SatanLucy

Lets start from basic definitions.


Hot people are people who all other people want to have sex with.


If a man is hot, and he approaches a woman, she starts wanting him. She cannot not consent because he is hot.


Now lets take into consideration ugly people.

Ugly people are people no one wants to have sex with, really. So they can never get "true consent" because woman will only agree to sex with them if she has no other options. Its like me eating spinach when I want a chocolate. I dont want spinach, and if I had chocolate, I would throw spinach away. In this sense, spinach is like ugly person no one wants to have sex with in a true sense. People just stop resisting because they have no other options.

SatanLucy

You literally cannot think without definitions. It is not possible to make a deductive argument without a definition. If definitions arent agreed to, there is nothing to even debate about. Its like me debating about apples while you debate about oranges.

SatanLucy

there are things true by definition and things which arent true by definition. If a debater fails to establish a priori definition premises, it should count as a loss. there is simply no logical way a debater can lose a debate proved true by definitions, as well as no logical way a debater can win a debate without establishing truth by definition. In simple terms, if debater doesnt win semantics, he has lost a debate because without semantics, nothing is true.

SatanLucy
A specific subset within the community adheres to a "rape pill" ideology, which explicitly advocates for the legalization of rape


that would seriously backfire on them, because it would mean people can rape them too.

SatanLucy
Oh no, did your virtue signalling fail when you got upset about a Muslim Mayor?


USA should elect muslim for president next. Usually, when you dont know what to do, you should do dumbest possible thing.

SatanLucy
What types of rape would you execute someone for and which types would you legalize?


Not paying a prostitute after sex is probably the least decent thing a man can do. Its like... stealing sex. Well, all rape is technically stealing sex, but common, the woman literally sells sex for a living and you just steal it from her?

SatanLucy
You absolutely can remove an individual from a product


Not without committing theft. And as I said, unless you can prove these people got their wealth by stealing, you have no point. Whatever other points you bring up, luck, inheritance...ect. are irrelevant. You get rich in trade only if other people agree to give you their money. There is no luck there. It must be an agreement. Do you oppose trade?

SatanLucy

You literally cant be both incel and a rapist. However, women talk of rape all the time and we are not calling them obsessed with rape. Are incels under some "privileged" status where they become rapists by just talking about rape often enough?

SatanLucy

Have you considered expanding to tik tok? My personal experience is that tik tok is much easier to grow than youtube. On Youtube, took me like 2 years to get 500 subscribers. On tik tok, took me less than 2 months to gain over 1000 followers (follow bunch of people, they follow back). But tik tok is for short videos only, unless you are doing live (which is easy on tik tok).

SatanLucy
Twelve-year-olds can be so fickle.


I am sure she wasnt 12, but you can never know who is on the other side in online relationships. It could easily be some creep or worse, a very unattractive person who deserves no love.

SatanLucy
Wrong, trade depends on how useful the product which they control was to society. Remove the individual, and product remains just as useful


I think this has to be one of most low IQ statements I ever read. You cannot "remove the individual" from his skills and products without committing theft or worse. So again, if people choose to buy my products for billions and make me rich, that is called trade. If you oppose trade, you can say so. Well, you already did.