Be respectful wylted, you are talking about the woman I love.
Be respectful wylted, you are talking about the woman I love.
The Holocaust is one of the most well documented and widely testified events in history
Believing this depends on trusting the sources saying it's true. Most people aren't going to go around interviewing all Holocaust survivors. The issue isn't the primary sources and evidence, it's the secondary sources claiming the evidence exists and is so abundant. I trust those sources, but only because people are allowed to challenge them and they can withstand scrutiny.
Yeah yeah, and believing the Earth is not flat depends on trusting the sources saying it isn’t. Most people aren’t going to go around interviewing astronauts, The issue isn’t the primary sources and evidence, it’s the secondary sources claiming the evidence exists and is so abundant. Blah blah blah.
We have all seen this argument hundreds of times, it’s an argument that fits any agenda, and it’s always presented as something new and to the point, if you think “conspiracy” is new, or in any way constitutes a valid argument, you are totally out of touch with the real world.
Free speech is not an absolute right, there are contextual limitations, and a responsibility for consequences. There are moral and legal restrictions regarding obscenity, threats, fraud and misrepresentation, defamation, and incitement to violence. If Germany legally restricts holocaust denial, it’s because in context, they have seen the violence that the antisemitic agenda can produce, ISIS recruitment is illegal in many countries, there is good reason for that too, RemyJones’ advocating rape and violence against women has consequences, SatanLucy advocating pedophilia has consequences, they need to be held accountable, and “freedom of speech” is not an absolute right, it’s not a justification, and it’s not a tactic for silencing disapproval or opposition.
There is nothing to be learned from a discussion about the “reliability of the evidence”, the discussion unavoidably becomes “why” do you question the reliability of the evidence, in the end, the only relevant question is “what is your agenda”?
The fact that no discussion is being had makes the evidence less reliable. Claims of evidence and documentation can be fabricated. An organization could pay a dozen people to claim they are experts who thoroughly studied the issue and then lie about it. For experts to be reliable, I have to believe there is a cost to lying (i.e. that people would be able to call them out).
The fact that you mix “conspiracy” with the huge lie that “no discussion is being had” about one of the internet’s most virally discussed topics is absurd, I really don’t think there is anyone here dumb enough to actually buy that slop, sure, it works with those who share the agenda, but so what. That isn’t an argument, it’s just a tired old tactic.
“Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.” ― Dwight D. Eisenhower
There are plenty of fake quotes on the internet.
There is plenty of holocaust denial on the internet too, and a mountain of discussion about the evidence, and of course antisemitism is invested in denying that reality, but again, that is a matter of agenda, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the facts.
This one is real, but the point is that your argument here isn't using primary evidence, it's using secondary and tertiary sources talking about the evidence. I have to trust those before I can consider the evidence, and free speech is important for that.
Yes, free speech is important to antisemitism, along with fascism, pedophilia, racism, misogyny, ISIS recruitment, etc. Many in these groups see free speech as a tool that can be used to suppress dissent. I have a right to express my disapproval of these things, and despite the incessant accusations that disapproval amounts to suppression of free speech, no it doesn’t. that is simply a tactic of those with an agenda. I don’t disapprove of free speech, I disapprove of antisemitism, and I will continue to exercise my right to free speech no matter how many times people try to use “free speech” as a weapon to silence that opposition.
I have a right to express my opinion; you should stop trying to destroy free speech.
I don't think Lucy was saying you don't have a right to your opinion, just saying they disagreed with it.
Of course he was, typically attacking an opposing opinion with the accusation of "destroying free speech", that's his MO. What he said in response to my post was "What a good excuse to destroy free speech, by saying that your opinion cannot be challenged because you say so".
I said nothing even close to that deliberate misrepresentation, I gave my opinion and I expect it to be challenged, and Lucy’s lame ass tactic of claiming I am “destroying free speech” by having an opinion that disagrees with him, is both dishonest and illogical.
Please show me where I said, or even vaguely implied, that “my opinion cannot be challenged because I say so”, you can’t, because it is a stupid lie, a stereotypical and childish attempt to discredit an opposing point of view.
What a good excuse to destroy free speech, by saying that your opinion cannot be challenged because you say so.
I have a right to express my opinion; you should stop trying to destroy free speech.
The Holocaust is one of the most well documented and widely testified events in history, no rational person without an agenda of antisemitic prejudice could reasonably deny, or even question, the veracity of the evidence. Much like the situation with flat earther’s, there is no logical reason to discuss the referenced facts, it’s an exercise in gullible stupidity to debate whether or not the Eart is flat, when the question comes up, the inquiry necessarily turns to the psychology and associated motivations of the individual. There simply isn’t a sincere questioning of the facts of the holocaust at work, there is only an agenda.
There is nothing to be learned from a discussion about the “reliability of the evidence”, the discussion unavoidably becomes “why” do you question the reliability of the evidence, in the end, the only relevant question is “what is your agenda”?
“Get it all on record now - get the films - get the witnesses -because somewhere down the road of history some bastard will get up and say that this never happened.” ― Dwight D. Eisenhower
Documenting History: Eisenhower and the Holocaust (U.S. National Park Service)
Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust - Wikipedia
OK, OK, so Fauxlaw didn't actually watch the Oscars, but he did receive the vicious motherhood slur against Trump on his headset.
In other words be a punching bag.
Crush them with a seven second pause, it's almost cruel.
Ooohhh, you so logical.
Yes. I used to think smoking was bad, but now I know its actually good and probably the reason I am different from other people is that I was second hand smoker since birth.
Sugar and cigarettes, breakfast of champions.
I read that nicotine is a brain stimulant, so I decided to become smoker. I need my brain well stimulated, and living a healthy life eating vegetables doesnt achieve that.
Ooohhh, you so logical.
RemyBrown changed his mind on many issues in past 2 years.
So you are saying RemyBrown is unstable?
Thanks, but everyone already knew that he is unstable.
You are literally an idiot
thats not a good thing to say just because someone disagrees with you.
It's a good thing to say if the person you are talking to is literally an idiot.
They want you to guess what they saw last night.
He saw "motherhood" as a sign if TDS, I don't see how anyone could guess that.
As always, I think we are just supposed to say "WTF" when we read his posts.
If you filter out the stereotypical "us/them" hate rhetoric, this OP says two things:
1) this is what I saw on the Oscars last night.
2) I didn't watch the Oscars last night.
I suppose it makes MAGA sense.
I simply say people need to accept that pedophiles are big part of society, and then maybe some solution can be found which benefits all.
So far spreading hate and violence didn't seem to benefit anyone much.
This is why I recommend using a less emotional term "map" instead of pedophile.
So that people can get their emotions under control, and then try to logically solve the problem, maybe talk about it in a more calm way for a start.
Because angry words aren't going to solve anything.
There simply must be a solution beneficial to all, and what people did so far benefited mostly no one.
I say solution beneficial to all, because map people are simply too big part of society, much bigger than LGBT, and if the only solution is to harm them, well, then the big part of society is harmed for not much benefit.
And going with Draconian punishments didn't really seem to work for USA.
So something else must be tried, maybe a bit of more balanced approach instead of whatever nonsense people did so far.
We elected a pedophile president, what more do you want freak?
So based on your analysis America has the highest pedophila cases.
It's hard to get accurate statistics because sometimes American pedophiles pretend to be from Bosnia.
Not from the women. Are you prepared to forgo their vote?
Yeah, good point, I'll have to let SatanLucy live for likes, that's all he's got.
I'll just have to sit back and watch SatanLucy and RemyBrown battle it out for King of the Creeps.
If being an incel means, "get angry at women for choosing the bear", then we need more incels. Do better Skywalker; become an incel.
Will that get me "likes", that's all that's important.
'm married, have three sons, two grandsons, and more friends than I have the time for, career, hobbies, volunteer work, adventures, and a broad range of human relationships to be had through "social interaction"
It is great that you achieved all those goals, even tho you failed to get likes online or even be appreciated online.
Oh no, if I don't get likes my life is not worth living, boo hoo.
His post got 2 likes, while yours got 0.
He is more likeable.
Believe it or not, there's more to life than the likes you get online, a lot more.
I'm married, have three sons, two grandsons, and more friends than I have the time for, career, hobbies, volunteer work, adventures, and a broad range of human relationships to be had through "social interaction", it goes on and one, every day is a new day. It may seem alien as hell to you, but to the rest of us, it's called being a normal, well-adjusted human being.
To find out what I'm talking about, you will need to put down the bag of Cheetos, get up off the couch. leave your mom's basement and actually go outside.
Out there you will find what the rest of us call the real world; you should try it sometime.
But if you do put down the Cheetos, get off mom's couch, and actually go outside to try it out, while you are out there at least, try not to be so damn creepy.
So Remy, can you be precise as to where this event took place...It would be helpful to know the facts of the issue.
Many thanks.
If like all of his so called events, it took place in his own imagined psychodrama...does that make it "the facts of the issue".
I really don't think you can refer to any product of his delusional state as a "fact".
But as I said, I have no logical interest in women.
Well, certainly not in women over the age of nine or ten.
Creepy, part 2.
Let's actually imagine I was alone with a woman, even tho that never even happened. I would ask for sex. If she says yes, then sex lasts 5 minutes, and what then? Then it's awkward. And if she says no to sex, then it again becomes awkward.
Son of Creepy.
And there you go, that is just creepy.
I am just saying, what would I do if I was alone with a woman? I don't like talking to women, and sex only lasts for 5 minutes assuming there is any.
Creepy, part 2.
And there you go, that is just creepy.
I am just saying, what would I do if I was alone with a woman? I don't like talking to women, and sex only lasts for 5 minutes assuming there is any.
Creepy, part 2.
Women would still rather be alone with a bear than alone with either one of you
I don't think thats true, but I am not interested in women. I don't see what would I do if I was alone with a woman. Seems boring.
And there you go, that is just creepy.
Looks like you are upset that I go to heaven, as Bible says.
Now you say Bible doesnt mean what it says.
Maybe you dont mean what you say as well.
But still, my goal is achieved now for sure, because Jesus was virgin too. PRAISE!!!!
Congratulations, women find you so creepy that you are practically a holy man.
All incels go to heaven, woo hoo.
There's no way Remy can stop being creepy
He is not being creepy.
Of course, I understand you creeps have to stick together, it's good that you support each other, maybe if you can aggregate enough social outcasts into a creep group of their own, then you can pretend it's the normal people that are the outcasts.
Women would still rather be alone with a bear than alone with either one of you, but hey, at least you have each other to do, I don't know exactly what creeps actually do, but whatever it is, you can do your creepiness together.
You can call your group "Creepsters", or maybe just "Creeple".
You are just a bigot.
By definition, a creep is someone that creeps out other people, that doesn't make them a bigot, just a person experiencing your creepiness.
That's why it's best that you only leave your mom's basement if you absolutely have to.
No, it doesn't say that.
Yes, it does.
Revelation 14:4
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.
No, it still doesn't....as usual, you are spewing pure nonsense. Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of Christianity knows you'd have to be a complete moron to translate Revelation literally...and you also have to know mothing at all about Christianity.
Anyone with half a brain and even a remote familiarity with Christianity knows that Salvation has nothing to do with maintaining physical virginity, it is universally understood in Christian theology to be through faith in Jesus Christ and his teachings.
Praise Allah, I go to heaven now for sure!
LOL, ok, well, good luck with that, and I hope you have a good time in virgin heaven.
In Bible, it says that only virgins go directly to heaven.
No, it doesn't say that.
Sounds like good advice.
There's no way Remy can stop being creepy, but he should try anyway.