SatanLucy

I could write like 5000 of these about Trump.

But it's too much spamming.

Are we excluding government jobs....postal service, police, military, fire, etc?

Yes, government profits from them.

If there is no profit, no one will invest or give person a job. If profit is lost at workplace, then those with money will simply invest in non-workplace investments, such as trade and gold.

I always wanted to confess my greatest sin because I was feeling so guilty about it.

So your argument against new way of energy is... Majority doesn't want it?

Of course majority doesn't want it. If they wanted it, we would already be there.

Are you RM's alt?

Common sense doesn't solve munchausen trilemma, nor incompleteness theorem, and it definitely doesn't solve problem of unavoidable circularity in all truth determining systems.

The only question is which circular logic one follows. It is no longer a question of who makes more logical sense, because no one does.

You know what, Hitler was FIGHTING THE PATRIARCHY

"Woman needs to be cute, stupid, pretty little thing." - Hitler

The problem with truth is that it requires a truth determining system to be established, and any such system suffers from circular reasoning where system says that system is true, creating unresolvable problem. So even if truth exists, no system can determine it without relying on circular reasoning, and if circular reasoning is true, then anything can be true, producing contradiction.

I thought you gave up on the idea of truth

I did, truth is self contradicting.

Truth frees us from a false narrative.

If we were going to allow AI generated RFDs then we may as well just institute an AI bot that judges debates automatically once the debate ends.

It sounds interesting as a debate option, but definitely terrible if applied to all debates. Also, I don't really see point in AI votes. The whole point of voting is to make effort to become better voter. Using AI isn't just cheating by making voter's job a lot shorter. It also reduces voter's skills.

Part 11???

How many parts are there to this?

Though I may argue that it should take only "one" of the contenders to request AI.

No, its both or no AI.

I dont see why I should have my debate be pooped by AI just because opponent requests it. Otherwise, I would just make rule in debate of no AI voting at all.

But would you not say that in the instance that there are no voters, on the last day, AI would be better than no voters at-all?

If debaters agree, sure. I don't think debater who doesn't want AI voting on his debate should be forced to have it.

it should be only allowed on debates which say AI voting is allowed. Otherwise, its removed by default. Because AI isnt a good voter nor a good debater, we generally dont need it.

The issue isn't that we have different beliefs regarding what acceptable behavior looks like, it's that many (like Fauxlaw here) determine whether behavior is acceptable based on whether the individual engaging in it has a D or an R next to their name. That's a totally different thing.

Loyalty does wonders. World is based on loyalty. Anyone is more likely to turn a blind eye for person they like.

Why do Rs need to ditch Trump?

Other than being convicted felon, rapist, pussy grabber, serial liar, pervert, pedophile, war criminal and having stolen from charity, he is a great guy.

Rapist, convicted felon, and pedophile walk into a bar. Bartender says "What can I get for you, mister president?"

A baby born without eyes is diagnosed with anophthalmia. It occurs when the eye tissue and optic nerves fail to develop in the womb, most commonly due to genetic mutations, chromosomal abnormalities, or prenatal factors.

I guess this shows that God is not all powerful.

Quite the opposite. It shows God has power to not just create babies with eyes, but also babies without eyes. God can do anything.

"not everything taught in Sunday School is true. "

Unproved claim.

thats actually pretty cool

When we apply it to country level, its pretty much guaranteed that countries where abortion is popular are gonna struggle severely with birth rates, and that makes everything else difficult for a country. Some countries do manage the issue by importing migrants, however not all countries can or want to do that.

Abortions are almost always more expensive for a country than births, because while birth means more population, abortion doesnt give anything useful to a country and even causes harm by reducing young population specifically in ratio to old population.

So countries where abortion is popular pretty much gotta fight over who gets migrants, because they cannot maintain their population otherwise.

All else equal, country with low birth rates is always gonna be at a disadvantage in pretty much all areas, economy or military, because both of these require population to grow. Factory which lacks workers is gonna struggle to keep up production. Military with low number of joining members is gonna struggle to maintain numbers.

Popular argument is that less population = more resources per person, but that actually isnt true because there are also less resources produced when there is lower population, and economy of scale drops rapidly with worker shortages, and number of innovators pretty much drops with population drop, and tax becomes more difficult to collect when there are less people, and number of old people growing in ratio pretty much guarantees that existing young population is drained more to sustain them.

the only question now is how far can birth rates drop, or how long can they remain low, before country experiences severe consequences economically.

Is it going to be a slow economical death of a country? I have severe doubts that economy with reducing population can manage well.

I see that the time is either 11.56 or 23.56

It's neither. That Rolex watch shows around 2 or 3 o'clock.

If I am allowed to use AI, it's gonna be a very easy debate, I guess. Tho I assume you are using a premium model of AI, so you got the advantage there, I guess.

I am demon and I have mental health issues, so I dont know if exorcism will work.

Hi, my girl

I am sure there are still 1 billion people dumb enough to follow cat-alcoholic church.

I realized that it doesnt matter how stupid or evil one religion or teaching is, there are always even dumber people to follow it.

Even Hitler was loved by millions.

It doesnt matter how stupid or evil something is. there is always someone dumb enough to follow it to the death.

I just dont know why Gods cursed me to live on same planet as these foids, moids and averages. I must have done some terrible sin in past life for Gods to curse me in this way.

I draw a lot, used to write too, but less now. Now I mostly draw.

Here is a complete pen collection.