SatanLucy
Polyamory exists. LGTBQ+ couples exist


That's why I said "when we exclude those". Also, those are still irrelevant. If women have standards which exclude many men, it still means many straight men will be lonely, and then also many women unless they share desirable men.


You simply can't have excluding standards without excluding anyone.



are likely single because they want to be


We are not dealing with what is likely. That is literally irrelevant to point. It's like me saying 1 out of 10 men can't get a relationship, and you respond with "most can". It is irrelevant to what I said.



That's...somehow even more disturbing. Are you willing to go on record saying that a romantic relationship between someone who is over 18 and someone who is under 18 is socially acceptable so long as it's asexual?


I never said anything about being socially acceptable.


I said it isn't worthy to even seek such relationships.

SatanLucy

And again, I am not a misogynist.


I think women should have a choice in life to live as they want.


I just see them only being useful to society as baby factories.


But if a woman doesn't want to be a mother, fine, she can get education instead or even a job.


It is of course bad for society when women choose to stop being baby factories, but I can't really say society itself is any good, so maybe women who refuse to be mothers are correct.


So I am not a misogynist. I am merely neutral on the question of what is a role of woman in society, to be a mother or to just be whatever she wants to be or whatever boss at job tells her to be.

SatanLucy
The entire premise is resting on a false dichotomy


It's not really a false dichotomy.


If there are 10 women and 10 men, either each woman gets one man, or someone is left alone.


Gay relationships don't affect this because gays are small percentage of society.


Waiting until 30 means a significant portion of men are left alone until 30 as well, but this doesn't even negate that standards women use still excludes men, irrelevant what age they start dating.



You spam a bunch of links which have no any relevance to my argument. I don't see a point in responding to them.



I'd ask you what the youngest you'd date, but I'm not sure I want to know the answer to that


The youngest I would date is 18, because women aren't worthy to go to prison for.


If I was dating younger than 18, I would be lying that she is worthy of years in prison, which she is really not.


The only way not to go to prison when dating under 18 is if you don't do anything sexual, and then you are basically just friends and it isn't even dating.

SatanLucy
I'd link you the required pages that show that older women lovers are eating good


I think you are actually confused about standards in a lot of men. Performance itself doesnt matter. Men dont actually prefer woman doing anything. In fact, its the looks which matter. Actions dont matter, not even sexual actions. Once you are 60, men wont be interested in you probably in most cases, irrelevant of what actions you can perform. Because its all about looks, not actions.

SatanLucy
Not to mention your entire argument excludes the whole concept of LGBTQ+ relationships.


Irrelevant small percentage of society.




In many nations, a trend can be observed of people waiting longer until they marry. In such countries as Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Luxembourg, Ireland, and Estonia, the average marriage age is over 30.


Yeah, but if you wait until 30, you will be lonely until 30, and so will your potential boyfriend.


And older women over 30 actually also experience a lot of loneliness because they expired. I personally wouldnt date woman over age 25 because thats just too old.

SatanLucy

the ratio of men to women is about 1:1.


So yes, in society without polygamy, women can either accept all men or they can remain single.


But women have a further disadvantage because they prefer older men, and men generally prefer women under the age 25.


So when women start setting "standards" to exclude some men, they are merely guaranteeing a significant portion of women remains lonely as well.


Because if there are 10 men and 10 women, if 10 women make standard to exclude 50% of men, then 10 women are competing for 5 men.


And if woman keeps waiting and competing, she expires at age 25.

SatanLucy

the ratio of men to women is about 1:1.


So yes, in society without polygamy, women can either accept all men or they can remain single.


But women have a further disadvantage because they prefer older men, and men generally prefer women under the age 25.


So when women start setting "standards" to exclude some men, they are merely guaranteeing a significant portion of women remains lonely as well.


Because if there are 10 men and 10 women, if 10 women make standard to exclude 50% of men, then 10 women are competing for 5 men.


And if woman keeps waiting and competing, she expires at age 25.

SatanLucy
Most elo farmers on the previous site were contenders accepting debates from noobs who had written poor descriptions


Being Con also helps with having last word, which in debates with under 3 rounds is deadly, and as Novice demonstrated, if you forfeit a middle round, you effectively turn 3 round debate into 2 round debate.


Anyway, cheating is point of these debates. the main point of formal debate is to exploit a weakness in topic which opponent didnt notice.


there are truly no balanced topics when burden of proof is on Pro.


Pro either establishes a strong position from start by definitions and topic, or he loses to competent debaters who accept as Con and exploit weakness in position.


What people seem to want here is to take away Pro's advantage in making start position, without realizing that would give a lot of advantage to Con.


Con already has enough advantage of first being able to not accept debate in first place, being able to have last word, and being able to exploit any undefined words, or contradictions with definitions.


In fact, being always Con and waiting for debates with weakest structure is probably best way to increase rating, and Novice did that a lot but he eventually screwed up because debates arent always predictable, and sometimes Pro turns out stronger than expected.


And as I said before, Pro doesnt really have big advantage in setting structure in debate, for two reasons:


One, definitions in description can be challenged.


Voters often accept challenge of definitions, even if those definitions are in description. So Pro must make sure his definitions are also from dictionary.


Problem two, Pro must make debate topic be able to be challenged, or no one will accept.


Sure, I can make a debate topic where I say "1 plus 1 is two", and I define "two" as "1 plus 1", but who will accept? No one.


So Pro doesnt actually have any advantage, because any debate structure Pro makes must first be approved by Con for debate to start.

SatanLucy

March 13 (Reuters) - Five U.S. Air Force refueling planes ​were struck and ‌damaged on the ground at Prince Sultan ​air base in ​Saudi Arabia, the Wall ⁠Street Journal reported ​on Friday, citing two ​U.S. officials.



https://www.reuters.com/world/five-us-air-force-refueling-planes-hit-iranian-strike-saudi-arabia-wsj-reports-2026-03-13/

SatanLucy

https://youtu.be/jdFpsib08Mc?si=FG9j5MCNsMPaOff8



Israel released video of Benjamin Bibi.


Problem?


Video is generated by AI, Bibi has 6 fingers (common mistake in AI video making).


If real Bibi still exists, why Israel needs AI to make Bibi?



USA killed Ayatollah at start of war.


Many people thank USA for killing Ayatollah.


Previous Ayatollah wanted peace and lack of escalation.


Now Iran has a new more advanced Ayatollah who wants more escalation.


I say more advanced Ayatollah, because new Ayatollah is younger and more capable.



trump is experiencing brain damage because trump only sleeps 4 hours a day. this causes more miscalculations.



trump claimed Iran's navy is destroyed, which is not true. Iran's navy still places mines and intercepts oil ships


Iran has lost less than 0,1 % of his troops. As US admitted, US target mapping system is outdated, and US doesnt even know what it is hitting, which is why it confused school for military base.



Iran lost less than 0,1% of its troops, but has destroyed 15% of world oil production in just one week. It is predicted it can destroy 40% of world oil in next 3 weeks, and at that point, US economy is likely to collapse, as well as economy of Europe.


Only 20% of Americans support trump's war.


80% of Americans oppose trump's war, which is a surprise that majority in USA is making a rational decision for a change.

SatanLucy
they got ashamed


they got more than ashamed, but yes, point of psychological warfare is to hurt the mind. Maybe if they had more offspring, the pain would be less, but I am their only offspring. And they wont have grandchildren either. So all they are left with in life is disappointment.



Well, you lose that psychological warfare because while they got ashamed, they disowned you, you got treated worse than murderer in prison, and you have talked about wanting to commit suicide openly on a platform.


Every war has a price. If you are not ready to pay price, you cant fight war.

SatanLucy
This is because you're a pedophile; not because you were hit as a kid.


Maybe if I was treated better as a kid by my parents, I wouldnt have to ruin my parent's lives by telling them I am a pedophile. Its all about psychological warfare. It is advanced type of warfare which I happen to be an expert in, and there is no counter against it. Same with magical warfare, which I am also great at.

SatanLucy

In order to understand statistics, you must first understand what counts as abuse, its consequences, and then make statistics.


Because statistics on abuse are mostly self-report surveys, but we see that plenty of people self-report negative things about their parents when asked about it.


For example, in Japan, a lot of people will say their parents are strict on education.



Yes, many Japanese parents are strict regarding education

, largely due to high-stakes entrance exams and a cultural emphasis on discipline and conformity. Parents are often heavily involved in monitoring academic progress and often send their children to cram schools (juku) to prepare for competitive high school and university admissions. 


Key Aspects of Strictness in Japan's Education:


  1. Entrance Exam Pressure: The competition for top schools is intense, causing parents to start academic preparation early.
  2. Cram School (Juku): Parents often send children to after-school, evening classes to ensure they keep up or get ahead, as noted in a Reddit post.
  3. Discipline and Conformity: Parents teach children to show respect and conform to rules, aligning with the mindset that "the nail that sticks out gets hammered down".
  4. High Expectations: Strictness often focuses on developing a "strong and tough mind" to handle setbacks, according to a Quora post.
  5. School Rules: Schools themselves are strict, enforcing codes for hair, dress, and behavior, often supported by parents, according to a Reddit post and a smapse.com article. 




the result of this overfocus on education are failing social skills and highest suicide rates in the world.


As I said, any area where abuse is allowed is where abuse will happen. And days with highest number of suicides among kids in Japan are days before school starts.


SatanLucy

Parents by default abuse children. that is just how it is. Government can either stop it or let it happen, and letting it happen ruins society in long run. We see in all countries that any area open for abuse will be abused. In Japan, parents abuse kids by too much focus on studying, effectively ruining their mental health and social skills. Because any area left unprotected will be attacked.

SatanLucy

I dont agree with any censorship, because anything person says can be countered by message on mass scale. the only ones who need censorship are the ones incapable of defeating an argument in the first place.


And I dont care for kids cursing. Cursing is beneficial for brain.

SatanLucy

Some people here also asked "What makes a man pedophile?"


A man becomes a pedophile because that is conditioned result of woman's preference. Women always seek older partners. this means a man at age 18 fails to find a girlfriend of his age, because all the girls his age prefer men over 19. this essentially forces a lot of 18 year old men to either be alone or date someone under 18.


the math behind this is that if only 40% of 18 year old girls choose men over 19, it means 40% of 18 year old guys face a choice of being lonely or date women under 18.


When we combine this with obesity rates, it means that 40% of women are fat, leaving only 60% of women, and out of those 60% of women, 50% are not interested in guys their own age, leaving essentially only 20% to 30% of total women of age 18 for all men of age 18. And this is before we include the rates of women who are not fat but are ugly.

SatanLucy
ell, in America, 'really don't like giving the government too much control over how they raise their kids I think.



Actually, before government took control, US parents were marrying their kids at age 9, and child labor was everywhere.


So yes, the only people who argue for full parent freedom are those who didnt read what happened in 1750 to 1900 when parent freedom was greater.

SatanLucy
Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease, maybe.


Nothing is worse than bad parenting which produces most of problems in society.


While exact way how to deal with bad parenting is questionable, the main issue is that society isnt dealing with it much at all, but even justifying more of bad parenting, and doing more of bad parenting.

SatanLucy
What makes a man become a pedophile?



A man becomes a pedophile because that is woman's preference. Women always seek older partners. this means a man at age 18 fails to find a girlfriend of his age, because all the girls his age prefer men over 19. this essentially forces an 18 year old to either be alone or date someone under 18.


the math behind this is that if only 40% of 18 year old girls choose men over 19, it means 40% of 18 year old guys face a choice of being lonely or date women under 18.