The war has really exposed the climate alarmist hypocrites. That's at least one good thing.
Not one alarmist has come out in support of the destruction of oil. Even Greta condemned the destruction of oil.
The war has really exposed the climate alarmist hypocrites. That's at least one good thing.
Not one alarmist has come out in support of the destruction of oil. Even Greta condemned the destruction of oil.
I feel lucky, if my Mom told me I could pick my gender when I was 6, I probably would have gone on a murder spree at some point in my life.
whether It's classifiable as mental illness or just socio-psychological evolution is open for discussion
It's mostly both of these. Chicken and egg stuff.
When has the human race ever been wholly peaceful.
The extinct parts of the human race are at peace, resting of course. Since when has entropy ever been described as peaceful? Existing in an entropic world requires struggle and tension.
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
As I always say...Procreational sex and recreational sex are two different things that are inextricably linked by the human condition.
We already struggle enough as a society to permit individual euthanasia. The euthanasia of a species with below replacement levels seems a tad spicier with harsh long-term consequences.
but the bottom line is
Nice word choice.
Indeed.
The biological SSD creates the illusion of existence.
I don't particularly think it is useful to lump holocaust skeptics in with outright holocaust deniers.
What's the driving issue silencing those who seem to think the evidence points to 5 or maybe 7 million killed rather than the generally accepted number 6 million?
I was talking about a discussion on the "reliability of the evidence" which you were saying shouldn't be had/isn't being had when Holocaust denial is banned.
Usually, when discussion is banned, it's for a reason from those whose interests align with banning discussion. See "Climate Deniers."
The fact that you glossed over the word "false" and replaced it with your own word "narrative" shows you remain predictable and boring.
No one's pushing narratives onto trans people
Agree to disagree on this.
people who go on HRT....
Why is that even being pushed as a choice? Don't bother, I know what your response is already. A good-faith discussion would be neither predictable nor boring.
Also, something nobody EVER talks about, is that just because you feel like you don't belong in the body you were born in, it doesn't mean you will necessarily belong in exactly only one other alternative body. That's a false dichotomy that has caused immeasurable suffering. And I suspect you already know who has the most to gain from pushing that.
Sure, and cats are entertained by a laser pointer. Your point?
Personally, I find cats boring.
Especially the circus cats.
You validated the "boring" claim at the end of the OP.
No, you validated the OP.
Thank you for validating the OP with the predicted response. So much for free will.
Centuries of philosophical debate ended with a meme reply.
It's ironic that the feminist movement was crushed into the ground, not by men, but by determined women who destroyed the concept of biological sexes. If there is no female, there is no feminism.
Feminism is currently facing an internal conflict over whether it should be grounded in biological sex or gender identity, and that unresolved tension is radically reshaping the past progress of feminism, which traditionally provided protected, privileged spaces for biological women. When everyone can identify as a protected class, there are no specific rights for protected classes.
I think he means conversations that are predictable are the norm now. People used to actually use this site for growth and change, and not as a megaphone. The site is now dominated with oversimplifications of everything and more parroting than questions. The hallmark of low thought.
No wonder those catladies of culture empathize with trans kids. They are both headed to the same fate.
That's a great thing. Now foreign countries will have to buy USA crap for a change. And American Oil workers get paid well for it.
Who needs minimum wage when you can get the maximum wage simply for not being a traitor?
"There are but two parties now: traitors and patriots. And I want hereafter to be ranked with the latter and, I trust, the stronger party." - Ulysses S. Grant
More oil jobs for USA citizens. Worth.
Greta says oil is evil anyway, the messiah has spoken.
More USA customers.
Greta says oil is evil anyway, the messiah has spoken.
Iran had TDS, look what happened to them
Sure, voting guidelines do mostly fix that problem, but why not have a prophylactic approach? What are the upsides for a 6-month voting window?
Should is the operative word. Most people never see artistic creations within the context of the corresponding zeitgeist of their creation.
It's sadly a very self-centered view, and thus extremely biased and unfair to the original content creator. If cancel culture taught us nothing, it's that blanket judgements out of temporal norms usually manufacture ill intentions and warped understandings.
The same applies to debates about current events: when people vote on a debate six months later, they inevitably will evaluate the arguments using hindsight and information that the debaters obviously did not have when the debate occurred. This creates outcome bias, where voters reward whoever happened to align with what later proved true rather than who made the strongest argument given the information available at the time, making the evaluation unfair to the participants who were reasoning within the limits of the information of the moment.
Imagine if Canada was bombed by Koreans and they killed 10 of your leaders.
If those 10 leaders were killing thousands of us for wanting freedom, eyes would be a lot drier than you think.
It's a hypothetical, just like it's a hypothetical that the Iranian people will certainly and willingly return to Sharia hell.
A lot of these debates are written with contemporary considerations that often change over months. For example, a debate on the Iran war will be written today when there is uncertainty, but if you allow votes 5 months out from when the debate was made, and if the IRGC was deposed by its own people by that time, then the votes will be extremely biased.
Rights, moral or otherwise, are only as valid as the force behind them. The right to own a nuke is self-sustaining.
Your 2nd amendment is also a self-sustaining right.
America's 1st Amendment is sustained by the 2nd amendment.
What did chimps do to deserve such a slander? Goodall would have been furious at you.
Well, he definitely wasn't a chimp according to Goodall.
To be fair, Goodall hated most humans. Understandably.
She had HDS.
