SatanLucy

The federal workforce is something line 2% of total spending

Which is 150 billion dollars per year. But some services shut down too, which saves more money. I am not saying its a perfect way, but it is the only way to force cutting down expenses. Sometimes you have to be extreme. Alternative is to keep spending high and harm economy because bunch of retards in government oppose every attempt to cut on healthcare and social security. Yes, cutting spending means you lose government services. It must be done, or USA will never become decent to live in. Government services are always more expensive and of lower quality than private services, because YOU PAY for government services through taxes and inflation, and you pay for them in taxes more than their price on private market. Its a socialist scam. Population can only become richer if production increases, and that is only possible in private economy. Harming private economy by trying to fix social issues with other people's money is the characteristic of every failed socialist country out there. Economy is about production, and re-distribution only costs money and produces nothing, and also reduces productive powers.

When I was a kid, life was so simple. I often miss the days when I didnt do overthinking, constant arguments and competitive games. I actually tried playing games I played in childhood, but I dont find them as good anymore. But I still enjoy drawing, even tho now I draw symmetry symbols. I dont like the idea that people change over time, but it is true. You are a different person than you were before. You have different goals and different things make you happy.

I think person is entirely defined by goals. Person is basically set of goals and memories. Once goals change, person becomes different person. I also read that all atoms in body eventually change, so you are literally different person than you were before even if your goals dont change.

Acts 18:6 And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean; from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.

I didnt say your defense of Bible was bad, it was good. It only made Jesus look horrible. So while I consider Jesus as God, I cant accept Bible because it is either a lie either makes Jesus look horrible.

So people can lie about being atheist too.

thats actually a brilliant move by trump. He tried his best to reduce government spending, but then he realized he can just shut down the government and end spending. Its much faster than getting democrats to agree to cut spending. USA already has low spending to GDP, but this move will reduce it further and give big boost to economy. the only disadvantage is that government cant invest in buying means of production anymore.

You only know if a person is an atheist if he says he is

I say I am God. So if you believe everything people say, you must believe this too.

God at trolling.

Yes, there is evidence that atheists exist, as shown by global surveys and studies that report significant percentages of self-identified atheists in populations worldwide

thats not proof of atheism. thats just proof people who say they are atheists exist.

The proof that atheism exists is its existence

So no proof.

Trump wants option for a 3rd term

In terms of economy, he is great. Everything else? Not so much.

So I was in a chat with a guy, and he told me:

"I am an atheist. I dont believe in claims which have no evidence."

And I said: Alright then. "I am an atheist" is a claim. Do you have evidence to support it?

He said: "I just told you I am an atheist!!!"

And I respond: I could tell you that I am God. Do you believe everything people tell you?

In the end, the person couldnt prove that he is an atheist.

So I ask here, can anyone prove to me that atheism exists?

You can’t masturbate and pray to God at the same time

Yes, you can. I think of God all the time because I am a strong believer.

As far as we are able to know, and within the context of our onboard intellectual apparatus, we observe an external reality.

Sounds like unprovable claim.

Do we have evidence that atheists exist?

Here is a fun question for atheists:

Do you lack belief in the non-existence of God?

All Heil the great lord Meowbah! In the name of Meowbah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful: All Praise is due to Meowbah, Lord of the Universe The Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. Owner of the Day of Purr-ification. You alone do we worship, and You alone we turn to for help Guide us to the straight path; The path of those on whom You have bestowed your grace, not the path of those who have earned Your anger, nor of those who went astray. Ameow!

I am a good Meowist!!

Well, you should live to be 95 years old.

Ever since I started high sugar fruit diet, I started becoming younger instead of older.

you really believe in a magical being who lives in the sky?

Yes.

he's going to keep track of how good you are and put you in "heaven" after you die?

Yes.

Are you an idiot?

I hope so.

People believe in this garbage and keep foisting it on humanity for their own selfish reasons.

I am not selfish, I am religious.

There are no upsides to god-belief and never will be

It feels nice to have magic sky daddy care for you.

Is that why you act like a 4 year old according to your profile?

No, its because I am trans age. My mental age is 13 tho, I just act like a 4 year old. My brain is not that of a 4 year old, just the behavior is.

Always begs the question as to why Mary wasn't stoned.

Because God raped Mary. She had no choice.

But why wasn't God stoned for committing adultery? Oh nevermind, he was crucified instead.

Sadly for atheists, this theory is bulletproof. Atheist believes his eyes show him what exists, but that could very well be illusion. If atheist can believe in things without proof, what objection does he have when accusing believer of same?

Though by your logical standards, if it is possible to observe a banana then a pink fluffykins must also exist. Or neither exists.

If things exist, then there is also a thing which determines what exists and what doesnt. Such thing is God - Ruler of existence.

If there is no thing which determines what exists and what doesnt, then either everything exists or nothing does.

But truly, one cannot prove the "observed = exists" claim.

Completeness theorem when applied to arguments talks specifically of these things:

1. First-order logic (Such as "A = A" and "A = / = Not A", and False: A = Not A)
2. Definitions
3. Deduction logic
4. Necessary true (A = B)
5. Logically limited options (A or Not A)
6. Necessary false (A = / = B)
7. true and false being mutually exclusive (A and Not A cannot both be true and cannot both be false)

First-order logic must be accepted to be able to do reasoning. Some definitions likewise must be accepted or it is not possible to do any reasoning. Deduction logic is the result of first order logic and definitions. "Necessary true" is what must be true by deduction logic and first order logic and definitions. Logically limited options (A or Not A) means other options arent logically possible because there is no 3rd option with A or Not A. "Necessary false" is what must be false because it violates deduction logic and first order logic and definitions. true and false being mutually exclusive is result of first order logic where it is not possible to conclude differently without stating "A = Not A".

Now, how does observation evidence fail by completeness theorem?

Because observation evidence makes a claim which it cannot prove by deductive logic.

Observed = Exists

Observed = true

Something is observed = true

One way in which observation evidence attempted to prove itself is by defining "Exists" as "observed" and defining "true" as "observed", or in a better case, adding "observed" as one of definitions of "true" and "exists".

So in this case, observed would be by definition something which exists.

Obvious problem, however, is that such solution attempts to define something as existing. If such solution were accepted as valid, then I could likewise say "God is defined as supernatural being which exists", or "definition of "Exists" includes "God"".

So logical proof for observation evidence is about as strong as evidence for God. In other words, either God and observations exist, or neither exist.

So person who believes in what they can observe would also logically have to believe in God, because it is not possible to define one as existing and the other not, without creating arbitrary difference which fails by lack of justification.

Are you admitting your debates are not intelligent enough for A.I. to understand?

When someone has 360 IQ, of course someone with mere 140 IQ cant understand IQ above 140. Its a curse of very smart people. the smarter you are, the lower is the number of people who can understand you. When an adult talks about high level math with a 4 year old, the 4 year old remains clueless and cant understand. And when compared to my intelligence, everyone else is a 4 year old.

Since you take such pride in being a weirdo, I would think you would take it as a compliment.

I dont take pride in being a weirdo. I dont even consider myself weird.

Law required the adulterous man and woman to be stoned. They only brought the woman

So Jesus wanted to stone 2 people instead of 1?

I see no proof for that but damn... you guys are really trying to make Jesus look horrible. So I must still reject the Bible because I refuse to believe Jesus is so evil.

I believe Jesus Christ is God, but not as described in the Bible.

Lets see.

God in Old testament says: "Any woman who commits adultery is to be put to death". (No exception mentioned)

So Jesus comes, and he sees a bunch of men trying to stone a woman for adultery.

Jesus says: "Leave the woman alone, you misogynistic fuckers!!!"

So if Jesus is same God from Old testament, then only two options are possible:

1. He somehow forgot to mention exceptions in Old testament
2. He changed his mind

Now, 2 gets a common objection from the verse "God doesnt change his mind". But God can change his mind about that verse too, so that verse is invalid.

1 would basically mean God in Old testament gave people an incomplete law which led them to killing women which they actually werent supposed to kill.

But what is a far more likely explanation is that Jesus is not God from Old testament. If we accept that people misinterpreted religion for 4000 years before Jesus came, there is not much hope that they wouldnt misinterpret it for 2000 years after Jesus.

So Jesus was God who came to Earth to CHANGE religion, but writers of New testament confused him for God of the Old testament.

this is why they made up a story about God being killed on cross, which makes no sense because God cant be killed unless he wants to die anyway and basically just self-destructs.

But I dont know why would Christians want to believe in the story that Jesus committed suicide, or at least tried to but he cant die anyway because he is God.

So they made up a story how Jesus "sacrificed himself" for them. But what exactly did Jesus sacrifice? He didnt die. He didn't lose anything except maybe a weekend which he could have spent elsewhere.

So Jesus was God, but Bible is clearly false. No person above 150 IQ can seriously believe the nonsense Bible teaches.

Also, Bible is literally polytheist because it teaches that there are 3 Gods, or that 1 God has 3 minds which is same as saying there are 3 Gods.

The hole is filled by God

Each time I pray to God, I can feel my hole being filled. But I do masturbate and pray at the same time, not sure if other people do that.

I wouldn't recommend using AI to understand my arguments. It usually takes 2 or 3 additional explanations for AI to understand me.