SatanLucy

Rabbit eats vegetables.

Wolf eats rabbit.

Human eats chocolate, so he is superior to both.

the solution is unacceptable. I wont eat vegetables. I am not a rabbit.

Are you suddenly against ragebaiting now?

No, I am against witch trials based on rage baiting.

But I guess you are correct that Remy's trial itself is rage bait.

"You seem desperate to find God. Are you seriously ill?"

I dont think he is desperate to find God.

tho my health isnt that great, its actually getting worse. Apparently, refusing to eat any vegetables and being a chain smoker isnt healthy, who would know...

"Welcome to society. Those that dont like it are welcome to remove themselves from the group"

Or the group can just burn the witch because their crops failed, and the dummies can cheer in support because those who dont have mind of their own have mind of others.

"Its not "maybe", its *definitely*, and we as a community decide. "

So its subjective opinion of masses, not definite. Kinda like those witch hunts in past.

it’s unlikely you’d be straight up arguing with ChatGPT but copy pasting your argument and then “help me attack this” then basically paraphrasing etc

If someone was caught doing that, I would demand they lose a debate. Tho it's difficult to caught if paraphrasing.

I know that in future, it is probably gonna be a debating standard to use chatgpt to not just make, but attack arguments, because chatgpt is better at attacking arguments than making them.

However, I would prefer to delay such future as much as possible.

I don't like the idea that I am not just debating against a person, but also bunch of AI models person uses, maybe even those premium models which average debater doesn't have available.

If that can be stopped somehow, it would be great.

I don't mind debaters using Google and AI for brainstorming and research, but using it to straight up make arguments and counters, yuck.

Heh it does. When I give it sugar and water.

You can vote on Remy's debate too, I think.

not all ragebait is equivalent

Maybe, but it's not like we can agree on who gets to decide.

Socialism is good

Socialism is good

People support the socialist system

Power of people is invincible

Capitalism is destined to fail

The power of people will always prevail

- Chinese socialist song

Chinese people do love their socialism so much that they refuse to reproduce because they don't want their children to experience same socialist happiness they experienced. It's simply too much happiness in socialism for one person. It takes quite some time for person to get used to being happy all the time living a life of being happily owned by the socialist government.

Another problem of socialism is that people in socialism are too rich. Not materially, of course. But rich in education. Every day government educates them on proper way of thinking. It's a lot of education to make sure everyone is thinking properly. If someone doesn't think properly, then he is a capitalist enemy who secretly wishes to get rich, so government "educates" him in a special way out of such capitalist delusions.

Grateful thinks only his group can't do bad things.

He has that self-centered thinking where he thinks Christianity, no matter what, does less harm than any other religion, because he convinced himself it's the true religion, so his brain can't compute that maybe, just maybe, Christians are actually the spawn of Satan and Bible is a satirical work.

Satan does like making jokes like that.

Non-Christianity produced many horrible nations, such as Japan.

tho Christianity gave us trump and Hitler, and those priests who are too attached to altar boys.

"you have no clue what can really happen when people think non-Christian"

You mean the glorious nations such as ancient Greece and ancient Egypt? We should totally have that again instead of Christian nonsense, so you make a good argument against Christianity.

"This is still leaving you with the dilemma of being a low church Protestant remaining non-disproven."

Oh yeah, because one needs to disprove all versions of Christianity. Oh wait, they dont.

Yes. Each time leftists get in power, they bring USA closer to Communism.

Thank you for voting.

I am pretty sure anyone can claim anything as rage bait. Left just does so more often because leftism is based on censorship. Entire history of communism is history of censorship, and leftists are just modern communists.

I can accuse others of rage bait by saying their opinion upsets me emotionally.

So if someone says that abortion is okay, that upsets me because I think abortion is murder, and the person arguing for abortion is rage baiting by wanting to legalize murder.

the rich didnt create the debt.

Brainless masses did, by electing a series of leaders who had economic literacy of a drunk man going in debt to afford another beer.

After Communists killed all the rich people in Mao's China, they faced starvation because apparently, once you kill all competent people, only incompetent ones remain and those arent good for anything.

Once brainless masses get used to idea of rich people paying for all expenses brainless masses made, then that just motivates brainless masses to spend even more.

this type of democracy is indeed a path to communism.

Will you vote on debate which will decide if Remy gets banned or not? Its a simple vote, no voting standards.

I do less debates now.

Chatgpt is pretty much banned in ultrarated. If I ever saw anyone blatantly using it there, I would vote against him on that basis alone. Maybe chatgpt has its place in debating world, but that place isnt in ultrarated, for debating or for voting.

You said you are a trans that hates trans people. Is that restricting your choices?

Well, I wouldn't date a trans woman because one of them was mean to me.

Hi

Hey, I am still waiting for virtual currency to be added to this site, like it was at some point said would happen.

tho to be reminded, this site doesnt have a lot of people who do coding. If it was up to me, I would do coding to fix these glitches, but I can only code or check code using AI, so I am only as good as AI is.

Patience is needed, because keep in mind that this site is a developing project by community of Dart. It was coded out of nothing by few people. Of course there are gonna be glitches. I mean, there are plenty of games out there which had much bigger teams for coding, and ended up being full of glitches.

Even "Where winds meet" has a glitch where once you die, you sometimes get stuck in that scene and gotta manually teleport back.

For start, it can be just 2D pets which don't move. So just images, basically. Design can be done by AI, that's easy.

It's a simple enough idea to make site more interesting.

And users can just have "pet collection" added to their profile, and one main pet equipped next to their profile photo.

If virtual currency system is put in place, users could also pay each other in virtual currency to debate some specific topic.

People are right now paying actual money to buy imaginary virtual currency in Roblox to buy virtual pets.

So virtual currency can also be a way for site to make a bit of money. For those not wanting to be active much, but still wanting virtual currency fast, they can just buy it.

There can also be virtual pet battle and leveling up pets using currency, if we ever get to that point.

Before you say no, this is an example of how it could look like: