RemyBrown

So if one criminal gets released without a punishment, we should release a bunch of other criminals without a punishment? I think this makes about as much sense as saying that if an innocent person gets unfairly executed, we should execute all innocent people to make it fair.

The precedent would be established by Lindsay Clancy that, "mental illness" lets you get away with murder.

It's not the precedent that I want to set. But if women want to keep rape illegal, then just kill Lindsay Clancy for murder. I don't like setting bad precedents, but if a bad precedent is set, then I will want that precedent to be carried out to a very powerful extent and if the precedent sucks, then repeal it. It's similar with gerrymandering; the dems were against it, the GOP endorsed it, Abby from Virginia is like, "I'm anti gerrymandering, but if yall insist that gerrymandering is fine, then I'll gerrymander 10x harder". I'm fine with Abigail doing that because I'm indifferent about gerrymandering; but the OP was basicly saying, "Femenists; be careful of the precedent you set."

So why is execution not murder

The same reason why imprisonment isn't kidnapping; the state gets a pass sometimes.

 If your mother or sister was the victim, would you have an opinion then?

They're strong and independent women; I let them figure out their own problems.

Murder is worse than rape.

A man that rapes a woman deserves the same penalty that Lindsay Clancy will get for murdering her kids (I don't know the penalty she got yet).

But murder is worse than rape and if SkyWalker comments, then I'll probably ignore him.

I'd be fine with executing both.

Yes I did. I'm not being sarcastic.

The left will claim we need to show support for the gay community and then they will use, "gay" as an insult to attack conservative positions.

Their support for cisgender straight gay people is a facade at this point (and it's not to say the left wants to ban gay marriage, but being gay to the left is like being Jewish; they don't want prosecution for the gays, but it's not like they think gays are oppressed anymore either (I mean, gays earn more than straight men do; they're fiscally conservative)).

Do they put America first or Israel first?

American Jews will simultaneously claim:

1. They put America above Israel.
2. We can't annex Canada because it makes it tougher to defend Israel (America has 2 million more Jews than Muslims; Canada has 1.8 million more Muslims than Jews and all those Muslims would vote to end US funding to Israel).

The American Jews want the US to fund Israel for reasons that objectively make sense; Hamas kills Jews; Jews don't want to die, they will use a small amount of money to be alive. In reality, we can annex Canada, and America can even be more Muslim than Jewish while Israel still gets funding.

It's not like American Jews are known to be broke; they have lots of money. American Jews make up 2% of the US population and 6% of the net worth ($7 Trillion total). Every American Jew can annually just donate .05% of their net worth to Israel annually so Israel gets the same amount of funding that they get right now (and this is election proof; a Mamdani like person can literally be president and Israel is still safe).

$1.7 million raised in scheme for Hamas, including from U.S. donors, prosecutors say, announcing charges - CBS News says that Gaza only gets $600k in donations a year. Think about that.

Gaza gets less donations annually than the combined salary of Trump and Vance; people don't donate to Gaza (and why would they? Prety much the only people that would donate to Gaza are not even Muslims, but actual Gazans).

If every Jewish person with a net worth of $1 million donated $500/year to Israel (and the same proportion for jews with more/less money), than Israel gets funding in a safer way; and THEN American Jews can consistently claim that their loyalities are to America first; Israel 2nd.

I want to be a virgin for my whole life. Do you want to have sex with me (I'm guessing you're above 18)? If not, then you prefer me being a virgin.

Logic avoids sex because sex is destructive. If you disagree, then have sex with me. You wouldn't want too because it would destroy you (and for Kohai, no, I don't want to force Debby or any woman, man, nonbinary, or child to have sex with me).

And humans and monkeys have their roots in some ancient primate. Lebron James is not a highly developed monkey; he's a human.

Do we have political genes

Yes.

we all focus on sex because we are inherently programmed to do that.

But they focus on sex more than logic.

Therefore, probably just merge the sections.

Christain's perfect man: Jesus.

Islam's perfect man: Muhommond.

Who was better? Jesus; exactly.

Rage Bait = Right wing speech that the left can't classify as hate speech or misinformation because it's true.

Getting America to have the soccer industry grow.

To demonstrate the left's genetic frequent political incompetence. They prefer to focus on sex because it feels good short term.

Right... "They"... As in one idiot on TikTok.

One idiot on TikTok, and 2 idiots on Debate Craft (SkyWalker and Debby). So much for, "this place is for HIGHER level thinking". You think they vet who is allowed to make an account here? They don't. Anyone can post; most just choose not to.

So much of your party cares more about sex than logic.

They vote, so them being retarted is no excuse.

One tiktok where a leftist makes a bad argument proves that no one on the left has any points?

Not nobody. But certainly not the transgender RageBaiting about a Kirk 3 some with Trump and Musk, and not SkyWalker or Debby. You start to notice patterns. Many on the left can't make good arguments, so they make absurd sexual ad hommeims (which is more Rage Bait than what I do to them by calling them hypocrites). Many on the left are more obsessed with sex than with logic and such capitas deserve to be ignored. With few exceptions, I don't respond to SkyWalker anymore and Debby is well on the way to that; they can't attack my arguments, so they claim I am gay and want anal sex because their brains just think about sex.

Edit: I originally read the post title as "Why the left has no points." Remy's post is actually making a more modest claim than I thought.

Understandable.

The left calls conservatives gay. I call the left hypocrites. My Rage Bait is better.

Anal sex isn't for humans; it spreads disease.

Tangent, get back to the main focus.

The US should get over 9/11 is my point.

That’s fine.

They can’t think in American; they don’t emulate human behavior well enough.

Baby formula is real. Baby formula isn’t sacred.

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8KkWsyh/

They resort to absurd sexual jokes and accuse the right of Rage Baiting.

Next world cup, America should become #1. That should be our goal; to get more football goals than everyone else and rename quarterback football into brownball because that ball is actually brown.

9/11 was 25 yrs ago; get over it.

Human beings are Primates, of course we have primate tendencies.

Do you wish to associate with baboons? If so, then you're not black.

Why did you find it discouraging? In what way did you find it "on par" with drinking and smoking?

Clohera and syphilis is in your butt.

Bonobos and Chimpanzees: Bonobos frequently engage in non-reproductive sexual contact, including same-sex and anal interactions, to reduce social tension and build community bonds.

Bighorn Sheep: Groups of male bighorn sheep have been documented engaging in mounting and anal intercourse.

American Bison: Full anal penetration between male bulls has been observed during courtship and mounting behaviors.

Primates: Certain monkeys, such as rhesus macaques, have been observed participating in reciprocal mounting with anal penetration. National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov) +3

Is your goal to copy the role models of Monkeys, Sheep, and Bison? Hopefully No as these animals are stupid.