That's not entirely accurate.
t = 0 does not mean no time. The change of t = 0 means no time.
almost no physics equation references duration of time without delta in the equation. it's easy to be confused if you haven't studied delta equations.
That's not entirely accurate.
t = 0 does not mean no time. The change of t = 0 means no time.
almost no physics equation references duration of time without delta in the equation. it's easy to be confused if you haven't studied delta equations.
It's not just the eyes, your brain has a synapse time, your nerves have a reaction time, your muscles have a reaction time. It all adds up.
Correct. We know, on a galactic scale, that we can be observing a star that is actually going supernova now, and we won't know it happened for many years.
On a micro scale, it just means our consciousness can never exist in, or register, the present state of the actual world.
Heisenberg noted the act of observation changes the nature of observed particles, but there's 2 things going on at the same time that make this true. You can think of the act of observation analogous to active sonar pinging, but if the pinging were instant, there would be no change observed in the particle, even though the particle is definitely altered. But... Because there's a time delay, it absolutely makes a difference between the observed state and the actual state of a particle, which makes true observation of the present state of a particle impossible.
If you are measuring change, you need two reference points, wouldn't T=0 just represent "no time".
absolutely not, the number line extends infinitely in both directions; it does not end at zero.
zero is a common mathematical point indicating present time. You took physics in high school, right?
nearly all the textbook primers use this standard for the introduction into motion equations.
If you are measuring a change, you need a reference point, as in t = 0
Would you say Heisenberg's principle dictates that all evidence must exist in the past and never in the present?
Simply put, the act of observing itself consumes some measure of time that makes it impossible to observe evidence at t=0?
You fit right in with the tribe of violence.
And Kamala had ample opportunity to separate herself from party failures. The in-the-pocket show "The View" practically begged on hands and knees to slam dunk the ball, and she flubbed. Did she just not get the memo?
Go figure, but I choose to control the medium rather than let the medium control me.
Ironic considering you, but perhaps this is a goal in progress. In that case, well wishes and support.
You are criticising Spanberger a bit too much.
Of course, the Trump tribe wants to paint her as radically far-left, but this article proves she isn't nearly as radical as Hakeem Jeffries:
I guess that's why the assassin got killed on the White House lawn, he was just following team rules.
Which it isn't.
Oh, it most certainly is. Cuba is a great example of when the non - working wolves take over "democratically"
It's certainly not natural.
It's the reason why the opposite of anarchy never prevails. Free isn't freedom
and like it or not society always naturally divides into the workers and the management.
No, it doesn't, at least not in 2026.
In 2026, society is artificially divided between the producing and working sheep and the non-working and non-producing wolves, voting for the non-producing government to shear every sheep for "equality".
Which in essence is no different to a private organisation controlling the supply of goods
That's also a contradiction. Authoritative bodies control the supply of production. Private organizations control the production of supplies.
Every one of New York's "government-owned grocery stores" will have the shelves stocked through force and fear. The government has not, and will never be, a producer of anything but fear and control. The government has never been a true producer of wealth or goods. Its primary instruments are authority, enforcement, and control.
Yep, that's going to be the future of New York.
equality and freedom
This is the actual contradiction, because USA never limits equality to the application of authority.
There's nothing "not communist" about a government-owned supermarket.
Which is a somewhat nicer variation on the same theme of hierarchical order.
Yes, a nicer sounding form of oppression and lack of personal liberty.
any more racially pure than the UK
Cultural tribalism in 2026 doesn't give a flying fuck about social skin constructs.
Such is the American psyche...Continually sold the unachievable dream
The Chinese don't even have a government as ambitious as New York communism.
Government-owned grocery stores, expanded public/social housing through a government development authority, publicly funded universal childcare expansion, free city bus expansion through subsidies, support for public banking, greater public ownership/control of utilities and healthcare, and broader city-directed economic intervention in housing and essential services.
Lmao @ "land of the free"
They took the word free and corrupted it beyond all rationale.
That's what really happened to the American Dream
There are zero liberals left in America. American culture slowly took the phrase "Freedom isn't Free" and reversed it to;
"Free isn't Freedom"
and of course a large proportion of Americans, and not just white European Americans are too dim witted to understand.
That is certainly true. When you enter the country illegally, on the premise that you can sacrifice every last shred of personal liberty for welfare, you are probably too dim-witted to know it's an unsustainable system.
I don't know why the UK even voted for Brexit when they just allowed anyone from all over the globe to establish foreign tribes in your country anyway.
Wasn't Brexit supposed to give your country the authority to preserve its culture and country? Seems like a waste.
Plus that basket of deplorables comment by hillary really was uncalled for. It hurt the feelings of trumps base. and was too toxic compared to our dear leaders clean record on the point of insults
Yah, a basket of communists is a far worse insult.
Mark Cuban...
Sadly, he is MAGA
who believe in democracy
Good luck destroying your Constitution to create a democracy. It will be fun to see the USA destroy itself with popular whim rule as they vote in tyranny.
James Madison and Alexander Hamilton and Jefferson, who founded American liberalism, will certainly approve.
Are there no suitably intelligent articulate B Shitting Democrats available?...With the available funds of course.
Nearly all of the leading hopefuls are highly educated individuals. The problem isn't the people, it's the content matter.
Selling far-left communism in America is hard, no matter how intelligent you are.
That was another quick concession.
Of course, you won't say a thing about it. You worship government intervention in all things.
Speaking ill of a benevolent government that cares about the welfare of the people borders on blasphemy.
It's just weaker fascists fighting for power from the stronger fascists. That's all.
That ideological war was lost long ago.
Large modern states, regardless of branding, naturally accumulate administrative power, economic influence, national mythology, and behavioral control.
It's inevitable that liberalism would die. People forget what it's like to be free.
As I said, there are no liberals left in your country. They have all been converted to accept government control over everything.
Cool! Your country actually needs a 1776-style revolt since it's knee deep in fascism right now.
There are no liberals left in your country to feed the tree of liberty with their blood, though.
the 1776 project?
A market “correction” is the natural result of everyone suddenly pulling back on their spending. This is economics 101, you would know it if you understood the first thing about it.
The banks must pay you well to support the fascist bailouts to those private sectors.
Such "kindness" from your sacred government overlords.
It's okay, your benevolent government that cares about the welfare of the people will just bail out the banks when consumers voluntarily lower their demand for loans by consuming less. No market correction required when economic fascists are in charge of the private banking industry...