Shoresy

Obviously, the solution to this problem is to assassinate or attempt to assassinate some leftoids. Then nobody will complain.

That's because the drugs needed to end your own life are legal and free in the UK and Canada.

Japan has the fewest guns per capita...yet...

So don't change anything, excuse everything, and hope for the best?

Some plan.

Is this a manifesto?

Your OP suggests anyone who disagrees with you is a "gun-nut."

You are basically begging people who disagree to define you as a "gun-ban-nut" instead of listening.

This is just going to drown out any logical data or arguments.

As a manifesto, this can work.

As a discussion, it's DOA.

A Japan-style gun ban would work in America only if America radically transforms itself into a homogenous society like Japan currently is, where nobody questions the intent of another random person or their culture.

Objectively false due to 2 elections.

The opposite of what you said is objectively true.

Sure, Trump basically wrote the manifesto of the assassin, and not evil people manufacturing outrage.

I heard those same manufacturers of hate saying Pretti and Good were assassinated by Trump's ICE for exercising their 1st amendment.

By that logic, El Trumpo is wrongly being a king for arresting the assassin who was peacefully using a gun for "free speech."

At least Canadians and the UK have access to the drugs that make them not care about outrage, manufactured or not.

The Trump echo chamber is all about divisiveness, manufactured outrage, and violence,

So Trump is basically SPLC.

Trump was "registered" as a Democrat for a long time, too.

Didn't make him a radical, or a "real Democrat."

But I've vaguely heard that a number of people were pretty upset about...

I get that, and Germans were upset about a lot of things the Jews said. Doesn't mean we encourage or excuse that kind of rhetoric.

Or say something as outrageous as "some" victims should be blamed.

The 1st amendment only protects a society of decency.

Not a society of assassins. Assassins and their accomplices with assassin rhetoric shouldn't be excused or protected.

Maybe someone 'should blame the victim 'some.

I agree, if Trump called himself "worse than Hitler" then you could certainly blame him for radicalizing people and justifying assassinations.

But he NEVER did that. Did he?

The people who DID radicalize assassins with that kind of political rhetoric were like the SS Officers. They had clean hands by making subordinates do the dirty work.

Thankfully, the Nuremberg trials didn't have free speech laws to protect those who radicalized people to kill the Jews with extreme rhetoric.

Or you could stick to your guns and say that "some" of the Jews were asking for that political rhetoric from SS officers.

If political assassinations are justified some of the time, they can eventually be justified all of the time at some point.

For some people in the old west, 'spitting was reason enough for 'some people to shoot another.

. . . Or even in some of the worse places in the world today.

Maybe we should remove the people who think political assassinations for spitting, or close to those reasons, from the USA before America becomes like an African country?

Doesn't mean I think it's justified,

Maybe we shouldn't say "Trump caused it" then. Victim blaming gets lots of social media clicks, but it's not good for society.

I have never heard Trump call himself "worse than Hitler..." and people who carry out assassinations would certainly use that as a "justification."

Well, people attempting to assassinate Hitler, were justified in my view.

One, The crime of the Holocaust.

Two, His incompetence in war.

I've not said anyone yet has been 'justified in attempting to assassinate Trump.

I just think it's been 'Trumps actions, that have fueled some people's hatred of him, 'more than anyone else's words.

Ok, those are some good examples of the words and actions of a 137-year-old dead man's actions justifying assassination.

How about the 79 year old current resident of the White House?

What are his words and actions that warrant assassination?

You also claim that Democrat words do not justify assassinations, yet many Democrats have the opinion that Trump is worse than Hitler.

I think it's 'Trumps actions and words, not words from Democrats that have caused many of the assassination attempts.

Where is that idea coming from exactly to justify political assassinations? I have never heard Trump call himself "worse than Hitler..."

What actions and words exactly justifies assassinations?

Really curious to hear this one.

Preferably, some examples from your observations alone, and not copied and pasted from a Democrat party or Iranian propaganda outlet.

Very curious about this.

Amazing talent

It's far worse than that.

All the "blue no matter who" crowd who excused the monumental failures during 2009–2010

Are DIRECTLY responsible for the current president resident.

You don't blame a dog for getting free and biting all the kids in the street; you blame the owner who opened up the gate and set it loose through negligence.

So no excuses. Congratulations.

Not one sided abuse.

Hopefully not 2 sided abuse!

It is shocking because you have no excuses for this:

1937–1939 (FDR era)

1965–1967 (LBJ era)

2009–2010 (Obama era)

But of course, a partisan hack is gonna hack. It's in the blood.

Here you go: let's see all the excuses for 2009–2010:

1) Didn’t pass a simpler, broadly popular healthcare option

Skipped a clear public option/Medicare buy-in in favor of private industry subsidization.

2) Didn’t prosecute top Wall Street figures after the fiscal crash

Reinforced the “elites aren’t held accountable” narrative.

3) Didn’t deliver strong, visible foreclosure relief

Millions lost homes while banks stabilized.

4) Didn’t produce a fast, felt recovery for working-class voters

Macro economy did improve, but many communities didn’t feel it.

5) Didn’t enact meaningful anti-corruption / lobbying reforms

“Revolving door” and influence concerns stayed intact.

6) Didn’t pass comprehensive immigration reform during the 2009-2010 window

Left a vacuum that later hardened into a flashpoint and paved the way for fatso Trump with the big mouth.

7) Didn’t pivot on trade to address deindustrialization concerns

Left skepticism about globalization unaddressed, did nothing to stop industry from offshoring and gutting out communities.

8) Didn’t structurally break up “too big to fail” banks

Regulated them, but didn’t shrink or punish them, the trust gap remained.

9) Didn’t reform the filibuster when they had leverage

Set up years of gridlock so the government looks ineffective and full of excuses.

10) Didn’t end gerrymandering (despite rhetoric about fixing the system)

No federal change to map-drawing rules, so all those power consolidation incentives and distrust with the system carried forward.

I'd be shocked, too, while trying to come up with a comprehensive list of excuses for my cult.

1937–1939 (FDR era)

1965–1967 (LBJ era)

2009–2010 (Obama era)

All talk. Your narrative can be summed up in one word: "excuses."

1937–1939 (FDR era)

1965–1967 (LBJ era)

2009–2010 (Obama era)

All talk.

And specifically, the 2009 fuckup probably sowed the seeds for your present moron-in-chief.

What's the point of "Democrats support this" if they never actually did anything for the past 100 years?

All talk.

but from what I’ve observed, it’s both parties, not just the Democrats. 

I'm just noticing that states didn't do this to "get Obama"

But sure, Texas did recently change a lot of the previous districting.

I could be wrong, though. Either side will care about saving "our democracy" as long as they get to define the word "our."

Universal suffrage was a mistake.

Well, it did make election security incredibly difficult to implement when the focus is on voter accessibility over voter verification.

I heard a saying recently:

The demand for racism is far, far greater than the supply of racism today.

It's really no different from a religious figure convincing the flock that "the end is nigh" as the collection baskets fill.

Not to equate racism with religion.... but if it walks and sounds like a duck....

grifters gonna grift.

What do you think about the possible disenfranchisement of about 3.1 million people in Virginia due to the recent gerrymandering?

Is that a sacrifice worth to "get Trump?"

I guess when Democrats say "our democracy," they really do mean the "our" part....

Trump was the first female US president. Neither were draft eligible.

Sadly, those who cannot never predicted those who can to produce teaching machines.