https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ5HKswUzD4.
Lesson: The smart black people (usually) go into medicine and the smart white people (usually) go into finance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ5HKswUzD4.
Lesson: The smart black people (usually) go into medicine and the smart white people (usually) go into finance.
What makes me stupid in your opinion? I will only argue if you are actually willing to change your mind, because if not, then there's no point.
→C'mon man, everybody knows that he will.
Exactly.
FLRW and I are high IQ; we can predict the future.
→In a best case scenario, where the homeless don't commit crimes or otherwise intimidate the surrounding population, they still have to use the bathroom somewhere.
That's why all restaurant bathrooms should be free whether or not you are a paying customer.
Do you honestly think Trump is going to help end homelessness? An easy way to deal with homelessness is to house a bunch of homeless people at Maro Lago.
He is all talk, no action.
If you are a MAGA person that doesn't consider this a deal breaker to Trump, then you don't consider someone supporting pedophillia to be a deal breaker. Lets call a spade a spade.
That's inaccurate and boring.
Both of you (even if this message is big) should read the whole thing, let me know that you received it if you have nothing else to say, and respond to it if you do have stuff to say. I notice so many people of both genders say, “TLDR”. It gets annoying for me because I don't do that with other people and it feels like I wasted a lot of time typing someone that people don't even end up reading.
→Women are not choosing a bear over a man. They are choosing a bear, who might run instead of attack, to the worst man and the worst thing they can imagine (as Wryly so aptly pointed out).
So then make the claim, “I'd rather be with a bear than a rapist”, not, “I'd rather be with a bear than a man I don't know”. Men might prefer getting raped to getting murdered, but virtually every man understands both are very evil and wouldn't complain nearly as hard about women that say they would rather get murdered than raped (and this is coming from me; me personally, I would rather get raped 100x than murdered). But if a woman disagrees, then it's their opinion. If it was not, “Man vs Bear” but instead, “Rapist vs Bear”, then I would not be making this post.
→It isn't based on data
If data doesn't matter, then a man could say, “I'd rather be with a bear than a strange woman; bears don't falsely accuse of SA”. Of course data should matter! If data doesn't matter, then don't get the vaccine, but instead, listen to the fear of RFK on vaccinees. But that would be loony.
→And the minute you think, “this is unlikely to happen to me,” you stop safeguarding yourself and that is often unwise.
It's unlikely that I get robbed, but I lock my door (aka safeguard). Women can have pepper spray and no decent man would hate them for it.
→And ALL OF US HUMANS have fears, based on real things that have happened more than once, but that are statistically unlikely to actually happen to you.
And I have had multiple black people beat the shit out of me up over trivial things (one because I defended desalination plants, the other because I threw a napkin in the trash bin, so it's not even race related in the slightest). I'd rather be with a black person I don't know than a bear. But I'd rather be with the bear than with either of those individual black people (I can mace the bear legally).
→we look everyone up online before letting them near our children and we even teach our children to NEVER talk to a stranger
If you have kids, then you would rather have them be with a stranger than a bear (
). Best case scenario, the bear leaves your kid alone (best case scenario for the humans is they adopt the kid). The alternative is murder/rape. We can disagree on which is worse, murder or rape. We better agree though that strangers adopting your child is better than having your child starve in the woods.
→Most women will always say “bear” because we don't encounter them often and we know they dont usually attack unless cubs are around or they think you are being aggressive.
Usually, the bear will not murder you (but like 85% chance of survival with no mace). For the man if he sees you, then it's 99.95%. The strange man is out in the woods because he likes nature and wanted to hike. Rape happens at parties where there is alcohoul.
→But I do suspect the OP did not “just” begin to hate women, as he claims, with the bear vs man question. I believe he found a safe vehicle for his bitterness and hatred and pounced on it like a hungry wolf.
Well, then how do I prove that my hatred for women literally began with “Men vs Bear”?
I'm a virgin (by choice; I'm young, and I didn't want women to get pregnant and have to pick between a poverty birth or abortion (they say both of these options suck)), I'm getting the vasectomy before I have sex, I'm pro choice anyway (I even did a recent debate on it here if you think I'm bluffing), I voted against Trump and would have preferred Harris to Trump (I was hoping Trump didn't rape because rape sucks, but if he did rape, then I would want him executed). I've made fun of men that rack up a high body count with women but then want a virgin woman to marry and I call on anti abortion men to get vasectomies before they have sex again.
I was no misogynist before “Man vs Bear” and if you want me to go back to that, then women en masse need to discard, “Man vs Bear” and admit they were incorrect similar to what they did with, “Believe women” (which I've toggled on that issue, I leaned against “Believe women” overall but there were times when I supported it I think, but I didn't hate women for supporting “Believe women” like I do now. I just didn't want to repeal the 5th amendment because it was a dangerous precedent). I don't hate women for wanting to close the wage gap. The wage gap between women and men is similar to the wage gap between whites and Indian Americans (Indian Americans earn more). Treat men the same way you would Indian Americans on this issue.
There are many hypocrites on the right. Replace, “Man” with, “Illegal immigrant” and the right selects bear. That's crazy too. I voted against Trump in 2024. “Fell for it again” doesn't apply to me.
I will try and respond to every roast as proof that I am reading these.
All roasts are fine if they're accurate.
If you say, “You're only 3'4" ” then that doesn't count because I'm not and if false roasts are fine, then a roast is a random thought that can be applied to anybody.
I am not above my own standard.
I believe that nobody is above being made fun of, including myself.
This thread proves it.
Roast me as hard as you can.
To the left, I'm transphobic.
My thought process:
Right wing says XX=Female, XY=Male, no exceptions.
Left wing calls this transphobia.
The right denies being transphobic.
The argument then becomes, “Is the right transphobic?”
The left believes saying XX=Female, XY=Male is transphobic; but if the right accepts the label, then the debate can be about, “Is transphobia good?” instead of, “Is the right transphobic?”
Why be scared of a legal and common label?
I'm transphobic. Nothing wrong with it.
I support them doing their humor.
The same would be true if they were making fun of trans people or any left wing group.
Both major parties support making fun of only degenerates and not real Americans (degenerate = person they disagree with, real American = person they agree with).
I'd rather make fun of everybody as a matter of principle.
→"Identarian" as in far right pan-European ideologue.
Identitarianism with the trans stuff is, “Anyone who identifies as a woman is a woman”.
→I will never abandon support for trans people. They are precious and need to be protected 🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️
Within limits.
If a trans person says something retarted, then they should be called out for it. But if they say something good, then credit where it's due.
Alright; we both agree on identarian absolutism, but we disagree on if it classifies as tranphobia. I have no problem with adopting a scary (but accurate) label for myself.
→I'm sure the feeling is mutual; women hate you so it's only fair that you should hate women.
We not the same; they hate me because of my chromosomes/gender identity; I hate them for disparagement as worse than a dangerous animal. I had no hatred of women before Man vs Bear; I never sent them an unsolicited dic pic in my life; everytime I asked out a woman and she refused, I directly said, “Your denial is respected and I will treat you identically before this” (it's what women want). I would get the vasectomy before I had sex so she wouldn't have to deal with pregnancy.
2 years ago, if a woman said how life was unfair for her as a woman, I'd hear her out. Now, if she were to say that, I'd laugh my ass off. You don't get treated worse than a bear by anybody.
I used to think women were logical individuals when required to be (ex: politics) to roughly the same extent as a man; I was wrong.
They are herd followers; their opinions depend on their mood; a man's opinion depends on his logic.
Don't let anyone with an IQ under 120 vote; weed out emotional voters.
I wouldn't care if women have opinions like this if they don't get voting rights. 8 year old kids believe all sorts of stupid things; and that's fine (but only because we don't let them vote).
A minimum IQ of 120 should be required to vote in any election. If your IQ is lower, then build it up to 120 and THEN you can vote.
→If you were in a room with a transsexual would you be irrationally fearful. If not, then you are not transphobic.
I wouldn't be fearful, but I wouldn't believe they are a woman just because they say they are. Does this make me transphobic?
→Most people won't be transphobic
What does it mean to be transphobic? Because I thought it was anyone who wasn't an identarian absolutist (ie, your gender is solely how you identify).
If that is the definition you want to work with, then most people are already transphobic. If you want to make the definition more strict, then present me your definition of a transphobe.
Anyone that disagrees with the following statement is transphobic:
“A woman is anyone that identifies as a woman.”
I didn't want this to be the definition, but the left insisted that this is the definition.
Alright; 66% of the US population is transphobic then (https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/02/26/americans-have-grown-more-supportive-of-restrictions-for-trans-people-in-recent-years/).
Doesn't bother me to be transphobic; we're the majority. It was 52% 8 years ago (https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/06/28/americans-complex-views-on-gender-identity-and-transgender-issues/).
And Trump's term has only started. Imagine what it will be in 3 years. In 2026, the democrats aren't even running on trans rights (1st amendment rights > trans rights because free speech rights > bathroom rights) like they were in 2022; it's all economic.
When the most popular transwoman activist is a broke meth user that is 28 years old and has to live with their family out of economic desperation (and meth is even on their family wall, implying that there is a good chance their entire family uses meth and supportive of their meth habit), and only 10% of the US population even supports legalizing meth (implying that 90% would send this individual to jail or rehab (aka drug conversion therapy) ), this is not looking very optimal for the trans community.
To be transphobic is to be normal, to be a trans ally is to be inconsistent.
→Another man whinging about the man vs bear meme like it's a personal attack.
Well then what is it then (if you even read to this comment, you probably are rightfully traumatized from this chat)?
Here is where you should move too along with the rest of the low IQ women that got too many foot rubs in their life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umoja,_Kenya
→That's because bears generally keep to their own space in the forest and wont even come near you in 99% cases.
Exceptions exist though; a man/woman in the forest is just hiking.
→If ugly woman hit on me, I would be insulted because she either thinks my standards are so low or she thinks I have very poor eye sight.
Or you could say her vagina is too loose.
→Women have normalized degrading talk towards men, so I am just returning the favor.
Wait; you were being SARCASTIC?! That's funny.
Women who refuse to call this hate speech are too pussy to admit it.
Your feelings don't matter to men (unless they are trying to stick their penis in your vagina, your asshole, or your mouth, then they lie and pretend that your feelings matter). If you hate men that much, then become lesbian and don't reproduce; you might get a boy (that will turn into a man).
Another bitch with loose pussy energy that will say calling a strange transman a woman violates their human rights but calling a strange transman more dangerous than a bear doesn't.
Move to the woods; get away from all the infrastructure built by strange men you don't know.
→ You see a bear in the woods, you mace the bear.
No, I don't.
Why not? You need to live.
→Small bears also cannot even kill you even if they tried.
Highly unlikely.
→Unless you do something stupid, you wont.
What would make you say that?
→Some people work in zoo and see bear 30000 times.
That bear is in a cage and is domesticated. Not a wild bear.
→Some people have bears as pets for decades.
And they say it's extremely tough because they are wild animals at the end of the day. It's not a chiwawa. It's a bear.
→Small bears also cannot even kill you even if they tried.
They could. Some dogs can kill me if it they tried.
→I could also say even a better comparison of ugly women to lets say, cats, fox or rabbits, or birds.
If you prefer a rabbit to a woman, then THAT is fine. A bear though is loony.
→because bear causes no harm
You are way too optimistic about bears. Just saying.
→ Bears, even most dangerous ones, in total, kill less than 1 person per year in whole USA. Women kill 2000 people per year, and that's when excluding accidents caused by women. If we include accidents, abuse by women, suicide, and everything else, you would get the number of over 30000.
You may encounter women 1 million times for every interaction you have with a bear.
You can dislike women; that's fine. The moment you say they are worse than wild animals because you don't know them; we have a problem.
Humans > Animals that can rip your head off.
→She can also murder you by poisoning, she can blackmail you, she can report you falsely, she can threaten to report you unless you do as she says.
If you run into contact with 10,000 women, then virtually none of them will kill you. I probably see a woman in person 10000x a year. If you run into contact with a bear 10,000x, then you are almost certainly going to die. You may survive 1,2, or 3 encounters with a bear. After 10,000 instances, you're dead. Nobody encountered a bear 10,000x in the woods and survived.
You see a bear in the woods, you mace the bear. If you see a strange woman in the woods, then if you mace the woman, then you're a monster.