SomeDebatePerson

I just don't understand science like I used to.

You can just tell the mods to delete this debate.

I'll accept it soon. I will just decide how much research I will need.

I will be arguing that geocentrism is at least possible according to modern science. You will have to argue that it is impossible. "Rated" means you will gain or lose actual points. You will make the opening argument first.

I believe the universe rotates around the Earth.

That is not really nonbinary.

I am not a flat-earther

If it's so ridiculous, how will debating me make it look true? If geocentrism is so obviously false, you should have nothing to fear.

You're welcome to try debating me.

And the scientists aren't on your side.

You're arguments are either complete lies or things that have nothing to do with the center of the universe, like saying the Earth isn't the center of the Milky Way. We're talking about the whole universe. Don't be like Newton and limit things to the solar system to make things easy.

Accept the debate if you think you can prove it. Don't just use the comments to put arguments forth.

It's not 2025 anymore.

Honestly, you will probably have to remove this vote of fauxlaw too.

Fauxlaw literally proved I was right but voted against me. He ignored that the debate assumed atheism was true. My point was that our world can really only exist with an intelligent being. If we remove God, it basically makes our world a simulation created by something smarter but not all-powerful and omniscient.

He said I was arguing against atheism by allowing a maker. This is my whole point. Atheism means no ultimate creator, but I argued for a created creator of worlds. Even atheism would need a creator.


Just read it. He literally proved I was right but had his grudges.

Please remove fauxlaw's vote.

Fauxlaw ignored my entire argument. He claims I didn't define the term, but I did. He says it implies a "divine" role, but this is not what the title means at all. (I would be blasphemous to call Mary divine.) I provided an actual source for my definition. He seems to put his own personal beliefs into his vote too. This was a biblical debate, and he put his unbiblical Jesus alone theology into his vote. He also claims that the title somehow dishonors Jesus' role. He uses the old "Mary would be nothing without Jesus" argument when the title literally acknowledges that.

A completely biased and dishonest vote.

Please vote

please vote

Please vote

Please vote. I know you are a huge opponent of atheism.

Please vote

Please vote

Thanks for voting. What are you doing back here?

Thanks for voting!

vote, pls

Pls vote

A bunch of hard work for nothing

Vote!

Vote

Where are you?

Vote!