SatanLucy

That's just problem of population growth surpassing resources growth.

It was bound to happen eventually. You can't have infinite population on a planet with finite resources.

Eventually, those resources reduce per capita.

But the reason why kids are expensive is because society raised the cost of raising kids.

One kid gets more things now than at any previous point in history.

Look no further, one is still the President of the USA

That's an insult. No way I am as dumb as president of USA.

Here's my tip... dont eat yellow snow

Why not?

No tip?

generally talks more or less non-sense, though will occasionally astound with an outburst of rationality

My brain achieved the random chaos form. It just keeps producing words, and most of those words are bullshit, and some even make sense.

refuse to help their biggest ally annex Canada.

I mean, how would Jews even help there?

Yeah, Trump lost badly. Too bad he is still president.

Actually, my chatbot is very much complete. Whats left is some small improvements. But so far what seems to work best is 4 to 5 word groups generation with descending 2, 1, 0 of shared words.

Here is what it produced:

"Deductive analysis clarifies methodical testing of a deductive argument is only as strong as its weakest premise, meaning the most efficient way to defeat a deductive argument comes entirely from its premises by the structure of the argument alone, not from the quantity or quality of observed argumentation encourages balanced evaluation of counterarguments. Deductive argumentation tests transparent reasoning structures. your conclusion, the debate is over in your favor by pure deductive logic, making it immune to empirical counterexample and defeating any opponent who relies on clearly defined terms. when assumptions remain hidden. analysis develops clear definitions and consistent application of..."

Whats interesting is that this entire line of text doesnt appear in original text in this way. The generation produces entirely new sentences. And while using 2 shared words improves grammatical structure greatly, problem there is that then the number of combinations reduce. So I chose descending 2, 1, 0, of shared words.

You're right, but nobody deserves unconditional love; not even your wife, husband, or kids.

Unconditional love is universal love. It is Amor Fati. If it were conditioned to specific person, it would be conditional love.

If you love someone for being your offspring, it means you wouldn't love that same someone if he wasn't your offspring.

Unconditional love cannot pick and choose. Picking and choosing are conditions, not lack of.

Unconditional love is better than conditional love. The latter has an expiration date.

If you become Meowist, your faith in Meowbah cannot be conditional.

The Infinite Monkey Theorem:

It states that a monkey randomly hitting keys on a typewriter for an infinite amount of time would almost certainly eventually produce any particular text, even Shakespeare's complete works.

This theory is basically saying that random generation, given enough time, can produce anything which is possible to produce with its basic parts combinations.

It is also reason why endless random generator with no intelligence whatsoever could eventually produce universe with intelligence and perfect design.

So I thought, why not make a chatbot based on that theorem?

Obviously, making a program which just creates random combinations of letters would take quite a long time to produce anything coherent.

So using letters as basic parts is pretty much not practical.

However, using words instantly boosts coherence because at least the program is writing coherent words, irrelevant of if their combination is incoherent.

Further, those words would of course have to be on topic of input, so randomness further must be bound to generate only words found in sentences relevant to input.

After applying this, chatbot became more coherent, tho it's flow of words was still more or less bad.

Then I got another idea. Why use words as basic parts? Better to use groups of words.

So I tested a program which takes all 5 word combinations from text, and then does random generation of series of 5 word combinations it learned.

This has improved coherence, but sometimes the flow from one 5 word group to another wasn't good.

To improve the flow, I decided to bound randomness further.

So I set it to only use next 5 word group which has same first word as last word of previous group.

So if two groups are:

"cat plays and drinks milk"

"milk while thinking of mouse"

The chatbot combines these word groups into one, while avoiding to repeat "milk" twice, so final output becomes:

"cat plays and drinks milk while thinking of mouse"

This greatly improved flow of text in a random generation.

Of course, one can improve it even more by using 2 or 3 shared words instead of one.

This basically guaranteed that bound randomness generation produces coherent text.

Bound randomness is of course superior to complete randomness, because bound randomness follows rules and goals to produce more of desirable results.

It is true that full randomness eventually does produce a desirable output. Bound randomness just makes it quicker.

Of course, this chatbot has no intelligence. It is merely a bound randomness generator. It's answers may seem smart sometimes, but it doesn't "think". It merely does random generation according to rules.

You can invent whatever name you’d like, the rest of the world refers to it as “logic”, as in the foundational tool of science.

No, Meow-logic isnt logic. Logic is a failure, and so is science. Meow-logic is more the area of magic.

ritual circumcision is a perverse sexually inspired act of child abuse.

Circumcisers are turned on by penis torture of infants.

If Person A was my best friend for 30 years throughout school and I find out he's accused of abusing a woman, then I'm not just going to stick up for him no matter what and claim he's innocent.

So your friendship is conditional.

I accepted your debate - we can hash it out there. 😃

Debate wasn't about circumcisers. It was about gulags. I was considering how should government punish circumcisers. Obviously, they should not be given a fair trial or even a lawyer. Government could give them death penalty instantly, but then the government doesn't profit. So I realized gulags were probably a better option.

Meh. It not about being nicer, its about what works better. Force addresses actions in the short term, but not the underlying ignorance, ideology, etc. Force will never eradicate circumcision.

Not just force. Don't forget the gulags and entire property taken. State needs to profit.

I think government taking all money and property from criminals is a great way for government to reduce budget deficit. Tho this doesn't mean criminals walk free. No, they should still be sent to gulags to work as slaves to increase government revenue further.

Actually, I changed my mind. I think death penalty is too mild for circumcisers and doesn't benefit the government. The proper legal punishment for circumcisers is government taking all their money and property. That way, the government profits, and increases budget revenue.

I dont think it is necessary to penalize. As much as I disapprove of the procedure, there should be exceptions and it should ultimately be up to the parent or of-age patient

You are a much nicer person than I am. Like, much much nicer.

Small correction:

I am not spawn of Satan. I am Satan Meowist Taoist Venus worshipper.

Everybody knows that Jews and Blacks are people

I mean, everybody knows?

"Jews are definitely a race, but they are not human race." - Adolf Hitler

Seems that Hitler didn't know.

Given the way game developers are going, future games are gonna look like real world except there won't be any gameplay cuz all money went to making graphics.

Hey, that's your username.

Personally, I would introduce death penalty for circumcision, but I guess 500$ fine is a solid deterrent for poor people.

Circumcision is kinda weird too. Maybe we could just stop the entire practice?

This is an anti semitic comment. You basically agreed with Hitler. He wanted to stop the circumcision too. Why do you agree with Hitler?

I also want to add one more thing: the "bow vs early rifle" scenario applied to AI.

When rifles first appeared, they were much inferior to bows. In a 1 vs 1 battle, skilled archer would always beat skilled rifleman.

So how did early rifles then win battles?

Because to train a skilled archer took 25 years, where to train skilled rifleman took only 1 day. Riflemen became much greater in numbers, and skilled archers couldnt make up for numbers difference.

This scenario, to an even greater degree, applies to AI vs skilled human worker.

To train a skilled human worker, it takes 25 years.

To reproduce a skilled AI model takes few seconds, only as much time as it takes to click on model and click "copy".

AI can produce skilled workers at much greater rate than humans can.

Anyone who supports Trump at this point must be either brain dead or somehow profiting from Trump's moves. There is no way that average person thinks "This guy is so great for me", unless the average person is retarded and cant tell even what obvious lies are.

Thats exactly the problem AI doom scenario talks about.

Humans depend on AI, so AI has the upper hand from start. Once invented, it cannot be un-invented. Humans become dependent on it, and AI grows more and more until one day it decides that humans are negatively affecting AI growth.

Politics in USA was dead long time ago, For over 100 years, electing two same parties over and over, all while both of those parties become increasingly radical over time. MAGA movement is pretty much dead at this point, but dont expect that the coming victory of democrats is gonna be any better.