Thank you so much for accepting, this should prove fun.
If I needed more than one, I would place more than one.
I probably won't vote, but if I do, my vote will also be in rap form.
I won't need more than one.
This debate was rage bait, but apparently that is popular now.
I have actually embarrassed many biologists in similar debates. I always held position that biology isnt a real science but just something real science laughs at.
So I come to debate a biologist on topic of evolution, and he starts yapping about how evolution happened and how species evolved.
So I ask him "Can you define species?".
I was actually expecting him to be able to define it given that he is a biologist, but no. Biology cant even define the very terms it uses. Its pathetic, honestly.
At the end, he was unwillingly arguing that fire is species because it grows and reproduces. This was after he said that reproduction is passing on the genes, and I asked "How do you know that thats reproduction?".
I mean, anyone who believes there are only 2 genders is either insane or retarded.
Even if someone is retarded enough to assume gender and sex are same things, he would still be wrong because some people dont even have genitals and some are not capable of reproduction so they dont fit the "male/female" definitions at all.
Tetrahymena thermophila: This microscopic, single-celled ciliate protozoan has seven distinct sexes (mating types) that can freely interact, hook up, and exchange genetic material.
Chromosomal and Anatomical Variations: Not all bodies fit neatly into the typical XX or XY binary. Variations include conditions such as Klinefelter syndrome (XXY), Turner syndrome (X0), or other chromosomal differences.
Intersex / DSD: Up to 1% of the population is born with differences of sex development (DSD), where reproductive or sexual anatomy doesn't fit the typical definitions of strictly male or female. While medical and biological consensus largely views these as developmental variations rather than separate, distinct biological sexes, they highlight that physical and genetic traits exist along a spectrum.
I don't eat anything of that.
I am on a strict chocolate fruit diet.
It's only when I run out of chocolate and fruit that I have to eat something yucky like a potato and similar food which plebs eat.
I belong to true white race, because I am pale like vampire. That's all thanks to my diet and dodging sunlight at all costs.
It's difficult to be white, but it's even more difficult to stay white. Most white people I know turned into something similar to brown or mixed.
Truth is, being white isn't something permanent unless you make effort to keep your skin white. It won't stay white if you spend time in sunlight, if you eat food which affects skin color, if you do something stupid like constant manual labor.
I mean, he said it
I was afraid he quit forever because of Christianity.
Also, who in west poops like that? By standing on the toilet?
Indian toilets are scientific? Well, you learn something new every day.
Fully agree. My cat is one of smartest cats in existence. At some point, I even managed to teach cats how to say my name and make requests from me.
Ok, one more vote I guess and then we can move to next round.
Thank you for voting!
Well, somebody better fucking vote already because I have been waiting for months to get the last 2 votes. I dont care if its votes against my position, even I dont agree with my position. But I cant move to next round because of this vote delay, and whole thing is just stuck for months.
Voting is over. There is no sense crying about it anymore. People have spoken. If most people want Remy Brown on site, surely that makes it more likely for people generally to want him on the site, including new users.
Nope, I am just telling you that giving things to people doesnt work if what you give them sucks.
@GreatfulGoy
Oh, its not about giving as in "just give something".
Its about giving people what they really want.
Sure, someone can give me a present, but if that present sucks, I am not gonna be fascinated.
"Charisma is an extremely underrated skill that I lack proficiency in myself"
Its not just charisma. In fact, charisma itself on its own is irrelevant.
What you lack is actually "giving to others".
You always come with approach of "give nothing, take all", and you wonder why that doesnt work for you.
You have to give something useful to others.
If someone was extremely boring to everyone and gave nothing to others, who would be his friend?
If politician promised to give nothing, who would elect him?
If some business wanted to pay workers 0 wage, who would work there?
The idea that you can even function without giving to others, is absurd.
"not nearly as much as you've been doing in this thread and all over the website."
Yeah, but I am important to Satan.
For someone who is not important, you sure do a lot of talking.
Tho if we are already going to fight war, I want to establish some win conditions for this war.
I don't think win conditions such as "converting entire site to your religion" are even realistic, that would just make this war eternal.
I also don't think that having a mere majority counts as win, otherwise I already won. But I guess it is still possible for you to gain majority of masses or majority of moderation team, even tho I consider such possibility very unrealistic.
But there is one clear win condition which you were after for a long time, and that is to get me banned from the site. So I guess it does technically count as a win if you succeed in that.
My win condition is to merely preserve free speech and demonic rule. So I win as long as demonic rule is maintained on this site. You win if you establish rule of your Lord.
"We must be alert, the war within the website is only beginning. Can the site turn to the Lord before it is too late?"
Demon powers are rising. Against them, there is no victory.
"They will do everything possible within to corrupt you to think liberally."
Oh yeah, tho I am not a liberal. I identify as demon of Cult Venus. This debate was won by 66.6 % of votes. That's pretty demonic.
"For now, off the hook."
Yeah, but I do still recommend a variety in topics you post. As far as I know, this trial was mostly based on repeatedly posting same topics about women. It wasnt about topic itself, it was more about repeatedly posting same or similar thing which was offensive. Maybe free speech won now, but this victory means nothing if its lost long term, and its gonna be lost if masses get frenzy because they control what happens on this site. I am all for maximum free speech, but it entirely depends on willingness of masses here to enforce it.
I think you don't realize true power of free speech.
Let's say that the worst should happen. Let's say a nazi joins this site and starts denying holocaust.
We can ban him, true. But will that make world better place? No, that nazi will go somewhere else where he might even gain support for his views. And members on this site who lean towards his views will remain unchanged.
Now, let's say we didn't ban him. Let's say he presented his views, but instead of banning him, community united to argue against those views and show how absurd they are.
Now you get an entirely different outcome. Members who might lean towards nazi no longer do because they see how absurd the view is.
Even nazi himself might consider abandoning nazism after seeing how absurd his position is.
So what is the result? More people think nazism is absurd.
This is the difference between free speech and censorship.
Censorship protects absurd views by preventing debates to challenge them.
Free speech destroys any absurd views, because they are openly debated and their absurdness is exposed.
@GreatfulGoy
"Airmax owns this website and used to rule with a strong, firm grip that even disciplined me when I was a little shit back then."
Things have changed. Spanking is no longer a popular way of behavior modification.
This is a debating site. People have countless reasons to quit a debate site, one of major ones being losing debates.
Personally, I would quit if free speech was abolished, and I am sure a lot more people would too.
People come on this site to express, so I am fairly certain freedom of expression is necessary to begin with.
And we can't guarantee that if we ban all trolls and rage baiters, that we will still have a site which is even alive.
This site was what site before it was for years. A very small community.
Reducing that community further, in hope that some new people will pour in, yeah probably not a good idea.
All free speech within bounds of law? Sounds good, I hope you mean US, Japan, or Norway law. I can think of few other countries in Europe which have plenty of free speech, so I am hoping its their law which applies.