How often do you think I shower?
How often do you think I shower?
It is sacred because the milk from cows can keep human babies alive.
So can your breasts. But you are not sacred.
There are 4.5 to 5 million Muslims in the USA, what is their opinion on the subject.
They're useful for helping the US to annex Canada.
Hindus believe a cow is an all powerful all knowing god that doesn't want to be eaten. Such a god in Kansas would grow a biological jetpack and fly to India.
That doesn't happen because cows aren't gods.
The internet lets me see British Muslims.
You know you want it Remy...Don't keep fighting it.
Projection accusation denied.
Are you arguing women being useful aside from making kids is rare or that it never happens?
I'm saying women being useful aside from making kids is less common than for men. A woman can be useful, but it's more common a man is useful than a woman is (aside from making kids).
There are women making progress on unsolved math problems and winning Olympiads. I think it's unlikely you or most men could make the same progress as the top women with equal effort.
Such women put more effort into math than either one of us did. They have PhDs in math. Getting a PhD requires immense effort.
The smartest women is not dumber than the dumbest man, if that's what you're implying. If you really want to defend that then we can debate it but it seems so obviously false I'm gonna assume I'm somehow misunderstanding your point.
You misunderstood and that's fine. The smartest woman in the world puts way more effort into her intelligence than the dumbest man in the world, but she's dumber than any man who puts equal effort into his intelligence as she did for hers.
men have a finite amount of time to learn tasks, so women can always find some job the man isn't doing.
Yes ... the women do easier jobs for less pay. You think sweatshops were the normal job in the 1920s? No. Sweatshops were a woman's job then. Now, those jobs are largely automated in the US.
And they have a pretty big incentive to make money however they can.
Cheap labor.
If being a member of a below average group made someone not useful, then the vast majority of people would not be useful since they're in the group of "not the smartest or strongest person in the world."
People are useful even if they're below average, but men are more useful than women. A quarter and a nickel have different values, but you'd take both. But you'd rather have 2 quarters than 2 nickels if you can only get 2 coins and if you can get more, then you'd want all the coins to be Quarters. In the 1920s, the Quarters worked non sweatshop jobs.
Their opinions don't matter; their brains go through post pantoum psycosis all of the time. They only matter for sex, not for killing babies. The Muslims that the UK is importing agree with me.
Define, "small minded".
Define, "normal boundaries". That's the thing; normal boundaries is a constraint for women; not men.
What % of astronauts have been women in history? Exactly. You can find women willing to undergo the stress to become an astronaut, but they're very rare.
Such women are the exception; women astronauts are not normal; they're rare for a reason.
In all other ways they are equal.
That's fake. Men are better at every skill than women if the effort and dedication to said skill is equal.
But can they not do at least most of the things men can do?
They can ... just not as well.
Do women have to do a task better than men on average for there to be women who are productive in some way?
Yes, otherwise I would replace them with a man.
There are female inventors, female therapists, female office workers, etc.
Female inventors are maybe 5% of inventors. Men make better therapists than women, but they're less interested in such emotional jobs; women get the leftovers. Men work at the office better; they're less likely to file HR complaints.
Due to individual comparative advantage (i.e. different people being good at different things), it's not like you can just replace any women in any role with a man
With every useful task out there, every man is better than every woman if they put in equal effort. Some women are better at math than me because they put in way more effort. But take any woman out there, she will be worse than math than me if we put equal effort into the subject. Testosterone is for power; estrogen is for aestetics.
If you go to the restaurant and you get a waitress, are you gonna leave or demand a male server?
I don't eat at restaurants because of the price; but women do a better job here because they look better. A woman chef makes one meal for her family. A male chef makes hundreds of meals for strangers. Maybe one is better than the other per meal, but chefs make more meals than housewives because the work environment stresses out the highly estrogenated.
Is a woman useful for anything besides sex/kid making? For the longest time, I wanted to believe the answer was yes. I wanted to believe that women could do at least some tasks better than men. I wasn't expecting them to be better at everything. Men were better at math, but perhaps women are better at resolving disputes and creating peace.
But then I've come to learn that women only create peace with men that are rich. If a man has as much money as a woman, then she causes him stress. If I date a girl and I lose my job, then she won't help me get a new one; she'll leave me.
A woman is loved if she's beautiful. A man is only loved if he's rich (I'm not saying multi millionaire, but minimum salary $60k/annum in the US). A man who earns less than that will either be single or have a woman who's a pain. A man who earns more than that will be spending a massive amount of that money to maintain that woman's happiness.
If that man gets fired, then the woman is going to leave.
So why have a woman around? Sex and kids. But I don't want kids and I don't want sex, so I don't really see a woman in my life, and I'm not gay, so I'd rather be single for my whole vitality.
Other people have other things to occupy their time with.
Politically, like what? If Lindsay is freed, then I can murder you and blame it on post pantoum psycosis.
What else should I associate women with? Headaches? Pettiness? Estrogen ruining their ability to think?
Because the left is petty.
Petty is an adjective that describes something of little importance, a person who is small-minded or overly concerned with trivial matters
You've just described the left. They're small minded. If you disagree, then define, "small minded".
Define that too.
Define, "extreme".
I define petty as hating a perfectly correct message because you, “don’t like the tone”.
Change it. The only right women should get that children don’t is the right to have and refuse sex.
Tribalism is an actual primate tendency.
You do this yourself, so you’re a hypocrite.
I don’t know how to make this less Rage Bait like.
Jewish people will say there is nothing wrong with not being white. But if you tell them, “Jews are not white”, then they act like you’re an anti semite.
Jews are from Israel, Israel is in the Middle East; only ethnic Europeans are white (and it’s ok to not be white). But it’s only ok to be non white if you don’t get offended at being called non white. Otherwise, you’re a snowflake.
Im not calling Jews pedophilles (over 95% of Jews aren’t wanting to rape children, I have to clarify this for Kohai because while he is Jewish, he has a Queer brain and they’re snowflakes (even though he’s a Zionist)). But Jews aren’t white; they’re Israeli, and they vote in line with Israeli values. This isn’t to say they put Israel above America (Israeli Americans put America before Israel), but the values associated with Israel (left wing except for Zionism).
THIS is how Israelis vote; and Im not saying kill, castrate, or deport them for it, but they vote in a block, they aren’t from Europe, they vote massively different from Whites (because no white ethnicity is as pro Zionist as the Israelis), classify them as non white; they’re Semites, they’re like the Arabs, and that’s ok.
They have PTs.
Killing babies is unacceptable
Tell that to Lindsay Clancy and her supporters.
Once Lindsay Clancy occurred, you do realize that men have stopped caring about women's rights.
Define, "petty". We will see if you can actually do this.
In America, you have the freedom and should have the freedom to do disgusting things. Homosexuality is one of those things.
Anyone who engages in consensual anal sex (gay or straight) has Primate Tendencies (PTs).
Primate tendencies are in 30-44% of the US adult population.
It makes more logical sense to have your penis away from your partner's shit.
But degeneracy should be legal in the US, just highly discouraged, and the age of consent for anal sex should be 21 (because it's really on par with drinking alcohol or smoking tobacco).
