This is an American site. I said he was bad for the site. I disagree that European laws matter or apply to us.
They don't and they shouldn't and laws that are anti freedom of speech are inherently evil. We should restrict our speech because God tells us to, not because evil empires such as England do.
Any criticism of my or gratefulgoys rfd is misplaced. I owe it to the defender to read the case for him but I am allowed to have an opinion on whether he should be banned without going into detail
I think Remy should be banned but kinda want to change my vote after reading a bit because Kohai's arguments are offensive to anyone who values free speech . No he shouldn't be banned for having offensive arguments Kohai. He should be banned because he is a net negative for the site
Loss of democratic institutions aren't necessarily bad though. Remove that please
I have never done competitive debate outside of this format, I will defer to you, and I do try to respect the live debate format when figuring out how I should judge since the site is evolved from an attempt to practice for live debates.
The way I have approached BOP sounds like the same way you do for debates but honestly I wrote the statement you are responding to so long ago that maybe I contradicted myself there.
David the BOP should be on pro here. It's not something that should be split.
Thank you for taking time to look at the debate
Thanks for making the objectively correct decision
I would probbly give framework to whiteflame. I was assigned to vote this but its a ton of impacts to weigh. I'm not sure that I have the time to actually weigh that many impacts on each side. I think the topic may need to be refined more. I also don't usually click on the links to read citations as that is the debaters' jobs but I did here and I think to take these citations apart you need a lot fewer of them.
I am also reading a lot of dense law related shit because my degree has somehow made me qualified to be a consultant to real attorneys on a very niche area of the law/ It's a degree in cyber security which they were looking for and then they put me on digging into this section of law kinda randomly.
There were those who refused to do Y2K updates on their computers and they had no major problems. Those engineers until this day, consider themselves heros for fixing the non existent problem though
It gives you what you put into it. So probably just dumb so dumb prompts give you dumb results. I pay for premium so I could just do the same with a significantly better response or have an agentic AI do this for me and it will outperform him without issue. He opened the door, but I still don't think AI will do it back
Because I actually want to read the debate not the scenarios presented which take more concentration due to being boring as fuck. Plus I could have swore I already passed it
I will see if I can get chat GPT to do the quiz for me. it's bullshit. I am legacy user I shouldn't need to do it. Ugh
savant why would you concede the following? "I agree that quality of life should be the goal here."
it wont let me vote. how do i vite
if dinner is not ready the second I walk through the door or she back talks me than yes its justified
I wouldn't mind finding a way to tie it though if you are that concerned with an easy win tarnishing your record
The debate is unfinished but I prefer it remains because the intent was actually to get the essay I wrote in the first round out. I wish I did rebuttals but prefer it to stay anyway
I lost because of the jews
I wish I could join but I am not worthy
one can be an agnostic atheist or an agnostic theist. silly debate topic
