SatanLucy

I'm going to exercise my sexual freedom to not have sex and there is nothing a woman can do to stop me!

I hate people who mock virgins. Better to be a virgin than a rapist, but most people are retarded and will treat virgin guy worse than a rapist.

Therefore your internal creation is either going to afford you solace or nightmares

False dichotomy. Religion in a true sense isnt there for comfort, especially not for comfort alone. It is there to make person stronger and more powerful, which often even involves discomfort, so it is neither comfort nor nightmare.

A. If the premise is true, then the conclusion must be true

No, there are cases where both premises are true, yet conclusion is false because argument is not logical.

B. If the premise is false, then the conclusion must be false.

No, the goal of argument is to prove conclusion true. However, conclusion can be true even if argument itself is wrong. In formal logic, one can use a false premise and end up with conclusion which is true. Because conclusion itself is a claim which is either true or not true, and this is independent of argument. Argument merely attempts to prove something true. It does not magically make something true. The conclusion, if true, would be true even if no one ever made the argument.

As for proving conclusion false, that is the job of counter-argument. The main goal of counter argument is to prove that either conclusion doesnt follow from premises, either that one of premises is wrong.

True argument (the one which has no counter-argument) is the one where conclusion must logically follow from premises, and all premises are true.

C. If the premise is false, then nonetheless, the conclusion is still true to the premise.

Sure.

D. If the premise is speculative, then the conclusion might be true or false or speculative

Conclusion can only be true or not true. No 3rd option exists. As for being unknown, that is not the state of conclusion but the state of mind. Gods can be true even if no human thinks they are. Gods do not depend on the state of human minds.

So my conclusion is that BK AKA Satan Lucy, finds ongoing/temporary solace

Atheists cant even think in form of premises and conclusion.

Saying something is self-evident doesn't work as evidence

People dont think based on evidence. If they did, thinking would be impossible.

That makes me think there is no substance to atheism then. All they do is shift burden of proof onto the alternative explanation and provide no explanation of their own besides "I don't know." Is that accurate?

Yes, the common answer I get from atheists is that they dont know. When I ask them about the conditions for existence, they cant seem to come up with a rational response as to what is a condition for something to exist in general. The first thing which ever existed can logically only have existence which is not conditional on any other thing. And the thing which is not conditional on any other thing is God. So in this sense, if things not conditional on any other thing can exist, then God can exist. And there is no explanation why first unconditional thing would exist and God (also unconditional thing) wouldnt. Further, when we define God as creator of logic who is himself above logic, we see that by mere definition, nothing could stop such God from creating himself out of nothing, as he is above logic and he can do that.

Atheism has no explanation of existence which excludes God, and that is a crucial point. If all explanations we can think of can logically include God, then in all of them, God is very possible. This is also true for random creation, which could logically create God out of nothing at random in the same way it created our universe out of nothing at random. This is true for eternal universe which does not rule out eternal God, but in fact says unconditional existence is possible, and as such, unconditional existence of God is possible.

So if atheist were to say that God doesnt exist, he would need to explain which condition prevents God from existing while at the same time enabling whole universe to exist.

And more importantly, what put such condition in place?

Atheism can only rule out God from existence if it assumes that there is a specific condition which prevents God from existing.

However, no such condition exists as theory. The idea that things can unconditionally exist enables God directly, and the idea that things cant unconditionally exist would make our own existence impossible, as our existence depends on something which governs existence, and something which governs existence cannot itself be dependent on existence of other things, as it governs them.

So we begin from a true dichotomy:

P1. Some things either can exist unconditionally or things cant exist unconditionally

P2. It is impossible to defend that things cant exist unconditionally

C. Some things can exist unconditionally

P1 is a true tautology, no 3rd option exists.

P2 is true because if all things were conditional, there would be no unconditional thing to enable all of them, and existence itself would be impossible with no possible starting point.

C. From P1 and P2, conclusion follows that some things indeed can exist unconditionally.

This unconditional existence cannot possibly exclude God, as excluding God would make it be conditional.

In this sense, any theory of existence includes God at starting point, because it is impossible to exclude God at starting point.

Also, it is not logically possible to explain why God wouldnt exist at starting point and something else would, as no conditions exist to create such difference.

Because of this, starting point must indeed include God.

It helps me to distance myself from them. I see poor people as someone who would exploit me for my wealth if I got friendly with them.

I hate poverty, and they represent it.

Why is it logical to assert God is self-evident

If atheists can assert laws of logic as self-evident, their senses as self-evident, their reasoning as self-evident, their definitions as self-evident, their starting premises as self-evident, then surely me accepting God as not only self-evident but also an explanation for logic, reasoning, senses, definitions and starting premises, surely I am the only one with an explanation then, while atheists work with no explanation for their core beliefs. In the same way when I say there is a creator of logic and atheist says there isnt, atheist is merely conceding to having no explanation. All definitions are either circular or undefined, and this is true in atheist world where atheist has no starting point of his reasoning, because his reasoning lacks the creator as starting point. This isnt any complicated philosophy. I simply know where is beginning, and atheist doesnt.

Atheists have a different explanation for creation like the Big Bang and don’t accept the God as described in religion as the creator.

The problem with such explanation is that big bang isnt mutually exclusive with God.

If peace is absence of war, then yes, absence of war is peace.

Atheism is a position which suffers from true uncertainty principle, where percentages of possibility are known.

1. Existence is created by creator God (God 100% exists in this option)

2. Existence is explained by non-God (God can still exist)

This true uncertainty principle puts the probability of God existing at above 50%, as in option 1, God exists 100% and in option 2, existence of God is above 0% in chance, placing average of all above 50%.

So to put it simply, atheism is a delusion which gets destroyed by anyone who understands uncertainty principle.

So to put it logically:

1. God is independent creator

2. Existence of independent creator is not dependent on anything

3. God is not dependent on anything

So asking evidence for God assumes that God's existence is dependent on evidence, which contradicts with definition of God as independent creator.

So obviously, independent creator would not be dependent on anything.

Is independent creator logically necessary?

Yes, creation requires creator which cannot himself depend on creation.

Creator would logically be either eternal either himself born out of randomness.

The main problem with atheist world view is in its limited options for explaining existence:

1. Existence requires creator

2. Existence doesnt require creator

If we assume 2, then we must logically assume that existence is not limited by anything, and then the 2 proves God as much as 1 does, because if things can and do exist as independent, what would prevent God from existing?

In this sense, truly, if atheist holds position that universe is eternal, he admits that things can exist as independent. And this means God can exist as independent. So atheist has no explanation why eternal universe would exist and eternal God wouldnt.

In other words, God doesnt require proof because God is the source of proof for a believer. Believer starts with God as a premise, where atheist demands God as conclusion. So the atheist has it backwards, because God is a premise of everything, not conclusion. God is not dependent on something, but everything is dependent on God and truly, every premise of existence of creation, random or pattern, leads to God as its source.

First we must understand what atheist thinking is.

Atheist doesnt believe in God because "there is no evidence for God".

Believer believes in God even when he/she cant show any evidence to others.

That is the simple difference. To a believer, God is truth which requires no evidence, because God itself is the eternal ultimate creator, and he cannot be created or understood, so asking for proof for God is irrational.

And if you find solace in spells, that's beneficial too.

Its not about finding any "solace", but atheist mind truly wouldnt know.

I dont believe in simplicity, I just cant find some plants in my area. Thats all. I believe in complicated, not simple.

Its nothing personal.

Ok, so when I look at spells, people use like 20 different herbs which would take me eternity to find, some dont even grow in my country.

But I realized, I got it backwards.

I was searching for spells using herbs in general.

What I was supposed to be searching is specifically herbs in my area, and their magical properties.

"Magical uses of stinging nettle"

Stinging nettle I can find easily anywhere, dandelion root too. Hazel as well. And these have some magical effects of protection which can be used in personal spells.

Hazel stick has protective properties, and hazel is a tree of wisdom. This is why I really hated when my parents accidentally broke one of small hazel trees growing on land. They are idiots who always had bad luck in life, and I hope they dont send more bad luck my way with their dumb actions.

I didnt know you were super rich. I hate poor people, but rich people I can respect because they are smart and capable.

I think I'm going to date a younger chick

Date asian girl. Those often look young even when 30. Plus, Japanese women have high skills with make up which makes them look cute. But dont date white women. Most of them put no effort in their looks, and by age 40 most are too ugly.

At least you have a farm to survive

Anyone who has some savings in any form can survive crisis easily, if any even happens. Thats what savings are for, when income slows down, they fill the gap. But those without savings better start making some savings and food supplies. Or at least some investments in safe options like gold or desirable land. Not that I think any real crisis is coming in USA. In my country, maybe. In USA? Doubt it.

I'm certain that you are no stranger to "wet dreams".

Average wage under Trump is like over 5000$ and inflation is at lowest. Under Biden, inflation was 6 times higher than it is under Trump.

Did you know that we pay $19.41 billion per month on interest for the National Debt?

So less than 0.1% of budget, and most debt is to itself?

I am sure many among you are having wet dreams about crisis and cant wait for it to happen, but the only crisis which ever happened was under Obama and Biden.

Let me know in september where this crisis is.

If that ever happens

It wont happen. "Experts" predict crisis all the time. With inflation at lowest since forever, the only big crisis which might happen would be in form of difficult decision about if average american will spend extra money on iphone or pixel. My bet is iphone.

China’s economy will outperform America sooner than predicted

No, China's economy is barely half of US economy. And with birth rates among lowest in the world, China wont be outperforming anything. Tho I do appreciate my new cheap phone from China, because I cant afford iphone.

What communists would that be?

If you need me to draw you a map for every claim I make, then our relationship wont work.

We cant meassure IQ accurately, but we can meassure how much person can lift and push.

And my prediction will be right for another 1000 years most likely. If I made this prediction 2000 years ago, I would be right for 2000 years. But its one of those predictions where opposite is so unlikely that its a safe prediction which puts me on level of prophets.