist for a reason.
Stereotypes exist as group criticisms so those groups improve or defend their mannerisms.
Republicans' chances of flipping Minnesota.
Tim Waltz is going MAGA. He called the Somalis "criminals".
He's a Nazi fascist!
Yep. And there's nothing you can do to stop me.
Every single insult or condescending remark YOU (Sidewalker) make I will endorse without question from a 100% sarcastic standpoint because I know you have nothing better to present.
Takes one to know one.
Admit it; republicans are just better than democrats.
Basically eye for an eye?
I could get behind that.
Rape every rapist once with a machine and that's their sole penalty for raping a woman.
Because rape objectively not as bad as murder, so it deserves a less severe penalty.
I don't think rape should be legal, but I also don't want it punishable by death either. Just a simple castration should be sufficient.
->So keeping it illegal still serves a purpose to prevent a serial rapist from raping again, as well as creating incentive not to commit rape.
But if rape is legal and rape only occurs because of power, then where doe the power of rape come from? The power of rape comes from the fact that a crime that is treated in the same ballpark as murder to a living person, that living person will be unable to report it.
People with $2 billion have less power than people with $2 billion that live in countries where having over $1 billion is illegal. If a rapist knows he can commit a felony to a living person that knows it's a felony and get away with it, then he's more likely to rape if rape is illegal vs if rape isn't even a crime if his goal is power.