So, right now it's between Bullish and Mikal for me. I feel pretty good about Luna being town tbh, and if I'm right about that, one of those two has to be scum. I guess both technically could be scum but I kinda doubt it. Anyway, I'm leaning towards Bullish and after an ISO of him, this post (DP1#382) stands out to me:
This is classic mafia theory, I've typed this out before but it looks like google did not index it.
mass char claim makes sense if 2 of the 3 are true:
chars are not closely linked to roles
char pool is limited, so CCs are possible
there is a clear theme split
In our case 1 is true, 2 and 3 are half true. So I'm not opposed to a mass char claim, but I won't advocate for it very hard either.
I hate this post. 2 is not "half-true"; there are well over a hundred named elements on the periodic table that could potentially be claimed! It's weird to claim that 3 is half-true as well, given that we don't know the theme split and we certainly don't know if it's clear. Plus, theme splits in Pie's games are often very subtle and non-obvious. I see no reason to assume this game would be different.
And saying "not opposed to a mass claim, not necessarily for it" feels very scummy to me after the last game, where Thoth was advocating for one and got sussed and almost lynched over it. This post is just very bad and I hate it.