Rex's response to RT's claim confused me, since he seemed to be presenting lynching RT as a win-win regardless of whether he's telling the truth, which is not accurate. His contributions so far just haven't been enough for me to form an opinion on him otherwise.
Read RT's original claim:
If I'm lynched during the day phase the next day phase is skipped. If mafia kills me in the night the next day phase is skipped. Basically it is in everyone's best interest in keeping me alive.
He mistyped, saying that we would skip a DP if he was lynched or if he was NKd. I said we should just lynch him, because if we don't then scum will definitely NK him and we'll skip a DP anyway, and because I find the claim sus. He later clarified that if he's NK'd an NP will be skipped, not a DP. I still think it's an incredibly suspicious claim, and the fact that he flubbed it makes it even worse. I also find it scummy that he quickhammered, saying in the last post that Luna told him to do it, then Luna winds up dead, conveniently unable to corroborate this. Then he's also withholding info on Luna's full claim, which is asus because there's no conceivable reason why town shouldn't have that info. It should have been in the janitor'd flip to begin with. Overall I find him very suspicious and it'd be hard to budge me off of him as a lynch target.
If we have a vig I'd say NK him, otherwise he's my top pick. Most of my other reads are null (lean scum on Supa for innactivity, lean town on Casey for making reasonable, pro-town points that I had thought but hadn't posted), aside from Pie whom I town read for his play and the reads that I've bounced off him in our PM.