RemyBrown

The following map is a rough estimation (most didn't comment on it) as to whether each state thinks that a woman can have a penis or not.

The kicker is that obviously red = no and blue = yes, but it's asked of the GOVORNERS of each state respectively.

Newsom (governor of a state that is D+20 in 2024 (CA) ) believes women cannot have penises. Healey (governor of a state that is D+25 in 2024 (MA) ) believes that a woman can indeed have a penis.

Because of these very vague points, the democrat candidate's position (because even red states have democrat candidates that just lose most of the time) is the one that is measured.

Red states are where the democrat candidates believe that woman can never, ever have a penis. Blue states are where elected democrat governors do believe that a woman can have a penis.

Yellow (Hawaii) I'm unsure about because it's a D+22 state and their governor is unsure.

But if by 2024 standards, it's more republican than CA, then I assumed it would be red because CA's governor believes only men can have penises and if it's more democrat than MA, then I assumed it's blue and the elected democrats there do believe that a woman can have a penis.

If you ask the majority of the population (even the red people in these blue states), then this map goes full red.

He should do it. Send in 100k American settlers to Greenland and have them vote to join the US. Any left winger that is against this believes that "no human being is illegal" only applies to 3rd world humans; not 1st world American humans.

Any left winger that is against this is inheritely America last and Greenland first and nothing will change my mind on that. I don't support human rights, I support American rights. They are 100% mutually exclusive.

If you're a single woman, then you're almost certainly left wing.

If you're a single man, then you're almost certainly right wing.

1 year ago, right wing men were open to dating left wing women. Left wing women lost interest. Men got acclimated to it. We went to the gym. We studied for exams. All without women's help.

Women were searching for that sole left wing dude that didn't exist because they were already taken.

Now, women went from saying, "If you voted for Trump in 2024, then you're ghosted permanently." to having itchy vaginas saying, "We won't want you if you're conservative, but change your views and THEN we will accept you!"

What conservative men have learned is:

1. We don't care if women are liberal or conservative. Their opinions depend on their mood.
2. Women chose the bear.
3. And yet, women still yearn for that strange man again.

Men learned that women are stupid. Because of that, it's irrelevant if the woman is liberal or conservative, men flat out do not want a woman who is both stupid (unchangeable) and dominant (changable).

Men do not like women having any power because they chose the bear (shows what they would do if they had power).

Men have lost interest in women. They have learned to embrace solitude and to be scared of naggy women. Notice how incel culture died off? Notice how Charlie Kirk's successor is Myron Gains?

Who's more to the right?

Young men who voted in 2024 are very conservative and Gen Alpha men (who can't vote) in 2023 are showing even stronger signs of conservatism. These people (many of them) have never even had sex. They are not hooked by a woman's vagina and the allure of "dating", they view it as expensive, the woman as bratty, and they've lost interest (because they aren't addicted to sex).

Women say, "Don't date us unless you change your conservative ways!" Men say, "So be it."

I saw this left wing woman who was trying to hit on Ben Shapiro. THAT is desperation.

Women want men more than men want women in 2026; and in order for men to desire to date women more, the following has to occur:

1. Women admit, "We were wrong" on strange men vs strange bears.
2. Women do MORE than that. They admit, "We were wrong" on strange men vs strange women.
3. Women assist men in repealing the 19th amendment.
4. The 19th amendment gets repealed.
5. Women obey men. Women submit to men. Men can do fine without them. We go to the gym, we spend time on social media being political. Men are gods to women (except for sex, but men are learning to reduce their sexual desire). Sex is not something a woman gives a man but a man gives a woman (because who provides the sperm?). Men deserve 100% of the ethical leverage, because we know how to use it. Women can't use leverage ethically.
6. Men take care of women.
7. Men get viewed as the superior gender by both men and women alike.
8. Women nurture kids and their husband, traditional values get revived.

Until this occurs, I can see lonely women staying that way for the rest of their vitality. Men have accepted solitude as their default.

Republicans' chances of flipping Minnesota.

Tim Waltz is going MAGA. He called the Somalis "criminals".

He's a Nazi fascist!

Rape is either about:

1. Power
2. Sexual pleasure
3. Combination

If rape is about power, then how could that be the case?

Analogy mode:

You know who has more power than someone with $2 billion? Somebody with $2 billion that lives in a country where it's illegal to be a billionaire, but they get away with it due to government inaction. If you legalize all billionaires, then the actual billionaire loses a lot of power over the, "victims" (the people who made them billionaires).

You know who has more power than a rapist? Somebody who rapes that lives in a country where it's illegal to be a rapist, but they get away with it due to government inaction. If you legalize all rape, then the actual rapist loses a lot of power over the victims (the people who got raped).

Therefore, I would argue that if rape is solely or primarily about power, legalizing rape means you get less rape.

If rape is about sexual pleasure, then right now, rape is a felony. If a few individuals out there commit rape primarily about sexual pleasure despite the risk that they might have their life ruined permanently over it, then that must mean the pleasure achieved from initial sexual contact for the man is extremely strong, it's safe to call it addicting.

So sex is objectively addicting. So is tobacco. Smoking tobacco is only legal if the supplier consents (tobacco store). Sex is only legal if the supplier consents (woman).

Stealing sex is sex rape (robbing sex, a crime comparable to murder). Stealing tobacco is smoke rape (robbing tobacco, a crime that's a misdemeanor).

If smoke rape was charged equally to sex rape (or if all rape was proportionally charged), then nobody would realistically ever commit product rape. Rape and theft would become interchangeable terms.

But sex theft is seen as very bad presumably because people want sex a lot. Only the non-virgins will understand. I don't have too because I'm a virgin.

But sex should be viewed as an addictive thing to do.

People hate Hitler for a genocide. They call him PEAK evil.

But FDR did a genocide and people don't call him, "Peak evil".

Why is that?

Hitler did the genocide after 6 terms. FDR only needed 4 to break.

Power curropts you; it curropts everyone.

Gay men do not murder their unborn children. Liberal women often do.

Stanford prison experiment - Wikipedia. Read about it for context.

The people in charge then went corrupt with power after 6 DAYS of unchecked power. You may hate them for this, but virtually anybody here would do virtually the exact same thing, so you can't judge without possibly being a hypocrite.

Hitler served for 6 terms (I think it was 6 years) before he completed the Holocaust.

If you give virtually anyone in the country unchecked power for 6 terms, then they are going to probably murder way more than 10 million people in the Holocaust (and they will probably do it sooner). They will deny it now (just like I would deny getting tired in a 1600 meter race if I never ran before in my life), but most people don't experience federal governmental power. Probably a good 25% or so of the population if they got unchecked political power would start a nuclear war with North Korea, and that will lead to a death toll much bigger than the Holocaust.

Many wouldn't; but many left wingers would nuke Tel Aviv because of a claim that the Israelis are doing genocide and support genocide. Powerful leaders don't care if they're being hypocritical; why would they? If you play clash of clans, you would have soldiers die for your loot. Now, they aren't real people, but to politicians, real people become equally expendable as hose cartoon soldiers. Many left wingers would murder every Trump supporter because they would be viewed as Nazis and Nazis deserve death (75 million Trump supporters in the country).

5 years ago, being pro Hitler was taboo.

Today, it's being edgy.

And as of now, I kind of see the appeal because of the Stamford Prisoner experiments. People go massively corrupt with power. They say Hitler murdered 10 million people, I'm like, "Only 10 million? I know many people that would murder way more."

I think this take is fairly moderate.

Voting rights and responsibilities should be restricted to those that underwent testosterone induced puberty.

Why doesn't estrogen get equal status? It's because testosterone makes people physically stronger and estrogen does not.

Why is this relevant? It's because being physically stronger means men have to think more logically than woman and act less on their emotions. If a woman punches someone, then they are weak, so nobody cares. If a man punches someone, then it's much more serious. A man punching another man as hard as he can hurts more than a woman punching another woman as hard as she can. Think about that.

When your punches have the power to hospitalize, you are told, "Do NOT think emotionally. Think logically." Women can be told this, but this is only effective on the girls in school; adult women won't listen; they aren't obliged too and they are too stuck in their ways. Men have ALWAYS been told to control their emotions, because it's disaster if they don't.

Men live harder lives than women and they have thought of things more intensely because of testosterone, so voting should be restricted to those that underwent testosterone puberty.

If somebody wants to call me a Lesult over it, then it will probably be ignored (and I think they are trying so hard for the chance to rub an internet woman's feet that it's simping behavior).

"Are women with IUDs murderers?"

Yes; and they should be tried like 4th degree murderers (which means community service) along with the fuckboy that got the pregnant.

Ban abortion federally. A zygote's life matters more than 9 months of woman's pain and if you don't believe that a zygote is a human, then any other time you decide it's a human is arbitrary, so ban abortion at conception.

If it's misogynist to say that, then maybe misogyny is good after all? If people want to call me an incel or any negative legal label, then they should understand it means nothing anymore.

Ban abortion federally and outlaw IUDs.

Charlie Kirk was the moderate; he died, and now you got 160 million radicals. Young dudes are going even more conservative than previously. And the leverage of sex that women have is fading away because dudes are becoming more religious and waiting until marriage. They go to the gym.

It's too vague.

What counts as cruel and unusual to some isn't that way to others.

Be more specific.

Leave all penalties up to the municipalities via direct ballot initiative.

We hate Trump supporters because they support a rapist (but not Catholic Church supporters even though they support a rapist organization).

Make it make sense.

Be consistent. Hate neither.

I don't care if someone supports a rapist named Trump and is MAGA or someone that supports the rapists in the Vatican (aka, I don't care if someone is Catholic).

Trans rights vs 1st amendment rights.

Should someone be private sector disassociated with for calling Dawn Marie a man? No.

This is why 1st amendment rights matter more than trans rights, and virtually every cisgender person (of all races, genders, and sexual orientations) agrees with this.

There is much racial and gender diversity in transphobia. Even the LGB people agree with it so much that they got independence from the T's:

‘It’s about time!’ LGB International officially breaking up with TQ.

And to any T's that want the LGB to stick around, James Charles and all of his pedophilia reflects poorly on the Ts while you Ts are united with the LGBs. James Charle's negative reputation doesn't impact the Ts if the Ts aren't with the LGBs.

The rainbows and the mirrors should say duces to each other.

Transwomen: Stick up for women! Fuck Ben Shapiro!

Ben Shapiro: You are men, you committing suicide is horrible, you need to get therapy help.

Cis women: GET OUT OF MY BATHROOM YOU PERVY PEDOPHILLE FREAK!!!! WE ARE WOMEN!!! YOU'RE a MENTALLY ILL MAN!!!!

Transwomen should ditch advocating for ciswomen who think they're pedophiles more strongly because transwomen want to be in women's bathrooms.

Any cis woman who is clocked can say, "I have had or do have the ability to get pregnant" and it's something that transwomen will never be able to say.

Gay men don't get abortions. Liberal women do.

A zygote's life matters more than 9 months of women's stomach inconvenience. If this is misogyny, then we need more of it!

If someone calls me a misogynist or any other insult, then it doesn't matter. The truth is the truth even if it's worded poorly.

The left: Healthcare is a human right! Love your neighbor!

Me: Healthcare for Zionists! Israel has free healthcare!

The left: Never mind; free healthcare is racist!

If you think this is a strawman, then I literally had a far left ex friend that disassociated with me because I defended desalination plants (she claimed they were racist because Israel did them). I can assume many agree with her.

Yes; the left is that stupid!

Men in 2024 (largely) voted for Trump (even the Latino and Asian ones).

Women HATE this (and they will never forgive you no matter how many times you vote blue for the rest of your life). Here's why:

1. If right wing men start denouncing Trump en masse, then it's not because they are becoming Harris supporters; it's because they are becoming America First supporters (Nick Fuentes, Myron Gains, Ye West, etc). They are never going to love AOC and they will never become transgender activists.
2. If men start voting massively blue in every single election from here on out for the rest of their lives, then women will interpret that as, "Oh; he's lying about his politics so he can degrade me via sex". MAGA men in 2024 made their decision (and even though I get angry at women over man vs bear, you bet your ass I did NOT vote for the "Haitians are eating the pets" guy). Trump won his 2nd term in 2024; a time that's over 1 year ago. If a man voted for Trump in 2024, then NOTHING can undo what they did in 2024. NOTHING. Women know that, and they will find MAGA men permanently disgusting. And the MAGA women already got boyfriends, so if you are a man who voted for Trump in 2024, then you should assume that you will be single for the rest of your life. You will be desperate, women will know that, they will be sadistic to you the more time you spend on dating apps. From the woman's perspective, you voting for Trump in a time that you will never be able to take back means you aren't empathetic to her, so she's going to reciprocate that with a permanent cock block. It may come off as "eye for an eye" (which sounds conservative and hypocritical for a leftist) but once they realize Trump is a hypocrite and MAGA voting dudes in 2024 have permanently tied their fate to Trump, the women simply won't care that they're being hypocritical.
3. Therefore, I would recommend to dudes that voted for Trump in 2024; go to the gym, get your physical urges out from lifting weights and cardio, because a woman's vagina is going to be off limits for you for the rest of your life. You will never get married. You will never have kids. All vaginas are history to you and will be for the rest of your celibate life if you are already single right now. But you don't need sex to survive, so consider this to be a briefing rather than a threat. Enjoy being single, because women are fine with being single. MAGA voting Men will need to adjust to their single lifetime.
4. What I'm questioning is whether or not Trump will legalize rape (I'm not agreeing with legalizing rape), but whether or not Trump will legalize rape to help his supporters legally be able to get sex without consent. I think it's a possibility that he would do it. He may ban women from working so they HAVE to depend on a man to survive so they can't just poison him. I'm not agreeing with this hypothetical law; I'm predicting it.

It literally means, "Win, victory".

If there is no winning over the left, then the right should simply be happy that they are in the majority in the United States. You don't need 100% to agree with you; just a majority. Some people can't be changed and this should be accepted.

The left has lost their open mindedness. I wonder why.

I was banned for a month. I reluctantly accepted it. I wanted to see how busy the site would be without me.

This website is only 5 months old. I did not lose a single position in the standings for posts, comments, likes, or mentions to the best of my knowledge (when I was banned for a month, so I couldn't post).

This led me to believe what seems to be obvious; this past month politically (whether left or right wing) has really tired everyone out. Nobody wants to talk anymore about politics. I think I speak for everyone regardless of political views when I say everyone is exhausted of talking about their opinions.

And think about how everyone got so engaged with politics. It was Trump (a self-proclaimed macho dude who gave a blowjob to Bill Clinton). If our POTUS in 2016 was John Kasich, then nobody would care. Trump made politics a business; but he has done several things that even MAGA people don't like him for, he's gotten very old, everyone knows he's going to die soon, the left no longer is pro DEI (which made the left the left to begin with). Our political voices are saying, "Kill Charlie Kirk", "Kill Democrats", and normal people are very checked out I think.

America had it's political decade (2015-2025). It will be fun to teach to children in history class.

Trump ran his show; political views were contingent on your view of Trump. You either thought he was an eccentric businessman who told it like it is or a bombastic child rapist who lies with every breath he uses. John Kasich would have never caused a storm like this. But when Trump dies, nobody will care about anyone's political opinions anymore. And everyone knows he will be in office for 3 years more no matter what he does (unless he dies early), and the left has decided that debating Trump supporters isn't worth it anymore. They even criticize Dean Withers. From the MAGA perspective, they are feeling happy, maybe even adrenalized.

But when I was saying things here that many people thought were misogynistic, it kept people engaged. When I left for a month, everyone saw how dead this site was (politically).

Maybe it's better for us if we all left this site for good, just to take a break.

The GOP has exposed their racism by calling for Vivek to be deported to India for being Indian.

Immigrants are usually Latino or Asian. Many Latinos are White. The White Latinos will probably continue to vote red, but darker Latinos are stuck in the blue camp probably indefinitely, so much so that if the GOP runs a candidate that says, "I'm not racist", then the Latino conservatives would vote for them, but the white conservatives won't (think of JD Vance, who married an Indian wife and has 2 brown children).

The GOP has to decide whether to be racist or capitalist. If they select the former option, then they alienate the minority conservatives; if they select the ladder, then they alienate the white conservatives. Because the reality is, although the GOP in 2016 was very white, there is a danger to annexing a group of people within your party; you have to accommodate their needs in a way that you just couldn't do if they are with a different party.

You can't say, "Transwomen are men" and then call Blaire White a woman because she's MAGA (and you can't refer to Blaire as she/her because she/her pronouns are for women). You can't say, "Deport anchor babies" and be fine with Vivek. The GOP can't be a united party with Cadence Owens (black anti semite woman), Ben Shapiro (Jew), Nick Fuentes (white nationalist anti semite), Myron Gains (black guy who also wants to take away women's right to vote) and MTG (anti semite anti abortion feminist). The GOP needs to decide which groups to keep and which groups to expel.

The truth is people don't vote on the economy; they vote on social issues (which are Blacks, Dark Immigrants, Gays, Trans, and women). That's why if there is a Dark immigrant who is a lesbian transwomen, then they could have billions of dollars or they could be broke, they are voting blue.

Nick Fuentes would vote for Newsom over JD Vance because Newsom has a white family. And Newsom has a very Trumpian vibe to him (even though he's a democrat). I like Newsom's Trumpian vibe. Race isn't the issue for me.

But LGBT activists who want solidarity should realize that yes, these brown people voted blue in 2025, but they still believe that TW are men and that will not realistically change, so if a democrat wins office and they say TW are men, then the minorities won't consider that to be a deal breaker, but they won't agree with them.

The GOP might go extinct due to racism, and then the 2 parties would be the TERFs and the LGBT party. Minorities are left wing on every issue except LGBT and even young white dudes are usually like that too (but the urban white guys don't want the deportations like the rural ones do, but there is mild but common anti semetism in both).

Anti semetism doesn't even mean wanting the Jews dead, it could mean not liking Jews while also not wanting to kill them. Saying, "Jews run the media" is anti semetism even if you wouldn't kill them for running the media.

America was founded on equality (ideological equality, meaning facsism and human rights were on an equal playing field). Like, the founders owned slaves.

So if you want to be the American value for equality, then you have to on a personal level hold facsists equally to supporters of human rights.

The most important (first) amendment protects freedom of speech, not freedom of sex.

Human rights = Leftism, Fascism = Rightism.

75% of men would agree to have sex with a random woman if it's consensual. 0% of women reciprocate.

Men are in charge of the law in our country, and rape is a very bad felony.

Men view strange women as better than goddesses (when was the last time you saw a man take a statue of Athena out for a date?), women view men as worse than bears.

If women had as much political power as men do with their current brains, then they would make men 2nd class citizens. Men don't do that because they have self awareness.

Am I advocating for legalizing rape? No; but plenty of people are on this website that has the left/right fairly equally balanced.

I want the men in charge of the law in the country to operate with gender fairness (but also in their own interests). There will be a conflict of these values, legalizing rape would be in men's best interests, but it would violate gender fairness too much, so I wouldn't legalize rape.

But I would do things like:

1. Make pre-nups and post-nups mandatory (unless you opt out). If women think this is harmful to women, then alright, but it's beneficial to men, and it's better, so I'd want to do that. If the woman tries to opt out, then the wedding would be illegal due to female exploitation.
2. Ban women from the military if they do not meet the same physical requirements of men.
3. All dating apps would be outlawed. The federal government would buy out 100% of the stock from all American dating apps (and because the business model is failing, they won't move to China, they will just accept the stock purchasing). This is bad for women because it destroys their ego, but it's good for men (and it's the moral thing to do).
4. You should be required to do a minimum of 30 pushups in one sitting to be able to vote. A healthy body creates a healthy mind. I can do 53 pushups in one sitting, so I'm fine. The majority of men should not be able to vote and virtually no woman should be able to vote because how can you be mentally strong if you can't even discipline yourself to be able to do 30 pushups in one sitting? The majority of people don't even have to think about politics anymore; the women can walk the dogs (and lets be honest, for the vast majority of women and the majority of men; politics is too stressful to think about especially when you think of the other party, no vote means you don't have to think about it). This means politicians have to be more logical.
5. Get rid of useless degrees (any political or human rights major, even Polysci). Human rights is horrible because it is nothing more than a very powerful marketing term for gullible people, the overwhelming majority of whom are women, rainbows, and Irish White "men" and anyone Canadian (unless they are the minority in Canada that identifies as an American).
6. Any woman that said they prefer the bear over the unknown dude on the internet will have their account banned over hate speech. They are saying men don't deserve human rights. DOE KIG speech would be Disparagement or Execution of a Known Innocent Group. Saying a man is worse than a bear is Disparagement. Saying you think Kirk rightfully had it coming would be Execution of a known innocent group. Saying, "I believe Transwomen are women" after Nov 10 2025 in public would mean you should get punched with the one exception of those that say, "I non-violently believe Transwomen are women". The right being subject to the equal and opposite is optional because they didn't celebrate or say Dylan Mulvaney had it coming for a bud light can; they merely boycotted Bud Light. I didn't even agree with the Bud light protest, but I'm non-violent about my TWAW belief, so I can (and should) be treated as one of the good ones. Being a pick me ally kicks ass! Dean Withers is a pick me liberal. The non-pick me left wingers disassociate with everyone with one right wing opinion because it gives fascists credit.

Context: There are different types of rape.

What types of rape would you execute someone for and which types would you legalize?

I would argue legalizing all rape is better than banning all rape if rape is a spectrum, which includes even the most consensual form of sex counts as rape.

The former means women get raped more often and they get used to it. The ladder means humanity DIES off unless artificial wombs come (which is uncertain).

Im trying not to defend rape, but if rape is on a spectrum, then even consensual sex is rape (it’s just the least rapey rape that’s out there).

1. Sex without consent. This is mentally traumatizing to a woman. It should be illegal.
2. Saying a political opinion that also gives many people similar amounts of trauma. This is just free speech and should be legal unless the 1st amendment gets repealed, the US adopts communism, and we admit China was correct on whether free speech is good or bad.

You know why I say that saying certain opinions counts as verbal rape?

Here is a common example (warning: This is graphic to many):

The left believes that free speech is fine but hate speech is not fine. Well, all right wing opinions are hate speech to the left once they think about what those right encompass. Transphobia (believing XY is male and XX is female with no exceptions) is hate speech.

Being anti Black Lives Matter is hate speech (it’s racist).

Being anti abortion choice while not wanting to get a vasectomy because, “your body your choice” is hate speech; it’s mysogony.

Being pro nuclear energy is racist hate speech because the waste gets put in Native American religious sites.

Being pro low taxes is classist hate speech because it means cutting government spending which causes more non Hispanic black children to suffer due to worse schools.

All republican and right wing speech is going to be inherently xenophobic by its very nature. If you don’t want to hear right wing opinions (aka verbal rape), then don’t share your opinions to anybody. Don’t have political clubs (as dealing with the verbal rape of right wingers is inevitable), don’t post your opinion to social media (because the inevitable verbal rape of right wing speech will traumatize you).

Enjoy yoga; enjoy meditation. Politics isn’t for you because it exposes you to verbal rape. So therefore, don’t vote.

I hate group sex, so I don’t go to an orgy. Politics is a group activity. If verbal rape traumatizes you, then don’t attend the ballot box.

I’m of the opinion that verbal rape should be legal because it’s just an uncomfortable right winger’s opinion that traumatizes left wingers.

Democrat politician: Vote for ME to make life more affordable.

Reality: If they win, then they spend their term relaxing.

Republican politician: Vote for ME to make life more affordable.

Reality: If they win, then they spend their term relaxing.

Me: People don't vote D or R based on the economy. They vote on social issues. If Trump modified economic policy, then nobody will care. Numbers are boring. If Trump commented on BLM, Gaza, Transgenderism, or some social issue, only THEN do people care about what he said (whether it's left or right wing).

Look at how Brexit occurred. Was it fiscal policy that caused Brexit? No; otherwise it would have occurred way before. People don't notice their net worths drop as a result of taxes. 

Now, what people in the UK DO notice is Muslims, and the left wingers think the Muslims bring diversity while the right thinks they are invaders that are bringing in Shriaiah law.

But nobody votes on the economy/cost of living (every politician will say they want to reduce the cost of living and then not do much about it). They vote on social issues, things that catch their eye.

If you win at a game: Happiness, respect.

If you win at sex (player): Happiness, respect.

If you don't play the game: Indifference.

If you don't play at sex (abstinence): Indifference.

If you cheat at the game: No legal penalty.

If you cheat at sex (rape): Very bad felony.

Lesson: Sex is not a game. Otherwise raping a woman would be like cheating at BlackJack.

They are biological adults but identify as children and want to be treated as children.

If you tell them, "grow up", then they get defensive. Men don't do that.

Therefore, help them with their unofficial identity of identifying as 17 year old girls and treat them as such (no voting rights, but you can fuck them with consent and you can have them do chores like a child).

If women don't like this, then grow up and act like an adult.

Women can get all the Disney rides that their bf will let them go on for the rest of their lives if they agree to abandon the responsibility of selecting a political candidate that requires hours of studying and only gives you 15 minutes of freedom at your local polling station to vote every 4 years or so.

It sounds like a good deal for anyone that is trans-age (25 years old but identifies as 17).