SatanLucy

I dont like relationships because women are boring to talk to. And they do get ugly as they age. 28 year old might look fine now, in about 25 years she will probably look like some old witch from cartoon. Average woman at age 50 is so ugly, its only for men who have no standards.

SatanLucy
Do you think mental states (e.g. beliefs, desires, motives, etc.) play a roll in the causal chain leading to behavior, or are they inert?


I do think mental states cause behavior, but its really just going in circle, because behavior can also cause mental states, especially behavior of others. All of it, however, is logically linked to cause. The believers in free will sadly cannot solve the true dichotomy of pattern and random. Pattern is opposite of random. So in this sense, something can either be in pattern or random. There is truly no 3rd option. Both options, however, when applied to human will, disprove free will. If will follows a pattern, where it is linked to some cause, it cannot be free will. If will is random, it is also not free will, not even will, but just dice roll. I have never seen people disprove this argument, yet this argument makes free will logically impossible to exist.

SatanLucy

I am not saying believers dont get sad, I am just saying atheists get those issues much more and much worse, as proved by every single atheist and low-religious country in history. If you expand your buisness to atheists, you will probably triple the number of customers.

SatanLucy

I hold the view of complete determinism. In other words, not only does free will not exist, but "your choices" are not your own at all. You cannot possibly choose a different path than the one you will choose, and omniscience vs free will paradox proves that when there is omniscience, choices dont exist but there only exists 1 path and different path cannot be chosen.

SatanLucy

Well, discord is quick chat. Here, its a bit more slower response. Tho I do post here too. I would post more, but I dont want to spam site if people arent interested. I have no much desire to talk religion with atheists here, because I gain nothing from it. Atheists at best can be converted to atheistic Satanism, and thats about it. I dont have great interest in listening people mock my religion and pretend that their atheism is any good. There are obviously bunch of people here who base their atheism on anti-religion, because while religion has values, atheism itself was always an anti-value. Atheists truly have no values they share, because the only thing they share is lack of belief, not belief. In this sense, atheism can only be talked about as anti-value, and never a value. So with bunch of atheists here who only care about mocking religion, there is not much to talk about. They cannot be cured from their atheism, and I cannot be made into atheist after being successfully cured from it.

SatanLucy

Just allow it. People who use AI are likely to lose because AI makes such bad arguments sometimes. Personally, I have to instruct AI a lot so it gets somewhat better at its arguments:


Here are three strong arguments as to why AI should be used in debates, based on your provided file and external reasoning:


1. AI Ensures Logical Consistency (A or not A – Prove A)


Argument:

AI operates on strict logical frameworks, meaning it avoids contradictions, hidden premises, and fallacies that often plague human debaters. By adhering to the law of identity (A = A), AI guarantees that arguments presented are internally consistent and verifiable.

Refutation of Opposite View:

Opponents might claim AI cannot understand context or emotion. However, debate is fundamentally about logic and reasoning, not emotional persuasion. Emotions can manipulate but do not validate truth. Thus, rejecting AI for lacking emotion undermines the very purpose of debate—discovering truth.


2. AI Enhances Objectivity and Reduces Bias (Definition Argument – True by Definition)


Argument:

Debates aim to reach conclusions based on reason, not personal bias. AI, by definition, is not influenced by ego, reputation, or emotional bias, making it a more reliable participant in truth-seeking discussions.

Refutation of Opposite View:

The opposing stance assumes human bias is beneficial because it brings “perspective.” But a biased perspective is not inherently truthful—it's subjective. Truth is objective; therefore, a bias-free contributor (AI) aligns more with the purpose of debate than a biased one.


3. AI Expands Knowledge and Analytical Depth (Probability & Limited Options Argument)


Argument:

Debates require analyzing vast information quickly and accurately. Humans are limited by memory, time, and processing capacity. AI can process exponentially more data, making arguments more comprehensive and accurate.

Refutation of Opposite View:

The only alternatives are:

(1) Use humans only – leads to limited knowledge.

(2) Use AI with humans – maximizes both capacity and reasoning.

(3) Reject AI entirely – ignores a superior tool.

Option (2) is clearly superior in probability of producing well-reasoned outcomes, making AI use not only beneficial but necessary.


Do you want me to now rewrite these arguments in the exact format described in your file (A or not A, prove A, prove not not A, expose hidden assumptions)? Or keep them as general debate arguments?


SatanLucy
Though cheese will keep for ages in a refrigerator...Ignore sell by dates and just remove any mouldy edges


Not really. If cheese is good enough, I will eat like 2 pounds of it in a day. If it is bad taste type of cheese, I wont eat it at all. Just put it outside.

SatanLucy

All people are going to betray you given right conditions, this is a fact. Gods, on the other hand, wont.


I think this is why atheists have issues in life. They dont have bond with God. Healthy bonds are necessary for good life, but atheists must rely on bonds with people, and people betray them and atheists end up broken because then there is no one they can trust. Trust issues seem to be mainly atheist problems. Also, when I see person with big depression and complaining, I can 99% guess that they are atheists. I dont think I ever saw a deeply religious person in big depression. Its almost always atheists.

SatanLucy

I only need my savings to last about 15 years, because given my health I probably wont live longer than that. In case I do, I guess I can sell land to add another 15 years of income, but I hate the idea of selling land because I consider it holy and dont want someone building on it.

SatanLucy

Many people keep trying desperately to increase their income, but for me this was impossible as my farm doesnt have ability to produce big income, and my savings would perish quickly if gap between spending and income became too big.


For me, the main way was always reducing costs. If I didnt do that, I couldnt fuction. While I do also seek income increase, reducing costs is another way to have things I want while not running out of money too quickly. Big companies also do cost reduction in terms of reducing number of employees, giving same employees more work, finding cheaper resources and parts...ect.

SatanLucy
Dips don't sound particularly strenuous and therefore not particularly beneficial.


They are for triceps, most important muscle in arm.

SatanLucy

I never had Nintendo DS, yet I played Yugioh World Championship 2008, 2011...ect. on emulator. Fun time. I was even thinking of going back to it, tho those games feel so outdated right now, even tho World Championship 2008 is the most entertaining Yugioh game.

SatanLucy
How can that possibly be true when a human at 5-7 months of age can already recognize a cubists rendition of a human face without the slightest degree of training, and AI is stumped without training?


Thats irrelevant. When I want to know something, I dont ask infant or humans who are clueless about 98% of topics. I ask AI.

SatanLucy

Given that the only workout I do now is dips, I decided to at least try a bit better.


So I downloaded an app which has work out program.


3 times per week work out, 1 day pause between each workout.


One workout has 5 parts. First part you do lets say 13 dips, then pause for 2 minutes, then second part do 11 dips, then pause, then 10 dips, then pause, then 9 dips, then pause, then 8 dips, and thats it for one day.


You dont actually use your whole strength on day 1. For example, I typed that I can do 20 dips maximum at once, and for workout, it recommended what was mentioned before, 13 dips.


Maximum strength is only used once a week. Other 2 times are basically only 60% of strength.


I used to do dips until I cant anymore each time, but this does sound like a better way. 2 times a week use 60% strength, and the 3rd time use 100%.


I typed that I can do 20 dips maximum, but I actually can do about 30 to 40. Stuck on that number as I dont work out regularly but am trying to get back into regular work out and the app might help.