Aright, but the logical goal isn't power either. Otherwise, legalizing rape reduces rape rates because the power incentive is gone.
Do you think we should legalize rape?
Aright, but the logical goal isn't power either. Otherwise, legalizing rape reduces rape rates because the power incentive is gone.
Do you think we should legalize rape?
Why not? It's a fact isn't it?
Rape is either about:
If rape is about power, then how could that be the case?
Analogy mode:
You know who has more power than someone with $2 billion? Somebody with $2 billion that lives in a country where it's illegal to be a billionaire, but they get away with it due to government inaction. If you legalize all billionaires, then the actual billionaire loses a lot of power over the, "victims" (the people who made them billionaires).
You know who has more power than a rapist? Somebody who rapes that lives in a country where it's illegal to be a rapist, but they get away with it due to government inaction. If you legalize all rape, then the actual rapist loses a lot of power over the victims (the people who got raped).
Therefore, I would argue that if rape is solely or primarily about power, legalizing rape means you get less rape.
If rape is about sexual pleasure, then right now, rape is a felony. If a few individuals out there commit rape primarily about sexual pleasure despite the risk that they might have their life ruined permanently over it, then that must mean the pleasure achieved from initial sexual contact for the man is extremely strong, it's safe to call it addicting.
So sex is objectively addicting. So is tobacco. Smoking tobacco is only legal if the supplier consents (tobacco store). Sex is only legal if the supplier consents (woman).
Stealing sex is sex rape (robbing sex, a crime comparable to murder). Stealing tobacco is smoke rape (robbing tobacco, a crime that's a misdemeanor).
If smoke rape was charged equally to sex rape (or if all rape was proportionally charged), then nobody would realistically ever commit product rape. Rape and theft would become interchangeable terms.
But sex theft is seen as very bad presumably because people want sex a lot. Only the non-virgins will understand. I don't have too because I'm a virgin.
But sex should be viewed as an addictive thing to do.
->Are you really that desperate for attention?
I'm not desperate for your attention, but you willingly give it to me anyways, so I take it.
What does this have to do with my initial post?
It's not a victory, it merely means that side is WINNING. No issue is ever 100% settled. You can find people willing to legalize mass shootings.
And conservatives are willing to argue for their positions more than the liberals are, so that 80% is expected to decrease as time goes on.
80% think Transwomen are men and 80% think that abortion should be legal. 80% is left wing on abortion and 80% is right wing on transgenderism.
The 20% of Canadians that are right wing on abortion have way more stamina to debate their positions to the 80% that disagree with them than the 20% of Americans who are left wing on transgenderism have to debate the 80% who disagree with them.
And it's 80% of Canadians who are left wing on abortion. In America, it's about 60%. Kirk's death though is causing the whole country to shift massively more right wing to the point where (on paper) the democrats won in NJ and VA handsomely, but it's because the democrat politicians have gone more right wing in these areas. Mamdani is a classic 2016 style democrat who ran against Cuomo (who is a classic 2016 style republican). Mamdani won, but only by 7 pts and NYC went blue in 2017 by 60 pts.
The bottom line is if republicans make gains, then it's proof that the country has gone more conservative since 2016. If the democrats make gains, then it's evidence that the democrats have gotten more conservative since 2016.
Men can correct Chat GPT, women assume it's 100% factual.
Men use it as a tool; women use it as a god.
I'll take your word for it. It's a good point if true.
People hate Hitler for a genocide. They call him PEAK evil.
But FDR did a genocide and people don't call him, "Peak evil".
Why is that?
Hitler did the genocide after 6 terms. FDR only needed 4 to break.
Power curropts you; it curropts everyone.
->with figures around 80% supporting a woman's right to choose, according to a 2024 Leger poll.
I simply disagree with the 80% and think the 80% should be converted to 0%. And if you are Canadian, then you should leave the 80%.
Well, if men did the work women did, then women probably would use 80% of Chat GPT.
Using Chat GPT for arguments is bad because Chat GPT doesn't address everything.
->Not my fault the things you say keep getting dumber.
We won't agree on this point. You have a party to stick too whether you want to admit it or not (call it the "Human rights" party). I just think "Human rights" are a marketing term meant to deceive gullible individuals.
->What you are arguing is tantamount to me walking into your home and claiming I have a right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, which for me means living in your house.
Very right wing-libertarian argument here. But you being on DART means you have to read my offensive speech. If you can't stand it, then get off the internet (hint: It's run by Zionists).
But free speech restricts only the government; but every individual is a government of 1.
->Around 50% of men use GenAI tools compared to 37% of women, a notable divide.
Learning from Chat GPT and copying and pasting in an argument are different.
That's just more Chat GPT talk that addresses nothing that I said.
See, women are so bad at arguing that they have to resort to Chat GPT.
2-9:If this happened, then that's bad, but provide a source.
10: Calling someone a "demon" or "mutant" is free speech because it's legal to be a demon or a mutant (and we are all mutants).
11: This is DOE KIP speech which should be outlawed.
13: Make all bathrooms gender neutral.
14: You should be allowed to share your pronouns, others shouldn't be forced to use them. In fact, you can refer to Cadence Owens as he/him and I don't think too many people would get upset for too long even if it's satire free speech.
->This is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever heard you say.
Until I say the next thing you think is stupid.
->The entire purpose of the constitution of to protect individual liberty from the government.
Liberty? You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means. I support liberty of offensive speech; you support liberty from offensive speech.
-> then any further conversation is pointless.
With you, it is. The right learned this with Charlie Kirk's death. Now, the right is being even more unfiltered because we know we are hateful no matter what according to the left.
Canada's abortion laws are too left wing.
Canada's abortion laws are too left wing.
How?
Transgenders committing cancel culture.
The 1st amendment states that the government can't discriminate based on speech. Every individual is their own government. NY has a government of 20 million. The US is a government of 340 million. A Trans person is a government of 1.
Therefore, if transgenders commit cancel culture (where they disassociate based on political opinions), then they are violating the 1st amendment as the 1st amendment restricts the government (and every individual is their own government).
->You do realize that the impacts on one’s body that comes along with creating a whole other human being goes far beyond 9 months of pain… right?
What other stuff?
A zygote's life matters more than a woman's health as murder is worse than cancer.
->Nonetheless, voluntary abortion is an effective solution to a perceived problem.
But it's immoral and a zygote's life matters more than 9 months of woman's inconvenience.
But what % of same sex couples do IVF? I would think it's very low.
Family formations in fertility treatment 2022 | HFEA states that 89% of IVF cases were straight parents.
Banning abortion goes against procreation? How?
Believe that if you want, but the left has gone right wing on COVID vacciene mandates.
Alright; if Trump was guilty, then they had 10 years, why didn't they impeach him? Why wasn't Trump prosecuted before he entered public office in 2016 (so like 2012)?
But straight women do that as well and at comparable rates. Gay men adopt kids that were produced by whores.
So then they should brag to liberal women about how they will never get an abortion so they have more hope.
Solidarity is dead in American society. Every group is rushing to become the top.
->Were you rejected by a bunch of white women or something?
Not really, although women are massive hypocrites for claiming that nobody wants them as their DMs are full. If women flat out say, "We're done with men. We're going asexual or lesbian", then I wouldn't hate them because they're honest. It's the dishonest straight women that I hate for being dishonest. If you don't want to date a strange dude, then just say so and become asexual for the rest of your life.
->There are way, way better ways to select for intelligence than gender.
I want a minimum IQ of 115 to get to vote. But intelligence is something that you maintain, and I think women would rather look at cute dogs than watch videos that they think are "hate speech" (if liberal women) or, "grooming the kids" (if they're conservative women).
I also think that stat is outdated because men are more competitive than women and they know that a high IQ means you're respected more than 60 years ago, so men I think now have higher IQs than women because they put in more effort and women simply do not want to put that amount of effort in. Anytime a woman writes a very long response, I assume she just went to Chat GPT. I don't use Chat GPT to argue.