Everybody who is you is technically a bully.
Thats because I had a bad childhood, so I am a victim.
Everybody who is you is technically a bully.
Thats because I had a bad childhood, so I am a victim.
So far it wasnt. The rich are only getting richer.
AI says I look 25 to 30, which still means that I am young and innocent and not old and demented.
Thinking about it, if you were around 30 when we first exchanged ideas, you must now be getting on for around 40.
Ew, thats the worst thing anyone ever said to me. I can be around 30 for a decade. When I am around 40, I will hide in the display of shame.
But you can see my photo I posted, so its clear I am around 30, which is 25 to 35.
You're the bully, I'm the victim, boo hoo hoo.
Everyone who is not me is technically a bully.
your 1st 10 amendments haven't been changed
Because they didn't bother the rich too much.
This is exactly why your government has a constitution
I mean, constitution can be changed too. It's not really something which is a sure eternal thing.
And regulated capitalism is a government official fucking up your shack, so you are forced to sleep on the ground or a rich man's property
Regulated capitalism is just something which happens anyway because rich have every incentive to take control of government.
So even if you had your unregulated capitalism full of shacks and slums, it wouldn't take many centuries before rich crawl into government power to "fix it".
It's why capitalism doesn't work either way. Money is power, and those who have it will find a way how to make use of it. Irrelevant of if it's bribing governments or gangs or destroying competition in ways not usually considered moral.
It's why you really need a dictator who can't be bribed. Presidents are all puppets who just do what big businesses want, because those big businesses just happen to fund their campaigns and throw some extra money in pocket when no one is looking.
grow the facial hair.
Sure, I will send you a photo of how my facial hair actually looks like. Tho it's gonna take a month or two. It grows slow and ends up being disgusting anyway.
no it's actually massive if girth gets included
There is not much difference in grith either. People just watch too much porn and get unrealistic idea of what average penis is. If we were to believe porn, average black man is wielding a 9 inch huge monster in his pants, but that just ain't true on average. Porn just tends to prioritize bigger dicks as first search results, so those who watch porn tend to think their own penis is small. Reality is that average penis doesn't exceed 6 to 7 inches, in any race.
Sure, you can use that example, make a shack on your front lawn
Yes, so unregulated capitalism is shacks and slums of India.
You should bear in mind, the largest penises worldwide are black
Eh, the difference is tiny on average between black men and white men. That half an inch extra isn't really gonna make black men attractive to white women, given their crime rates, poverty, and being a dad who leaves.
Boo hoo hoo, you're a big meanie
No, I am a victim of society.
Yeah, flying car would be classified as an aircraft. And your driving license would be invalid for it.
You, physically go to your front yard and start laying down some wood
Unless you are referring to slums, tents and shacks in India as an example of unregulated capitalism, I am afraid that buying land and building a decent house on it costs too much for a lot of people, because rich people drive up the price of land and house materials by buying them on large scale, increasing demand and lowering supply. If 40% of people who live under rent even tried that, it would merely drive up demand even more. Rich people affect demand and supply disproportionately by buying a lot of land and houses, which leaves less for rest of population, and over time this problem only increases.
I'm also guessing that BK AKA Lucy, is not around 30 and is stylistically disingenuous, typically someone much younger
Yes, I just look and behave younger than I am. It's trans age. You wouldn't understand.
Don't take my word for it; physically go to your front yard and start laying down some wood, and see who comes first to fuck you in the asshole. A rich person, or a government official paid by a rich person
So a rich person or a rich person? Yeah, I don't see what point are you even trying to make here, other than proving that capitalism even when unregulated just corrupts itself and it's government eventually. And owning land to build a house on also becomes increasingly difficult as rich people take greater and greater portion of lands. Let's not forget that every landlord's dream is to abolish regulations. Without any regulations or even with bad regulations, rich people only get more room to act. Capitalism isn't a working system, so it pretty much fails in non-proportional demand, creating situation where rich have every incentive to try and control markets, own houses and land and farmland, and even production directed for rich to make themselves richer at expense of everyone else, and mostly at expense of bottom of society.
Actually, it happens all the time
No, the idea that there is a country out there where rich people can't buy anything, not even land or houses or businesses, and it's unregulated capitalism without government? That's just some fairy tale of the anarchs and capitalists, multiplied by the fact that capitalism can't even exist without government because property rights are not found in nature among rabbits and foxes but are made by elected dictators in power which uphold them.
By making me into a bully, you are victimizing me, that makes you the bully and me the victim.
Yes, it's infinite regress.
Trump has now made that zero on the $37 trillion debt
USA is a debt based economy now. Almost all new money which comes in circulation is debt. That's why US debt exceeds entire amount of money in economy. It's literally "impossible to pay off".
Rich people can buy zero stuff from people who do not want to sell
This doesn't happen in reality, sorry. Only in your imagination do rich people buy "zero stuff".
Being a victim is not a disadvantage or a bad thing in politics or life. In fact, if people view you as victim, they are far more likely to support you and feel compassion for you. People who think Palestinians are victims are far more likely to support Palestine and hate Israel.
For this reason, I invented 3 new political doctrines, sort of like Trinity of victimhood:
First is called "Victim Doctrine".
Second is called "Victim Guilt Doctrine".
Third is called "Victim Innocence Doctrine".
Victim doctrine is basically about always presenting yourself as a victim even when you are not. This enables removing guilt from yourself for any mistakes you make and placing them on others, so we arrive at second doctrine.
Victim Guilt Doctrine is about placing guilt on others, and important part here is, you dont just blame some specific part of society or specific individual for making you a victim. Instead, you blame everyone.
Victim Innocence Doctrine is a crucial part. Israel fails here. You cannot pretend to be a victim while doing bad things. It doesnt work. People dont buy it. So if someone wants to pretend to be a victim, he must also be harmless and not do bad things to others which would make whole point of doctrine pointless, cuz point of doctrine is to win over others.
Women who were victims of rape can make use of these two doctrines very well. They can blame all their mistakes on others, and they can likewise blame entire society for not doing enough or much at all to stop rape.
As long as I am the victim, everyone else is a bully, all my mistakes are their fault, and even if my position becomes worse and people start insulting me, it just means I am even more of a victim, so I have more room to complain and more reason for people to feel compassion towards me.
I even invented a political doctrine called "Victim Doctrine" which says that person should always present himself as victim even when he is obviously not, he should have a long list of things to complain about and blame all his actions and failures on others, while listing countless of problems other people caused him.
This doctrine is supported by research:
Victim Mentality (Psychology): A psychological mindset or cognitive habit where an individual or group consistently views themselves as a victim of others' actions, avoiding personal responsibility and attributing all negative outcomes to external malice or misfortune
Identifiable Victim Effect: A behavioral bias where people feel much stronger empathy, emotional response, and willingness to help a single, specific, identified victim compared to a large, statistical, or anonymous group of people in the same danger.
You're singing your song, "Wah wah wah, poor poor pitiful me".
As long as I am the victim, everyone else is a bully, all my mistakes are their fault, and even if my position becomes worse and people start insulting me, it just means I am even more of a victim, so I have more room to complain and more reason for people to feel compassion towards me.
I even invented a political doctrine called "Victim Doctrine" which says that person should always present himself as victim even when he is obviously not, he should have a long list of things to complain about and blame all his actions and failures on others, while listing countless of problems other people caused him.
This doctrine is supported by research:
Victim Mentality (Psychology): A psychological mindset or cognitive habit where an individual or group consistently views themselves as a victim of others' actions, avoiding personal responsibility and attributing all negative outcomes to external malice or misfortune
Identifiable Victim Effect: A behavioral bias where people feel much stronger empathy, emotional response, and willingness to help a single, specific, identified victim compared to a large, statistical, or anonymous group of people in the same danger.
You can use whatever word you like. Women invented word incel for a specific purpose, to mock men who cant get a girlfriend or please all the insane standards girlfriend has for them, and its interesting that standards men have are always lower than standards women have. The mere "he has to earn more money than I do" standard already disqualifies virtually half men from dating an average woman.
No, rich can buy way more stuff from market than any average person can, and investing in rare resources and limited supply goods, products and things such as land, houses, farmland, businesses merely makes them richer, while driving price up of those things for everyone else. Likewise, economy of scale favors rich over anyone else, so the wealth and material possessions inevitably lean towards the rich, and production likewise becomes more and more oriented towards the rich, which causes decrease of resources available for production for average person.
Incoherent babbling....can you give me a wah wah wah?
Jews invented the circumcision, so they are the reason I have useless bent soft unattractive ugly incompetent penis. My penis is literally a Jewish invention.
No, the rich can and do take significant portion of the market. Concentration of money in few hands inevitably results in concentration of material possessions in few hands, which then increase wealth of rich people and their money, allowing further concentration.
Most single men prefer the peace of being single compared to the chaos of a modern woman.
Its not really about preference. Incel can try his best to date, please women, work a low paying job and try to meet women constantly, but they will all reject him, at least all the good looking women.
We should pity them.
Debby, you are a chief psychologist on this site. If I were president, I would appoint you as my Minister of Education. So be honest with me, is it my fault that I am incel, unlikable, incompetent and have horrible personality?
Only the government can take
No, the rich can take too.