Shoresy

Incorrect

Thank you for your insightful projection. I feel like I have a better understanding of why you Americans behave as you do. It's not as much of a mystery.

I appreciate your honesty in explaining it all to me.

Trump called for retribution for Kirk, and one of his followers obliged him, and yep, Trump's fascist reign of terror and violence is definitely scary.

I don't really care what dehumanizing label you want to slap on yourself or others. What you wrote looks no different than any other group resorting to violence against groups they hate. The fact that doesn't faze you is way scarier than any American propaganda you have to spread. This sentiment goes way back, weeks ago when you and doubleR and flrw were celebrating the death of Kirk with zero shame. If that is what you think America should be proud of, then it's no longer the America I ever read about. The America I read about was way more compassionate to fellow countrymen. I thought you guys learned to move away from things like slavery and civil war. Seems like you are determined to get back to the internal violence of the 1800's sadly. You can call it retribution or justice all you want, but once you start celebrating political killings, you’re not defending anything, you’re tearing apart your own country. All your talk about American pride or American shame is just babble at that point.

Oh, and devoting your entire life around one man and filling your life with hate and vitriol, inventing new dehumanizing words daily to feed your insatiable hate for your fellow man, is somehow "serious"

I see very little difference between political terrorists on both sides and your mindset. That's what it looks like from up here. You may not know anything about our NDP party, but you soon will.

Did H.L. also predict left-wing terrorism?

He could raise the stakes by launching more missiles to tariff boats importing drugs.

They are. Hillary Clinton facilitated many wars and killed many weak men.

Your government requires the executive branch to have authority. The alternative is lawlessness with nobody having the power or authority to execute your laws. Although it's possible some 4th branch agencies might have the authority to do what your president refuses to do. Without that, you don’t get some utopian “less authoritarian” government, you get paralysis and chaos because no one can carry out the laws your Congress passes.

Only the billionaires are getting richer, under this fascist regime, we can't have either.

Well, you added to the wealth of Ariana Grande by joining her followers. So I am sure she appreciates that concession on your part. I apologize when I insinuated that she didn't really care about you.

Your 20% culture is slowly getting squeezed out of mainstream culture, so it makes sense that you would rage against the extinction of a culture you built your entire life around. I totally understand your frustration. It's the same frustration every dying culture goes through.

Your post reads like the manifesto of a guy who shoots up Christian churches. Scary times for you guys.

I sincerely apologize for slandering Charlie Kirk, and sorry I struck a personal nerve. I suppose your voters will decide if being richer is a pressing issue or staying alive and violence free is a priority, assuming you can't have both.

First of all, the right didn’t need to pledge allegiance to the cult leader

You guys kinda forced what you have today by shooting a part of his ear off. That along with the escalating violence over the 2024 election result is ensuring a catch 22, where you can embrace the violence and lose normal voters or reject the violence and lose the crazy vote. Your left party is looking more and more like our NDP party. That's not a compliment.

Ask Charlie Kirk if his life has gotten any better.

Too soon?

I seriously doubt a multimillionaire singer really gives a crap about the lives of the peasants beneath her.

It's all pretend and games to increase her following.

Would you be willing to convert all of America to look like Sweden, Switzerland, or Japan with a single national culture if it meant less deaths overall (including gun deaths?)

Most women have a natural instinct to eliminate or shun weak men, so they will happily vote for a war that accomplishes this.

Trump is the one spreading hate.

I think you really meant to say "the only one", assuming you disregarded every shred of wisdom in my sincere previous post to you.

There's a minimum amount of intelligence required to be humorous as well. You can ask Kimmel and Colbert about that aspect. Dehumanizing humor in America is going the way of the Nazis, thankfully. Many stations refuse to air all that hate today. I hope that one day you will reject dehumanizing humor as well. Life is too short to waste energy spreading hate and using humor as a thin shield of justice and decency. Don't let your hate slowly turn you into a monster. The world will be a much better place when you leave it without spreading hate.

What's inspiring the ruahes, what I think you mean to say, are the messages sketched into bullets.

Our humor is definitely not aligned.

Thanks for being honest, I appreciate your insights.

You and DoubleR are not doing any favors for your radical left with all your dehumanizing rhetoric. But I suppose the crazy people generally tend to be the loudest and most visible.

War comes to weak countries in need of culling of weak men.

All straight women want to say yes to the bad boys, and Trump is the worst.

Haiti isn't a race, though. Neither is Springfield, I reckon.

Your institutions like the FBI need serious fixes to prevent raids on presidential candidates’ homes or threatening email investigations during an election.. If a spectacular failure is what finally drives meaningful reform, then maybe some good will come from your current president’s failures. At the very least, someone like Comey won't ever think again that they are completely above the law or consequence when meddling in your Democracy. Untouchable should not apply to your FBI, or as the previous poster said, any of your 4th branches.

it was the stated reason the prosecutor refused to bring charges.

I could not find a source with the words "no evidence."

That phrasing seems more like propaganda than reality, unless you have a source for that quote. Even if one existed, which I doubt, common sense and reality indicates some evidence, however disputed it may be. However, the claim of "no evidence" is highly unlikely and seems like a deliberate attempt to deceive the people.

It's just a label. Treat it with the same disdain as a can of soup. Unless you want to turn people into soup with dehumanizing labels.

Nonetheless, one would like to assume that the term United Nations means exactly what it says.

Democrats used to mean non-violent and cared about working families in the 1990's

Now the radical Yanks call them "MAGA"

Of course, it will fail spectacularly. But that's the point.

So much MAGA.