SatanLucy

Approximately

41% to 42% of adult women in the USA are considered obese, based on data from 2017-2023. With over two-thirds of women over age 20 having overweight or obesity, this equates to tens of millions of individuals, with higher prevalence rates observed among Black and Hispanic women. 


  1. Prevalence: Studies from August 2021–August 2023 found that the obesity rate among women was 41.3% to 41.4%.
  2. Trend: Obesity prevalence among U.S. women has risen significantly, from 25.4% in 1988-1994 to over 41% in 2017-2018.



the reason why being gay is on the rise in USA is because women in USA are becoming uglier and uglier. Almost every second woman is fat.


this means that even when we dont take into account any other beauty factor, almost 50% of US women are unattractive by default.


this on its own leaves about 50% of men lacking in any available attractive women, causing them to increasingly find comfort in each other's arms.


Further, because 80% of women (even ugly ones) chase about 20% of men, male loneliness is on the rise.



Yes, male loneliness is rising

, frequently described as an epidemic. Since 1990, the share of U.S. men with no close friends has quintupled to 15%, with young men (18-23) experiencing the steepest declines, often reporting that "no one really knows me". This crisis is linked to declining marriage rates, fewer friendships, and emotional stoicism. 


Key Data on the Rise of Male Loneliness:


  1. Shrinking Friendships: Only 27% of men have six or more close friends, down from 55% in 1995, as reported by The Survey Center on American Life.
  2. The "No Friends" Crisis: Around 15% of men report having no close friends at all, a figure that has increased significantly over the past three decades.
  3. Young Men Particularly Affected: A survey found that 1 in 4 young men (under 30) reports feeling lonely "a lot of the day".
  4. Lack of Emotional Support: Research from Equimundo shows that a majority of men feel they have only one or two people they can confide in, or none at all. 




In prisons, lack of women for males causes many to turn gay. And now, in USA, 50% of men by default cant have any attractive woman.


Being gay is on the rise because it is a logical choice of a man surrounded by fat women, and this is even when we dont take into account the non-fat but ugly or expired ones (women over 25 age).

SatanLucy

I never really understood people who keep defending bad parents. Bad parents are main reason why next generation becomes worse.


But because we live in world where 95% of people are retarded, and the remaining 5% dont have any real power, we end up with result where world is ran by retards and future generations are raised by mentally ill population.


When you see some retarded person punching himself, that is actually the image of entire world as it is now.


But people who dont have smart brains cant figure out causation process where:

Person X does A, A causes B, B causes C, C causes harm to person X.


Because people with small brains are only capable of seeing most obvious, and completely incapable of seeing any wide distance causation chain, these people are like retards who punch themselves using wide distance causation chain, and then wondering why they were punched.


Wide distance causation chain is actually impossible to comprehend for most people, because most people cant think further than "A causes B".


What is worse, most people cant even properly understand causes and causation.


this is why they dont make being a bad parent a bigger crime, because their brains arent capable of understanding that most of problems for future generations come from bad parents.


But without understanding wide distance chains, they cannot make the connection of "bad parents = biggest cause of problems in society".


Because wide distance causation chain happens over decades, it does not happen in time short enough for stupid person to comprehend or remember.


So one of biggest causes for all evil in society is somehow treated as a less serious crime, and in many cases not even a crime at all.

SatanLucy
What tournament are you referring to specifically?


Elo in chess, and not a tournament with women only, obviously.



Yes, women frequently play against men in chess

. Most chess tournaments are "open," meaning players of any gender compete together. While there are separate women-only tournaments designed to encourage female participation, women can and do compete in the open section, including top-level tournaments. 


  1. Open vs. Women's Tournaments: Open tournaments allow everyone, while women's tournaments are restricted to female players only.
  2. Performance: Research suggests that women's performance against men is generally in line with their ratings, and top female players are routinely competitive with male counterparts.
  3. Notable Examples: Judit Polgár, widely considered the strongest female player in history, played almost exclusively in open tournaments and reached the top 10 in the world. 




Judit Polgár, widely considered the strongest female chess player in history, achieved a peak Elo rating of 2735 in 2005, ranking 8th in the world. She is the only woman to surpass the 2700 rating barrier and reach the top 10 in the world. She has been inactive in official classical competition since 2015, holding a final rating of 2675.



Hou Yifan: The next highest-rated female player with a peak of 2686 (March 2015), making her the second highest-rated woman in history.

Other Elite Performers: Other top-rated women include Maia Chiburdanidze (peak 2560), Susan Polgar (peak 2577), and current top players like Aleksandra Goryachkina, who have also crossed the 2600 level.




The highest FIDE Elo ratings in chess history are topped by Magnus Carlsen (2882) and Garry Kasparov (2851). While modern rankings fluctuate, these all-time peak records represent the highest performance levels in elite chess. 


Top 10 Highest Peak Classical Elo Ratings 


  1. Magnus Carlsen – 2882 (May 2014)
  2. Garry Kasparov – 2851 (July 1999)
  3. Fabiano Caruana – 2844 (October 2014)
  4. Levon Aronian – 2830 (March 2014)
  5. Wesley So – 2822 (February 2017)
  6. Shakhriyar Mamedyarov – 2820 (September 2018)
  7. Maxime Vachier-Lagrave – 2819 (August 2016)
  8. Viswanathan Anand – 2817 (March 2011)
  9. Vladimir Kramnik – 2817 (October 2016)
  10. Hikaru Nakamura / Veselin Topalov / Ding Liren – 2816 




As of March 2026, Magnus Carlsen remains the world's top-rated classical chess player (approx. 2840 Elo), followed by Hikaru Nakamura and Fabiano Caruana. The top 10 is dominated by elite talents like Arjun Erigaisi, Alireza Firouzja, and young stars, with top ratings clustered above 2750+. 


Here are the top 10 classical chess players with the highest Elo ratings, based on recent 2026 data: 


  1. Magnus Carlsen (Norway) - ~2840
  2. Hikaru Nakamura (USA) - ~2810
  3. Fabiano Caruana (USA) - ~2795
  4. Vincent Keymer (Germany) - ~2776
  5. Arjun Erigaisi (India) - ~2775+
  6. Alireza Firouzja (France) - ~2775+
  7. Ian Nepomniachtchi (Russia) - ~2770+
  8. Ding Liren (China) - ~2760+
  9. Wesley So (USA) - ~2750+
  10. Anish Giri (Netherlands) - ~2750+ 



SatanLucy

Its because owner of debate art went missing, and site crashed multiple times, and was impossible to update. this site was made at a time when debate art crashed and didnt work for like whole week. Now it works again, but cant tell when it will crash, and still cant do updates.

SatanLucy
To say that one loves, is both an over-simplification and often an over-complication


Love actually doesnt exist, its all just chemicals in the brain producing feelings, which was created by evolution to optimize reproduction.


Women dont love anyone, even when they choose him, because they only choose him because better option isnt available.

SatanLucy
Isn't that precious LOL.


Yes, when I said you have a female brain, you said "You are condescending", as if someone on this site has a special duty to care for your feelings. this is why I say you have a female brain, because you mock everyone and expect that your feelings will be safe. In fact, your first post in this topic is you mocking me. Because you dont have logic, you have feelings. You are a woman trapped in man's body.

SatanLucy

And as I said before, I don't care for your "precious feelings" or what offends them. Realistically, when you start mocking me, and then later ask of me to consider your precious feelings, I have to say I am interested in pure logic, and if pure logic happens to offend a precious feeling, well, who cares.

SatanLucy
That wasn't joking


Yeah, it was more like some secret desire on your part. Just as you hoped Trump goes to prison and gets raped. It is some seriously ill mindset which glorifies rape.


LOL, you really don't have a clue, I guess your "all knowing" AI doesn't know what sarcasm is.


Every joke contains a bit of hidden opinion.

SatanLucy

Legal rights dont exist in the world, nor moral rights.


And biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world is USA, who even brought current Iran's regime in power.


Iran will just keep protecting its interests, and USA will keep protecting its interests.


Also, Iran never said it even wants nuclear weapons. In fact, up until Israel's attack, Iran allowed regular international inspection to ensure no nuclear weapons were being built. It is only after Israel's attack on Iran that mentioned inspection stopped coming.


Ayatollah which was killed even stated multiple times that nuclear weapons are not islamic.


But now, after it became clear US will attack any country and try to fund terror groups in any country to start civil war, nuclear weapons are guarantee of peace. Libya agreed to give up on nuclear weapons, and Gaddafi ended up worse than Sadam Hussein.


As North Korea demonstrated, the only guarantee US wont attack you is your own nuclear weapon. And Iran has showed great restraint, realistically, Iran could have done a lot more damage than they did so far. But Iran doesnt usually respond with eye for eye. But when it responds, the world's economy shakes.



SatanLucy

the main difference between feminized brain and man's brain is in goal oriented logic.


For example, a man has a goal and then logically sticks to it and thinks in way to achieve a goal.


A woman, due to emotions, doesnt stick to her own goals or any of their order of importance.


For example, a woman might say her child is most important to her in whole world, and then in burst of emotions hit that same child and hurt it and abuse it, or neglect it.


We know today that AI in past was built entirely on man's way of thinking.


In fact, scientists built AI based on:

goal plus current knowledge plus inference rules (logical operators)


as main system for producing new knowledge.


today's AI is more complex, but it follows same method of goal (prompt) and inference rules for producing new knowledge.


What emotions do is just mess up whole reasoning system, make brain forget its goals or their order of importance, and act on impulse which upon later examination seems entirely dumb.


Emotions are truly something women have a lot more, but its getting more present in men too. A lot of new generations seem to be more feminized than previous generations.

SatanLucy
I don't think I even have a feminine side



there are only two things which guide reasoning:


One is logic. this is what men have a lot.


Other is emotions. this is what women have.



But due to chemicals in food which increase estrogen levels, some portion of men have developed "female like brains".


Instead of being goal-logic oriented, they become emotions oriented.

SatanLucy

IQ doesnt really mean anything. A lot of people with high IQ who never did anything useful. In fact, more educated women or with higher IQ make worse decisions for society. IQ simply doesnt measure goal-driven intelligence, and many sports based on decision making show that women are inferior in decision making to men.

SatanLucy

What you consider "rational" are just your "feel good" emotions which are not rational but merely repeating what is popular to repeat.


Women have much smaller brains than men, and in many species, males are the leaders due to better strength and intelligence.

SatanLucy
Because women are smaller, they agree to give up on being leaders


Any country where women are leaders is just doomed to fail. I have never actually met a woman capable of any logical reasoning. they are purely emotionally driven by comparison to others.