SatanLucy

And all manner of associated twaddle

Venus is real Goddess, but only few people on Earth know that. I am thankful that I am among those who know.

It means you are making stuff up.

Even the demons believe and they tremble.

In your imagination, yes.

That has nothing to do with it

Says you.

Also, if it couldnt be more obvious, Venus Venera is the morning star planet. So yes, Venus is literally the morning star, a name christians gave to lucifer or whatever.

When people say that I worship Devil, they come up with this retarded claim that Bible invented the devil.

No, Bible merely took idea from Rome and ancient societies which worshipped dark Gods.

Lady Venera, Goddess Venus is Goddess of love, sex, war and power. She is the true Satan of the ancient world, and the true dark God of ancients.

https://spells8.com/lessons/venus-goddess-symbols-offerings/

Then why do you worship the devil?

I worship Venus, Lady Venera. Devil is modern name.

two ones fit inside two

But how much is two, and how do you know that?

He did a lot of positive stuff fiscally for the German people; he built a lot of highways and improved the German economy.

German economy in 1945 wasnt exactly any good.

"We cannot be defeated. We may be destroyed, but if we are, we will drag the world with us, the wold in flames."

Proslogion is also a good fiction book.

Most Influential Fiction Book

Bible and Alchemist are my two favorite fiction books.

Though as far as we are able to know, collective data assessments that come to a conclusion, are as reliable as they can be under the circumstances.

So no reliable proof.

I have already disproved math as a science.

Math says 1 + 1 = 2.

To prove this, math says that 2 is defined as "1 + 1".

Math says 1 + 1 isnt equal to 3.

But if I define 3 as "1 + 1", then 1 + 1 = 3

And I define 2 as "1+1+1".

So 1 + 1 isnt 2.

If you disagree with my definition, that is okay, I disagree with yours too.

Also, you cant prove that 2 is defined as "1 + 1".

Now, about God.

I define God as most powerful being which exists.

So we see that God exists by definition. If you present a different definition, I will reject it as unproved.

The only other definition which I would accept is "God is divine being above logic and above everything else.".

So in this way, we see that God logically must exist, because there is nothing which can prevent him from existing, as he is immune to all limiting conditions.

So God can create himself out of nothing, and any logical counter argument doesnt apply because God is above logic.

Male and female are terms which humans have come up with to describe individuals based on gamete type

So no proof that such description for term is correct. You just assumed.

It's generally accepted as the way procreation works in a great many species

No evidence that man is someone who produces sperm, and no evidence that procreation means person is a man.

Male produces sperm, female produces eggs

No evidence for this either.

So one doesn't need to make observations

So no observation evidence either. Too bad.

Man produces sperm.

How do you know this? From observation?

How do you know that it is a man?

Man is someone who is a strong warrior, and woman is someone who is weak. Thats how I know person in first post is a woman.

This is a man:

That is definitely not a man.

Also, I am making food supplies in case war starts in my country, which at this point most probably will.

Survival in nature isnt just about survival in nature. Think of it also like way to reduce food expenses in real life. It does come with risks, but dandelion is a plant which grows everywhere on its own and it is edible. I know the ones growing on my land are probably healthy because I dont spray any chemicals. However, turning them into edible food requires a process, usually blending, cooking or making paste by grinding. They truly cannot be eaten raw in any effective way.

If you are cooking a paste, it could taste better due to being warm, but it would lose some nutrition due to cooking if cooked on too high temperature. If cooked at low temperature, then it could have higher nutrition. But paste itself is already in great amount a broken down food and easy to eat and digest. Cooking wouldnt add much, it is just nice if available.

Effectively, just about anything we eat of an originally solid nature [not soup broth, for example] that actually requires chewing, ends up being a paste before swallowing.

Yes, but chewing is much slower. Especially for dandelion leaves and root. Not to mention how much energy it takes to chew raw dandelion root. The jaw starts to hurt. Maybe cooked is easier, but raw is definitely too difficult.

The easiest way is just put leaves in blender.

I see many people talking about flour in nature and how they dry food and grind it into flour for survival.

But flour itself is more difficult to make than paste, due to drying process.

Paste, is very easy to make.

Tools needed are just flat solid surface and something to grind the leaves with.

So it has 4 very simple steps:

1. Chop leaves in tiny pieces, but maybe remove middle of leaf fiber because that one is tough.
2. Add water or oil
3. Grind with rock, stick or anything, in circular motion, twisting and pressing the leaves.
4. Add oil or water (Water alone can be used too, but oil gives smooth paste) and keep grinding until you get the paste.

It is very easy to make it from leaves. I think it can be made from dandelion roots too.

The reason why you want the paste and not just eat raw leaves is in the fact that anyone who ever ate dandelion leaves knows what bother it is to chew them. Paste tho, is eaten easily.

Power.

Satanists were correct in this sense. The true morality is power.

Think about it. What rights could you possibly have, if it wasnt for some power protecting them? Power protects rights, enables rights, creates rights. Rights which dont have power are indeed self-defeating.

World works on power. Think about it. Wolf eats sheep. Frog eats butterfly. Why does this happen? Because wolf has more power than sheep. If sheep was stronger than wolf, would wolf be able to eat it? No.

The same law applies to humans. Some human groups are far stronger than others, and they of course get more resources and are better able to secure their desires.

What is power?

Power is ability to achieve one's will.

The ones who lack power and who arent protected by any power cannot achieve their will.

In this sense, and this is true by definition, the only way in which any morality can work is with power.

If morality doesnt have power, it cannot realize itself.

So primary goal of every morality must be power, or such morality cannot even exist.

Taoists did try to make a response to this by saying if a man has no desires, he doesnt need power, because he doesnt need to realize anything, and will have no unrealized desires.

But the main problem for Taoists is that such man would always be at mercy of powerful ones, and his existence would still depend on powerful ones sparing him.

Further, such man never realizes any desire, as he has none. So he has no any power (ability to realize desire).

So such man would not be most powerful, but most weak.

World is truly a competition between powerful ones. Think about it. If it wasnt for US and Europe military, China and Russia would own Europe and USA. The only thing which prevents them from conquering USA and Europe is the opposite power which would defeat them and prevent them from achieving their desire.

So there are indeed two types of power: First one is ability to achieve own desire, and second one is ability to prevent someone else from achieving their desire. The second can be included in first.

This world works on these laws, and human power is always finite, but some humans have more power than other humans, some groups have more power than other groups.

Power is not earned. Often it is given by mere luck, by mere position or place of birth.

Power is what all rights and laws rest upon. Think about it, if law had no power, how would law be enforced? If rights had no power on their side to protect them, what would protect them?

Power indeed is divided on protection and destruction.

Creation and transformation can be considered powers too.

In magic, likewise, spells are divided on protection, destruction, creation, transformation. This is the universal division of spells. There is no spell which isnt one of these.

I dont complain, my life is good. I dont work and still have more than those who do.

God has never controlled outcome

So you think universal human weakness happened by accident.

What dos it take to become a certified psychologist?

Probably not much. All psychologists I ever talked to were way below in intelligence than what you would expect from a scientist. Psychologists which you see in movies are one thing. In reality, most are just trash.

ChatGPT is made to support whatever you tell it.